Last Call Review of draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
review-ietf-acme-ip-06-genart-lc-sparks-2019-06-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-acme-ip
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-06-12
Requested 2019-05-29
Authors Roland Shoemaker
Draft last updated 2019-06-03
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Dan Harkins (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Joel Jaeggli (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed
Review review-ietf-acme-ip-06-genart-lc-sparks-2019-06-03
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Hu8CIjCIMvnq6jpP1wI5TQDO65k
Reviewed rev. 06 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2019-06-03

Review
review-ietf-acme-ip-06-genart-lc-sparks-2019-06-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-acme-ip-06
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2019-06-03
IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-12
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready for publication as a proposed standard rfc.

One minor nit: The security considerations section reads oddly. I'm not sure what it means for an extension to deviate from a threat model. I think you want to say "does not add to" rather than "does not deviate"?