Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ring-protection-05

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ring-protection
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-04-18
Requested 2013-04-04
Authors Yaacov Weingarten, Stewart Bryant, Daniele Ceccarelli, Diego Caviglia, Francesco Fondelli, Marco Corsi, Wu Bo, Xuehui Dai
Draft last updated 2013-04-09
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Vijay Gurbani (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Tina Tsou (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay Gurbani
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-tp-ring-protection-05-genart-lc-gurbani-2013-04-09
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 06)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2013-04-09


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ring-protection-05
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Apr-09-2013
IETF LC End Date: Apr-18-2013
IESG Telechat date: Not known

This document is ready as an Informational.  Some comments for
changes follow.

Major: 0
Minor: 0
Nits: 3


- S1.1, bullet numbered 3: s/actionis/action is/
- S2, header "P2P Ring Protection": In the header, "P2P" probably
 refers to "Point-to-Point" and not "Peer-to-Peer".  It is okay
 to leave it as such if you think that the readers in the MPLS
 domain will interpret it as "Point-to-Point", but if you think
 it will help to folks (like me) who do not normally work at the
 network layer then it may be worth expanding the acronym out
 in the header.  (FWIW, I initially assumed "P2P" stood for
- S2.1, s/mis-connectivity, should/mis-connectivity should/


- vijay
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg at {,} / vijay.gurbani at