Telechat Review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08
review-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08-genart-telechat-romascanu-2016-07-15-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-07-05
Requested 2016-06-22
Authors Tobias Heer, Samu Varjonen
Draft last updated 2016-07-15
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Sean Turner (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -08 by Sean Turner (diff)
Intdir Early review of -05 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Intdir Early review of -05 by Pascal Thubert (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Qin Wu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Romascanu
State Completed
Review review-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08-genart-telechat-romascanu-2016-07-15
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 09)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2016-07-15

Review
review-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08-genart-telechat-romascanu-2016-07-15






I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting
 a new version of the draft.




 




For more information, please see the FAQ at




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        





<https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.




 




Document: draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02




Reviewer: Dan Romascanu




Review Date: 07/07/16




IETF LC End Date: 07/21/16




IESG Telechat date: 




 




Summary: Ready. 




 




This informational document which obsoletes RFC 3778 provides an overview of the PDF format and updates the media type registration of “application/pdf” by aligning it with RFC 6838. I am no expert in application formats, but the document
 seems to be well informed and clearly written. A couple of nits generate id-nits warnings (updating RFC 3778 is not mentioned in the Abstract, one unused reference) that can be easily fixed during the RFC Editor processing.





 




Major issues:




 




Minor issues:




 




Nits/editorial comments: