Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-11
review-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-11-secdir-lc-nystrom-2014-01-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2014-01-05
Requested 2013-12-12
Authors Attila Takacs, Don Fedyk, He Jia
Draft last updated 2014-01-09
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by David Black (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by David Black (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Magnus Nystrom (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Warren Kumari (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Magnus Nystrom
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-11-secdir-lc-nystrom-2014-01-09
Reviewed rev. 11 (document currently at 13)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2014-01-09

Review
review-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-11-secdir-lc-nystrom-2014-01-09

 I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
 These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security 
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 
comments just like any other last call comments.

This document describes extensions to RSVP-TE in support of the establishment of Operation, Administration and Management entities in the context of GMPLS .


The document seems well written. I would suggest removing the last sentence of the Security Considerations section ("Cryptography can be used...") since it does not really offer any hint as to how to use cryptography. Instead, the previous sentence could be replaced with something like: "For a more comprehensive discussion of GMPLS security, and attack mitigation techniques, please see the
   Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS Networks [

RFC5920

]."

 

-- Magnus