Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-ir-03
review-ietf-bess-ir-03-secdir-lc-nystrom-2016-08-04-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-bess-ir |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-08-10 | |
| Requested | 2016-07-28 | |
| Authors | Eric Rosen, Karthik Subramanian, Zhaohui Zhang | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-08-04 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Paul Kyzivat
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Magnus Nystrom (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Qin Wu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Magnus Nystrom |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-bess-ir-03-secdir-lc-nystrom-2016-08-04 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2016-08-04 |
Review
review-ietf-bess-ir-03-secdir-lc-nystrom-2016-08-04
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document describes the establishment and use of so-called "ingress replication tunnels" in connection with multicast VPNs. As such, the document, as I read it, merely provides further details on the procedures already defined in RFC 6513 and RFC 6514. Correspondingly, I would agree with the assertion in the Security Considerations section that the Security Considerations sections in those RFCs still apply. -- Magnus