Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19-tsvart-telechat-trammell-2018-09-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 27)
Type Telechat Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2018-09-25
Requested 2018-09-11
Draft last updated 2018-09-25
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -14 by John Drake (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Scott Bradner (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -15 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -16 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -19 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -18 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian Trammell
State Completed
Review review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19-tsvart-telechat-trammell-2018-09-25
Reviewed rev. 19 (document currently at 27)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2018-09-25

Review
review-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19-tsvart-telechat-trammell-2018-09-25

Thanks for the revisions. Following up on my previous tsvart review, there is one remaining nit from 
previous transport reviews:

- Section 5.3, the list "When doing ITR/PITR encapsulation", third item needs a citation fix: 

OLD:

      The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7
      of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in
      order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC3168].

NEW:

     The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7
      of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in
      order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC6040].

Thanks, cheers,

Brian