Last Call Review of draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-18
review-ietf-cdni-metadata-18-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-06-28-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-cdni-metadata |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 21) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-06-27 | |
| Requested | 2016-06-16 | |
| Authors | Ben Niven-Jenkins, Rob Murray, Matt Caulfield, Kevin Ma | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-06-28 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -18 by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -19 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -18 by Dacheng Zhang (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Sheng Jiang (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-cdni-metadata-18-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-06-28 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 18 (document currently at 21) | |
| Review result | Ready with Nits | |
| Review completed: | 2016-06-28 |
Review
review-ietf-cdni-metadata-18-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-06-28
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Document: draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-18 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2016-06-27 IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-27 IESG Telechat date: 2016-07-07 Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: -[Page 19]: " Property: pattern Description: A pattern for string matching. The pattern can contain the wildcards * and ?, where * matches any sequence of characters (including the empty string) and ? matches exactly one character. The three literals $, * and ? should be escaped as $$, $* and $?. All other characters are treated as literals. " Question: The $ character is not described. What does $$ mean if $? is the one character match? -[Page 20], section 4.1.6, "to evaulate"--typo-->"to evaluate" "is specifed"--typo-->"is specified" -[Page 24], section 4.2.1.1 "objecct,"--typo-->"object," -[Page 50-54], sections 7.1.1 to 7.1.20 "capabilitiy"--typo?-->"capability" (many times) -General, does the "MI" prefix stand for "Metadata Interface"? Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com