Last Call Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05
review-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05-tsvart-lc-tuexen-2017-02-16-00

Request Review of draft-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2017-02-21
Requested 2017-01-24
Authors Ted Hardie
Draft last updated 2017-02-16
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by Michael Tüxen (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Michael Tüxen
State Completed
Review review-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05-tsvart-lc-tuexen-2017-02-16
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2017-02-16

Review
review-hardie-privsec-metadata-insertion-05-tsvart-lc-tuexen-2017-02-16

I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area directorate's ongoing
effort to review key IETF documents.
These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors,
but are copied to the document's authors for their information and to allow
them to address any issues raised. When done at the time of IETF Last Call,
the authors should consider this review together with any other last-call
comments they receive.
Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be
fixed before publication.

Running https://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/idnits.pyht reports
* The abstract seems to contain references ([RFC7624]), which it shouldn't.
* Unused Reference: 'RFC4301'

The discussion of RFC 7871 in section 4 could be improved to allow readers
not knowing the EDNS0 option to get the point. Either provide an abstract
description or refer to RFC 6891.