Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-05
review-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-05-rtgdir-lc-venaas-2018-11-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2018-11-20
Requested 2018-11-05
Requested by Deborah Brungard
Draft last updated 2018-11-20
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Stig Venaas (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Alan DeKok (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Russ Housley (diff)
Comments
Prep for Last Call
Assignment Reviewer Stig Venaas
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-05-rtgdir-lc-venaas-2018-11-20
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 09)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2018-11-20

Review
review-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-05-rtgdir-lc-venaas-2018-11-20

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this
draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or
routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG
review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is
to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about
the Routing Directorate, please see
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs,
it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other
IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them
through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-05.txt
Reviewer: Stig Venaas
Review Date: November 20, 2018
IETF LC End Date:
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary:
No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:
The document is very well written. It is quite easy to read and of
good quality. I could not find any issues, except the nit mentioned
below.

Major Issues:
No major issues found.

Minor Issues:
No minor issues found.

Nits:
I found one typo at the end of 9.4. The word "failurei".

Regards,
Stig