Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-
review-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-secdir-lc-emery-2011-06-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2011-06-06
Requested 2011-05-27
Draft last updated 2011-06-30
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Shawn Emery
Tsvdir Last Call review of -?? by James Polk
Assignment Reviewer Shawn Emery
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-secdir-lc-emery-2011-06-30
Review completed: 2011-06-30

Review
review-ietf-ccamp-asymm-bw-bidir-lsps-bis-secdir-lc-emery-2011-06-30

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.



This standards track draft re-purposes an experimental RFC, 5467, to 


standards track.  5467 (and this draft) describes a protocol to support 


bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) with asymmetric bandwidth.






The security considerations section does exist and asserts that there 


are no additional attacks by adding upstream signaling, which I agree with.




General comments:

Thank you for referencing the underlying security framework for this draft.

Editorial comments:

None.

Shawn.
--