Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-
review-ietf-dccp-udpencap-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-06-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2012-06-01
Requested 2012-05-18
Authors Thomas Phelan, Gorry Fairhurst, Colin Perkins
Draft last updated 2012-06-19
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Tina Tsou
Assignment Reviewer Tina Tsou
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dccp-udpencap-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-06-19
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2012-06-19

Review
review-ietf-dccp-udpencap-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-06-19

Hi,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

I find one case which can be a small disadvantage: both sides have to be updated to use tunneling, even if only one side is blocked by NAT. Can we handle this case?


Tina
Sent from my IPv6 address 2001:0:4137:9e76:20f1:518:f56e:f6a5
RFC Editor IASA & IETF LLC IETF Trust IRTF IETF IESG IAB IANA Privacy Statement IETF Tools