Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06
review-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06-genart-lc-yee-2016-02-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-02-05 | |
| Requested | 2016-01-25 | |
| Authors | Luigi Iannone, Roger Jorgensen, David Conrad, Geoff Huston | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-02-06 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Peter Yee
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Peter Yee (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Dacheng Zhang (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Susan Hares (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Peter Yee |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06-genart-lc-yee-2016-02-06 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 06 (document currently at 07) | |
| Review result | Not Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2016-02-06 |
Review
review-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06-genart-lc-yee-2016-02-06
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comment. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06 Reviewer: Peter Yee Review Date: February 5, 2016 IETF LC End Date: February 5, 2016 IESG Telechat date: February 18, 2016 Summary: This draft has serious issues, described in the review, and needs to be rethought. [Not ready] The draft attempts to specify the framework for the management of experimental LISP EID sub-prefixes, but really could use some additional work to flesh out the management aspects that are left unsaid. This draft fixes only two minor nits I raised in my review of the -04 version. Nothing else has been addressed, nor have I received any feedback on that review. In light of this, I have little new to add. It is possible that the agreement between the IANA and the RIPE NCC will alleviate the major concern I had with the draft, but not being privy to that agreement, I can't make that determination. My original review with the unaddressed comments can be found here: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg11620.html