Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25
review-ietf-manet-dlep-25-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2016-12-12-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-manet-dlep |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 29) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-11-28 | |
| Requested | 2016-11-08 | |
| Authors | Stan Ratliff, Shawn Jury, Darryl Satterwhite, Rick Taylor, Bo Berry | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-12-12 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -25 by Matthew Miller
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -25 by Paul Hoffman (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -25 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -13 by Lou Berger (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -25 by Michael Scharf (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-manet-dlep-25-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2016-12-12 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 25 (document currently at 29) | |
| Review result | Has Issues | |
| Review completed: | 2016-12-12 |
Review
review-ietf-manet-dlep-25-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2016-12-12
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. My puzzle of this document is how and where the DLEP can be deployed. Your Figure 1 assumes that IEEE802.11 is among the Modem Devices. That means the Modem Devices are IEEE802.11 compliant (say IEEE802.11s compliant). I think IEEE802.11 already has solution between Router and Access Points. Why need another routing protocol? Besides, how many “Modems” are attached to one router? Linda Dunbar Huawei USA IP Technology Lab 5340 Legacy Drive, Plano, TX 75024 Tel: +1 469-277 - 5840 Fax: +1 469 -277 - 5900