Telechat Review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09
review-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09-genart-telechat-dunbar-2019-08-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2019-08-06 | |
| Requested | 2019-07-31 | |
| Authors | Ben Harris, Loganaden Velvindron | |
| Draft last updated | 2019-08-06 | |
| Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Sheng Jiang
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Catherine Meadows (diff) Genart Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Genart Telechat review of -09 by Linda Dunbar (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09-genart-telechat-dunbar-2019-08-06 | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/aJyN-jfIGglmOjF0eGU6VGgJ41M | |
| Reviewed rev. | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2019-08-06 |
Review
review-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09-genart-telechat-dunbar-2019-08-06
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-?? Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review Date: 2019-08-06 IETF LC End Date: None IESG Telechat date: 2019-08-08 Summary: Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: The document has a few sentences to explain "public key algorithm for use with SSH in accordance with RFC4253, RFC4251" and give a name. and One sentence to say "Signatures are generated according to the procedure in RFC8032". I personally don't think it is a Standard Track document. Informational would be more appropriate. But there is no harm to be standard track. Linda Dunbar