Early Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-01
review-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-01-opsdir-early-baker-2018-08-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-01
Requested rev. 01 (document currently at 05)
Type Early Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-08-24
Requested 2018-08-01
Requested by Gunter Van de Velde
Draft last updated 2018-08-06
Completed reviews Opsdir Early review of -01 by Fred Baker (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Dan Frost (diff)
Comments
The LSVR standardisation work can be enhanced with help of an early review from both the Routing Directorate and Operational Directorate.
Assignment Reviewer Fred Baker
State Completed
Review review-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-01-opsdir-early-baker-2018-08-06
Reviewed rev. 01 (document currently at 05)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2018-08-06

Review
review-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-01-opsdir-early-baker-2018-08-06

> On Aug 1, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Gunter Van de Velde <gunter at vandevelde.cc> wrote:
> 
> 
> Early review of: draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf (rev. 01)
> Deadline: 2018-08-24
> Requested by: Gunter Van de Velde
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf/reviewrequest/10797/
> 
> Gunter Van de Velde has assigned you as a reviewer for this document.


Reviewer: Fred Baker
Review Result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the
IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews
during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
just like any other last call comments.

I read the draft in some detail. My big catch was, in section 5.4:

   Given the fact that SPF algorithms are based on the assumption that
   all routers in the routing domain calculate the precisely the same
   SPF tree and install the same set of routers

The assumption is that all such routers install the same set of *routes*, not *routers*.

And frankly, if that was my biggest issue, the draft is in pretty good shape.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that there is a highway to hell and a stairway to heaven is an interesting comment on projected traffic volume...