Telechat Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12
review-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12-intdir-telechat-cao-2017-05-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2017-05-11
Requested 2017-04-20
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Jiazi Yi, Benoit Parrein
Draft last updated 2017-05-09
Completed reviews Intdir Telechat review of -12 by Zhen Cao (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -12 by Loa Andersson (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Peter Yee (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Zhen Cao
State Completed
Review review-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12-intdir-telechat-cao-2017-05-09
Reviewed rev. 12 (document currently at 15)
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2017-05-09

Review
review-ietf-manet-olsrv2-multipath-12-intdir-telechat-cao-2017-05-09

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for this draft. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherds should treat these comments
just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors
and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have
been received. For more details of the INT directorate, see
<http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html>.

I believe this document is ready to publish almost as it is. 

One issue I found during my review lies in Sec. 8.4 where IPv4 loose source routing being discussed.  To avoid unnecessary fragmentation, I am suggesting the following wording change: 

S/  If the length of the path (n) is greater than MAX_SRC_HOPS
      (Section 5), only the "key" routers in the path are kept...
/  If the length of the path (n) is greater than MAX_SRC_HOPS 
      (Section 5), or the adding of source routing header exceeds the path MTU, 
only the "key" routers in the path are kept...

Cheers,
Zhen