Last Call Review of draft-ietf-avtext-avpf-ccm-layered-03
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Nov-30-2016
IETF LC End Date: Dec-14-2016
IESG Telechat date: Unknown
This document is ready as an Proposed Standard (modulo a couple of
minor and nit comments below).
- S5, S6: This is a standards-track document. As such, I am not sure
what the "(Informative)" moniker implies in the section heading.
Since there is no RFC-2119 type of exhortations in the sections, it
seems reasonable to simply remove the "(Informative)" tag in the
section headings without loosing any material context while reading
the paragraph. The presence of the tag renders ambiguity.
- S1: s/which the FIR request/that the FIR request/
- S1: In this section and rest of the document, you sometimes use FIR
and at other times Full Intra Request. Once you have defined Full
Intra Request as FIR, I would suggest using FIR for consistency.
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: email@example.com / firstname.lastname@example.org
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq