Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05
review-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-12-18
Requested 2018-12-04
Draft last updated 2018-12-18
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -04 by Yingzhen Qu (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Stephen Kent (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Review review-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-18
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 07)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2018-12-18

Review
review-ietf-bess-evpn-vpls-seamless-integ-05-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2018-12-18

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready with comments

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These 
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the 
IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews 
during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments 
just like any other last call comments. 

The draft describes the procedures for EVPN PEs to handle traffic from VPLS PEs, to enable smooth transition from VPLS network to EVPN network. 
The procedures are written very clear, (although I am not sure why it is a Standard Track document as the document is mainly in describing the procedures of PEs that support both EVPN & VPLS). 

Question to the authors: 

Page 8 Section 3.2: why set up the PW if keep it operationally down? 


Best Regards, 
Linda Dunbar