Last Call Review of draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04

Request Review of draft-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-01-05
Requested 2014-12-15
Authors Spencer Dawkins
Draft last updated 2014-12-28
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Shaun Cooley (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Susan Hares (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Susan Hares
State Completed
Review review-dawkins-iesg-one-or-more-04-opsdir-lc-hares-2014-12-28
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 05)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2014-12-28




I have been selected as the ops-dir reviewer for the dawkins-iesg-one-more-04 draft.  I find this draft ready to publish, but please consider editorial question and nits below. Please send me email if you have any questions. 




Status of the draft:

 Ready to publish, but a few questions should be considered below due to its status as genart document.   


Cross-check in Review:

  Double checked all process documents and statements in each of the RFCs or drafts. 


Editorial Question:  

Do you want give a document reference in the IESG minutes (online) where the IESG provided Nomcom a position description for the Second Area Director for the Routing Area in 1999? 


Nits found by RFC tools: 





You created this draft 46 days ago 



IPR tools are complaining about the draft due to the creation dates of RFC2418 and RFC2026 (see below) 


On the IPR issues, I cannot find any reason why the IPR based on the creation dates of RFC2418 and RFC2026 are relevant.  However, this reviewer I am not a lawyer. 


Text from tools regarding IPR 


(Using the creation date from RFC2418, updated by this document, for RFC5378 checks: 1998-09-09)


(Using the creation date from RFC2026, updated by this document, for RFC5378 checks: 1996-04-29)


--The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008.  If you have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to grant the BCP78 rights to the IETF Trust, then this is fine, and you can ignore this comment.  If not, you may need to add the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. 


(See the Legal Provisions document at for more information.)