Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-06
|Requested rev.||05 (document currently at 09)|
|Type||Last Call Review|
|Team||YANG Doctors (yangdoctors)|
|Requested by||Daniele Ceccarelli|
|Authors||Stefan Vallin, Martin Björklund|
|Draft last updated||2018-12-19|
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -06 by Carl Moberg
Rtgdir Last Call review of -06 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Shawn Emery (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Dan Romascanu
WG last call passed.
|Reviewed rev.||06 (document currently at 09)|
I have reviewed this document as part of the YANG doctors directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document includes two YANG modules: - email@example.com - firstname.lastname@example.org ..and an example YANG module: - example-xyz-alarms.yang The modules are valid, well-written, concise and provide ample documentation. I have pointed out two small spelling errors in descriptive text, but will leave it to the editors to decide on the potential need for submitting a new version.