Last Call Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06
review-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-08-05-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2014-08-08 | |
| Requested | 2014-07-30 | |
| Draft last updated | 2014-08-05 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Joel Halpern
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Bert Wijnen (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Benoît Claise |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Bert Wijnen |
| State | Completed | |
| Review | review-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-08-05 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 06 (document currently at 07) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2014-08-05 |
Review
review-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-08-05
Hi, I did ops-dir review for draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06.txt I basically looked at any Operational and Network Management aspects of the document. I see none that have any special impact from that point of view. I do see in the acknowledgements section: [[ NOTE: If you contributed and we missed your name, please let us know. ]] Is that intended to stay in the RFC? I have not seen this before (at least not in an RFC) An RFC is immutable, so at that point it would not be changed anymore. Bert