Telechat Review of draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08

Request Review of draft-faltstrom-unicode11
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-03-12
Requested 2019-03-05
Authors Patrik Fältström
Draft last updated 2019-03-18
Completed reviews I18ndir Last Call review of -07 by Harald Alvestrand (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Samuel Weiler
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Dan Romascanu
Assignment Reviewer Dan Romascanu
State Completed
Review review-faltstrom-unicode11-08-genart-telechat-romascanu-2019-03-18
Reviewed rev. 08
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2019-03-18


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 2019-03-18
IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-05
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat


This document is Ready. However, I have signaled one minor issue in my LC review which was not addressed in the revision, neither have I seen an answer to the clarification that I requested (unless I missed some mail). 

Major issues:

Minor issues:

(from my previous review, not addressed) 

The IANA Considerations text is not clear to me.

> IANA is requested to update the IDNA Parameters registry of derived
   property values, after the expert reviewer validates that the derived
   property values are calculated correctly.

What does this exactly say? Are these recommendations for future actions, or do
they refer specifically to property values described in this document? Are the
expert reviewer validation and IDNA Parameters registry update required to be
performed prior to approval of this document?

Nits/editorial comments: