Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25
review-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25-genart-lc-shirazipour-2013-12-03-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 26) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2013-12-17 | |
| Requested | 2013-10-21 | |
| Authors | Roy Fielding, Julian Reschke | |
| Draft last updated | 2013-12-03 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -25 by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -24 by Menachem Dodge (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -24 by Klaas Wierenga (diff) Secdir Early review of -?? by Klaas Wierenga |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25-genart-lc-shirazipour-2013-12-03 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 25 (document currently at 26) | |
| Review result | Ready with Nits | |
| Review completed: | 2013-12-03 |
Review
review-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25-genart-lc-shirazipour-2013-12-03
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve any Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2013-11-18/2013-12-02 IETF LC End Date: End of November (special deadline) IESG Telechat date: 2013-12-19 Summary: This draft is almost ready to be published as Proposed Standard but I have some comments. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: Part 4 of: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging (82 pages) draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics (98 pages) *draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional (27 pages) draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range (24 pages) draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache (41 pages) draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth (18 pages) draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations (7 pages) draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations (5 pages) -[Page 4], Introduction, it would make the draft clearer if we give 1-2 every day examples of when conditions are used/useful. -[Page 10], "filesystem"---->"file system" -General comment: since mostly used with caching, why not considered merging with part 6? - [Page 22], Security section, as mentioned in my other reviews, would it be better to have a separate draft to discuss all security issues related to HTTP? Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com