Telechat Review of draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-
review-ietf-codec-guidelines-genart-telechat-thomson-2011-11-30-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-codec-guidelines |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2011-11-17 | |
| Requested | 2011-11-03 | |
| Authors | Jean-Marc Valin, Slava Borilin, Koen Vos, Christopher Montgomery, Juin-Hwey Chen | |
| Draft last updated | 2011-11-30 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Telechat review of -?? by Martin Thomson
Genart Telechat review of -?? by Martin Thomson Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Taylor Yu Secdir Telechat review of -?? by Taylor Yu |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Martin Thomson |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-codec-guidelines-genart-telechat-thomson-2011-11-30 | |
| Review completed: | 2011-11-30 |
Review
review-ietf-codec-guidelines-genart-telechat-thomson-2011-11-30
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-05 Reviewer: Martin Thomson Review Date: 2011-10-11 IETF LC End Date: 2011-10-19 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but has nits that should be considered before publication. Nits: This document describes a process that seems to touch on points in 2026 and other BCPs. It does not clearly identify whether this process is _different_, or whether the intent is to simply explain the application of the BCPs with codec-specific elaboration. It would appear that it's the latter, but I'm far from expert in these matters. A short statement identifying the which choice, and the intent of any differences (if any) would be helpful. Nitty nits: Missing citation for ITU-R BS.1534 (MUSHRA) Missing expansion on first use of several acronyms (e.g., PESQ, PEAQ, and SegSNR)