Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03

Request Review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-01-23
Requested 2014-01-09
Authors Ólafur Guðmundsson
Draft last updated 2014-01-15
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -03 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Tobias Gondrom (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Romascanu 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03-genart-lc-romascanu-2014-01-15
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 04)
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2014-01-15


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at




Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.



Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 1/15/2014

IETF LC End Date: 1/23/2014

IESG Telechat date:



Ready with issues


Major issues:

None – it’s a simple, clear and useful document. 


Minor issues:



In Section 2.3 the I-D recommends that the values in reference column for SHA-256 and SHA-512 refer to [RFC 6698] while the IANA Considerations section in RFC 6698 recommends and the registry entries in the TLSA
 Matching Types table at

  point to [RFC 6234].



As this I-D updates the registries with a column for acronyms, it seems more accurate that the reference columns of all tables mention both  [RFC 6698] and [RFC XXXX] (this RFC)


Nits/editorial comments:

In the Introduction section: 

‘This document updates the IANA registry definition for TLSA

   record to add a column with acronym for each specified field’

s/acronym/an acronym/