Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25
review-ietf-manet-dlep-25-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2016-12-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 29)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2016-11-28
Requested 2016-11-08
Authors Stan Ratliff, Shawn Jury, Darryl Satterwhite, Rick Taylor, Bo Berry
Draft last updated 2016-12-12
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -25 by Matthew Miller (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -25 by Paul Hoffman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -25 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -13 by Lou Berger (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -25 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Review review-ietf-manet-dlep-25-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2016-12-12
Reviewed rev. 25 (document currently at 29)
Review result Has Issues
Review completed: 2016-12-12

Review
review-ietf-manet-dlep-25-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2016-12-12

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors.

Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

 

My puzzle of this document is how and where the DLEP can be deployed.

 

Your Figure 1 assumes that IEEE802.11 is among the Modem Devices. That means the Modem Devices are IEEE802.11 compliant (say IEEE802.11s compliant).

 

I think IEEE802.11 already has solution between Router and Access Points. Why need another routing protocol? Besides, how many “Modems” are attached to one router?

 

 

Linda Dunbar

 

 

Huawei USA IP Technology Lab

5340 Legacy Drive,

Plano, TX 75024

Tel: +1 469-277 - 5840

Fax: +1 469 -277 - 5900