Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Telechat Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2018-01-23
Requested 2018-01-05
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Ladislav Lhotka, Acee Lindem, Yingzhen Qu
Draft last updated 2018-01-16
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -05 by Martin Björklund (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -08 by He Jia (diff)
Assignment Reviewer He Jia
State Completed
Review review-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08-rtgdir-telechat-jia-2018-01-16
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 11)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2018-01-16



I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt 
Reviewer: Jia He 
Review Date: 17 January 2018
IETF LC End Date: 15 January 2018 
Telechat date: 25 January 2018
Intended Status: Standards Track

This document provides an NMDA-compliant version of YANG data model for routing management. It is very well written and ready for publication. But I happened to see a small nit in Appendix D just before I finished my review, see below.


Major Issues:
No major issues found.

Minor Issues:
No minor issues found.

In Appendix D, the namespace of "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" is written as "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing-3". "-3" is not meaningful and needs to be deleted.