Last Call Review of draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02
review-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02-genart-lc-bryant-2019-07-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-08-14
Requested 2019-07-17
Authors Pete Resnick, Adrian Farrel
Draft last updated 2019-07-30
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Melinda Shore (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Review review-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02-genart-lc-bryant-2019-07-30
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/wN04NHfo-CCf7cxLGQMtleHLkjo
Reviewed rev. 02 (document currently at 03)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2019-07-30

Review
review-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02-genart-lc-bryant-2019-07-30

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7776bis-02
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2019-07-30
IETF LC End Date: 2019-08-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This is a well written document making an administrative update to RFC 7776 and it is ready for publication in this format.

However, given that RFC 7776 may be read by someone who is distressed having been harassed, and who may not know about errata, I wonder if it would be better to issue a clean copy of the main RFC with these (and no other) changes.  If needed the RFC Editor could simply apply these edits to their master copy.


Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
  == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of
     draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis-06