Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
review-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04-genart-lc-housley-2015-09-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-10-02
Requested 2015-09-23
Authors Ron Bonica, Ina Minei, Michael Conn, Dante Pacella, Luis Tomotaki
Draft last updated 2015-09-25
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Leif Johansson (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Bert Wijnen (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -04 by John Drake (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ Housley 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04-genart-lc-housley-2015-09-25
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 06)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2015-09-25

Review
review-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04-genart-lc-housley-2015-09-25

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2014-09-25
IETF LC End Date: 2014-10-02
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary:  Ready.

Major Concerns:  None.

Minor Concerns:  None.

Other Comments:

At the end of Section 1, the document says: "Each protocol listens on
its own UDP port and executes its own unique procedures."  What does
"unique" mean here?  What changes if "unique" is dropped from this
sentence?

Would it be more obvious to the reader the purpose of Section 6 if it
were turned into an appendix?