Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-
review-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-secdir-lc-wallace-2011-07-09-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2011-05-30 | |
| Requested | 2011-05-19 | |
| Authors | Zafar Ali, Seisho Yasukawa, George Swallow, Adrian Farrel, Thomas Nadeau, Shaleen Saxena | |
| Draft last updated | 2011-07-09 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Carl Wallace
Tsvdir Last Call review of -?? by Michael Scharf |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Carl Wallace |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-secdir-lc-wallace-2011-07-09 | |
| Review completed: | 2011-07-09 |
Review
review-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-secdir-lc-wallace-2011-07-09
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document defines some extensions to P2P LSP Ping to support P2MP. The security considerations reference those in RFC 4379 with one addition. This seems OK to me.