Early Review of draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-08

Request Review of draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2016-05-27
Requested 2016-05-17
Draft last updated 2016-05-27
Completed reviews Genart Telechat review of -08 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Yaron Sheffer (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Yaron Sheffer
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Sarah Banks (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -08 by Russ White (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ White
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-08-rtgdir-early-white-2016-05-27
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 09)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2016-05-27



I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​


Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-08
Reviewer: Russ White 
Review Date: 27 May 2016
IETF LC End Date: 23 May 2016
Intended Status: Informational

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

This is a very useful draft for informational state. Overall, the draft is well written, the diagrams are helpful, and the references look correct.

Major Issues:
None found

Minor Issues:
None found


It is important to understand the background of how DHCP works when considering those diagrams.

The relay agent that receives client’s message sets giaddr field to the address...
Either remove "field" after giaddr or add "the" before giaddr

I found one or two more really minor nits, but didn't write them down, and now can't find them again. Generally, though, the quality of this document is very high, and all nits are very minor.