Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19-tsvart-telechat-trammell-2018-09-25-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 30) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Transport Area Review Team (tsvart) | |
| Deadline | 2018-09-25 | |
| Requested | 2018-09-11 | |
| Authors | Dino Farinacci, Vince Fuller, David Meyer, Darrel Lewis, Albert Cabellos-Aparicio | |
| Draft last updated | 2018-09-25 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -14 by John Drake
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Kyle Rose (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Scott Bradner (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -15 by Brian Trammell (diff) Genart Telechat review of -16 by Francis Dupont (diff) Tsvart Telechat review of -19 by Brian Trammell (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -18 by Kyle Rose (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Brian Trammell |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19-tsvart-telechat-trammell-2018-09-25 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 19 (document currently at 30) | |
| Review result | Ready with Nits | |
| Review completed: | 2018-09-25 |
Review
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19-tsvart-telechat-trammell-2018-09-25
Thanks for the revisions. Following up on my previous tsvart review, there is one remaining nit from
previous transport reviews:
- Section 5.3, the list "When doing ITR/PITR encapsulation", third item needs a citation fix:
OLD:
The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7
of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in
order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC3168].
NEW:
The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7
of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in
order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC6040].
Thanks, cheers,
Brian