Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-04
review-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-04-genart-lc-even-2013-12-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-12-10
Requested 2013-11-27
Draft last updated 2013-12-08
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Roni Even (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Review review-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-04-genart-lc-even-2013-12-08
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 06)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2013-12-08

Review
review-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-04-genart-lc-even-2013-12-08

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: 

draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-hsmp-04

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2013–12-8

IETF LC End Date: 2013-12–10

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an standard track RFC

.

 

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues:

 

1.

  

In section 3.1 last paragraph  

“

If the peer has not advertised the corresponding capability, then label messages using the HSMP FEC Element SHOULD NOT be sent to the  peer

. “. Why use a SHOULD NOT and not MUSR NOT

 

 

 

 

Nits/editorial comments:

In section 2 for PTP IEEE1588 need a reference. There is a reference in the reference section but it is not used. Also the tictoc reference is not used.