Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-06
review-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-06-rtgdir-lc-white-2019-04-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-04-05 | |
| Requested | 2019-03-15 | |
| Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
| Authors | Bow-Nan Cheng, Lou Berger | |
| Draft last updated | 2019-04-01 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -06 by Russ White
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Derrell Piper (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -06 by Bob Briscoe (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Tim Chown |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Russ White |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-06-rtgdir-lc-white-2019-04-01 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 06 (document currently at 07) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2019-04-01 |
Review
review-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-06-rtgdir-lc-white-2019-04-01
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-multi-hop-extension-06.txt Reviewer: Russ White Review Date: 30 March 2019 IETF LC End Date: 5 April 2019 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Quality and Readibility: This draft is well written, easy to read, and easy to understand. Major Issues: None found. Minor Issues: None found. == 😊 /r