Telechat Review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09
review-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09-genart-telechat-dunbar-2019-08-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-08-06
Requested 2019-07-31
Authors Ben Harris, Loganaden Velvindron
Draft last updated 2019-08-06
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Catherine Meadows (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Review review-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09-genart-telechat-dunbar-2019-08-06
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/aJyN-jfIGglmOjF0eGU6VGgJ41M
Reviewed rev. 09 (document currently at 11)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2019-08-06

Review
review-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09-genart-telechat-dunbar-2019-08-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-??
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2019-08-06
IETF LC End Date: None
IESG Telechat date: 2019-08-08

Summary:

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

The document  has a few sentences to explain "public key algorithm for use with SSH   in accordance with RFC4253, RFC4251" and give a name. and One sentence  to say "Signatures are generated according to the procedure in RFC8032". 
I personally don't think it is a Standard Track document. Informational would be more appropriate. But there is no harm to be standard track. 
Linda Dunbar