Last Call Review of draft-gellens-lost-validation-05
review-gellens-lost-validation-05-secdir-lc-emery-2020-03-06-00

Request Review of draft-gellens-lost-validation
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2020-03-31
Requested 2020-02-25
Authors Randall Gellens, Brian Rosen
Draft last updated 2020-03-06
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Shawn Emery (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Shawn Emery
State Completed
Review review-gellens-lost-validation-05-secdir-lc-emery-2020-03-06
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/DyfJfoS9zR-r8gczBSWlPtiJutc
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 09)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2020-03-04

Review
review-gellens-lost-validation-05-secdir-lc-emery-2020-03-06

Reviewer: Shawn M. Emery
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft specifies an IANA registry for the Location-to-Service
Translation
(LoST) Protocol Validation Service Tag under U-NAPTR.

The security considerations section does exist and refers to RFC 3958 and
4848.
I agree that this change does not introduce any new security considerations.

General comments:

None.

Editorial comments:

Abbreviations should be expanded in the title of the draft and when first
used (in this case the Abstract).
s/...//

Shawn.
--