Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04
review-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04-genart-lc-carpenter-2015-12-16-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-12-24
Requested 2015-12-14
Authors Al Morton
Draft last updated 2015-12-16
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Brian Carpenter (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Brian Carpenter (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian Carpenter
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04-genart-lc-carpenter-2015-12-16
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 06)
Review result Almost Ready
Review completed: 2015-12-16

Review
review-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04-genart-lc-carpenter-2015-12-16

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-12-16
IETF LC End Date: 2015-12-24
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: Almost ready
--------

Minor Issue:
------------

   We note that [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] proposes
   a method similar to [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m], and ippm-list discussion
   indicates [I-D.chen-ippm-coloring-based-ipfpm-framework] may be
   covered by the same IPR as [I-D.tempia-opsawg-p3m].

I suggest removing the IPR comment. It may be an issue, but not for this
draft. We generally avoid taking a position on IPR applicablity (in fact,
our lawyer tells us not to do so).