Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-10
review-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-10-secdir-telechat-wallace-2018-01-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Telechat Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-01-23
Requested 2017-12-27
Authors Ladislav Lhotka, Acee Lindem, Yingzhen Qu
Draft last updated 2018-01-25
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -05 by Martin Björklund (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -08 by He Jia (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Carl Wallace
State Completed
Review review-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-10-secdir-telechat-wallace-2018-01-25
Reviewed rev. 10 (document currently at 11)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2018-01-25

Review
review-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-10-secdir-telechat-wallace-2018-01-25

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

I found no issues with the draft. The security considerations section
references NETCONF and RESTCONF for network security, with SSH and TLS
used. This seems fine but I wonder if some guidance on using these a la
RFC6125 would be helpful for some. One question in the security
consideration section. Twice "/routing/ribs/rib" is referred to a list.
Should this be "/routing/ribs"?