Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-
I have reviewed this document as part of the security
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just
like any other last call comments.
Some of my comments are following.
The title of this document focuses on flow
binding in Mobile IPv6 and NEMO, However it is not clear how flow binding is
supported in the NEMO? Is the mobile router operation in NEMO same as mobile
node operation in Mobile IPv6?
Is flow summary mobility option is one
sub-option of Flow Identification Mobility Option or one independent new
Should the HA, CN and MAP all support this
specification? If HA does not support, how to direct inbound flows to
specific addresses since one or more flows may bind to a care-of