Last Call Review of draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
review-ietf-acme-ip-06-secdir-lc-harkins-2019-06-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-acme-ip
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-06-13
Requested 2019-05-29
Requested by Roman Danyliw
Authors Roland Shoemaker
Draft last updated 2019-06-06
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Dan Harkins (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Joel Jaeggli (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Harkins
State Completed
Review review-ietf-acme-ip-06-secdir-lc-harkins-2019-06-06
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/PnrgLQpqQCFEaeUHR49QOa8E8LE
Reviewed rev. 06 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2019-06-06

Review
review-ietf-acme-ip-06-secdir-lc-harkins-2019-06-06

   Greetings,

   I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

   The summary of the review is READY.

   This draft adds two new ACME Validation Methods to allow for validation
of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in X.509 certificates. It is short, simple,
and to the point. The Security Considerations are minimal (basically "see
this other RFC") but given what is being added seem entirely fine.

   regards,

   Dan.