PIM Working Group                                                 X. Liu
Internet-Draft                                                     Jabil
Intended status: Standards Track                           P. McAllister
Expires: August 30, 2018                             Metaswitch Networks
                                                                A. Peter
                                                              Individual
                                                            M. Sivakumar
                                                           Cisco Systems
                                                                  Y. Liu
                                                     Huawei Technologies
                                                                   F. Hu
                                                         ZTE Corporation
                                                       February 26, 2018


       A YANG data model for Protocol-Independent Multicast (PIM)
                         draft-ietf-pim-yang-14

Abstract

   This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure
   and manage devices supporting Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM).
   The model covers the PIM protocol configuration, operational state,
   and event notifications data.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on August 30, 2018.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.





Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.1.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     1.2.  Tree Diagrams Prefixes  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     1.3.  Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   2.  Design of Data Model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.1.  Scope of model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.2.  Optional Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     2.3.  Datastore Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     2.4.  Module and Hierarchy Organization . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     2.5.  Position of Address Family in Hierarchy . . . . . . . . .   7
   3.  Module Structure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     3.1.  PIM Base Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       3.1.1.  High-level Structure  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       3.1.2.  Global Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       3.1.3.  Per Address Family Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       3.1.4.  PIM Interface Modeling  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
       3.1.5.  Neighbor Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
       3.1.6.  Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     3.2.  PIM RP module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
       3.2.1.  Static RP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
       3.2.2.  BSR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
       3.2.3.  RP State Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  15
       3.2.4.  RP to Group Mappings  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
       3.2.5.  Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  16
     3.3.  PIM-SM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17
     3.4.  PIM-DM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
     3.5.  PIM-BIDIR module  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  18
   4.  Complete Tree Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     4.1.  PIM base module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  20
     4.2.  PIM RP module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24
     4.3.  PIM-SM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  26
     4.4.  PIM-DM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
     4.5.  PIM-BIDIR module  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  28
   5.  Relationship to the PIM-STD-MIB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  29
     5.1.  pimInterfaceTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  29
     5.2.  pimNeighborTable  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  30



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     5.3.  pimStarGTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  30
     5.4.  pimSGTable  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  31
     5.5.  pimSGRptTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  32
     5.6.  pimBidirDFElectionTable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  32
     5.7.  pimStaticRPTable  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  33
     5.8.  pimAnycastRPSetTable  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  33
     5.9.  pimGroupMappingTable  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  33
   6.  PIM YANG Modules  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  34
     6.1.  PIM base module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  34
     6.2.  PIM RP module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  56
     6.3.  PIM-SM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  71
     6.4.  PIM-DM module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  77
     6.5.  PIM-BIDIR module  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  79
   7.  Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  87
   8.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  88
   9.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  89
   10. Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  91
   11. References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  91
     11.1.  Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  91
     11.2.  Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  93
   Appendix A.  Data Tree Example  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  95
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

1.  Introduction

   YANG [RFC7950] is a data definition language that was introduced to
   model the configuration and running state of a device managed using
   network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF
   [RFC8040].  YANG is now also being used as a component of wider
   management interfaces, such as CLIs.

   This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure
   and manage devices supporting Protocol-Independent Multicast (PIM).
   This model supports the core PIM protocol, as well as many other
   features described in Section 2.1.  Non-core features are defined as
   optional in the provided data model.

1.1.  Terminology

   The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in
   [RFC7950].

   The following abbreviations are used in this document and the defined
   model:

   ASM:
      Any-Source Multicast service model [RFC3569] [RFC4607].




Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   BFD:
      Bidirectional Forwarding Detection [RFC5880].

   BSR:
      Bootstrap Router [RFC5059].

   DF:
      Designated Forwarder [RFC5015].

   DR:
      Designated Router [RFC7761].

   IGMP:
      Internet Group Management Protocol [RFC3376].

   MLD:
      Multicast Listener Discovery [RFC3810].

   MSDP:
      Multicast Source Discovery Protocol [RFC3618].

   mLDP:
      Multipoint extensions for LDP [RFC6388].

   MRIB:
      Multicast Routing Information Base [RFC3973] [RFC5015] [RFC7761].

   mVPN:
      Multicast VPN.

   PIM:
      Protocol Independent Multicast.  [RFC3973] [RFC5015] [RFC7761].

   PIM-BIDIR:
      Protocol Independent Multicast - Bidirectional Mode [RFC5015].

   PIM-DM:
      Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode [RFC3973].

   PIM-SM:
      Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode [RFC7761].

   RP:
      Rendezvous Point.  [RFC7761].

   RPA:
      Rendezvous Point Address.  [RFC5015].




Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   RPF:
      Reverse Path Forwarding.  [RFC3973] [RFC5015] [RFC7761].

   RPT:
      Rendezvous-Point Tree.  [RFC7761].

   SPT:
      Shortest Path Tree.  [RFC7761].

   SSM:
      Source-Specific Multicast service model [RFC3569] [RFC4607].

   VRF:
      Virtual Routing and Forwarding.

1.2.  Tree Diagrams Prefixes

   Tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined in
   [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams].

1.3.  Prefixes in Data Node Names

   In this document, names of data nodes, actions, and other data model
   objects are often used without a prefix, as long as it is clear from
   the context in which YANG module each name is defined.  Otherwise,
   names are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
   corresponding YANG module, as shown in Table 1.

     +-----------+--------------------+------------------------------+
     | Prefix    | YANG module        | Reference                    |
     +-----------+--------------------+------------------------------+
     | yang      | ietf-yang-types    | [RFC6991]                    |
     | inet      | ietf-inet-types    | [RFC6991]                    |
     | if        | ietf-interfaces    | [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis] |
     | rt        | ietf-routing       | [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis] |
     | rt-types  | ietf-routing-types | [RFC8294]                    |
     | bfd-types | ietf-bfd-types     | [I-D.ietf-bfd-yang]          |
     +-----------+--------------------+------------------------------+

             Table 1: Prefixes and Corresponding YANG Modules

2.  Design of Data Model

2.1.  Scope of model

   The model covers PIM Sparse Mode [RFC7761], including the Source-
   Specific subset [RFC3569] [RFC4607], Dense Mode [RFC3973], and Bi-
   directional PIM [RFC5015].



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   The PIM extensions represented in the model include BSR [RFC5059] and
   Anycast-RP [RFC4610].

   The data model can be used to configure and manage these protocol
   features.  The operational state data and statistics can be retrieved
   by this model.  The protocol specific notifications are also defined
   in the model.

   This model does not cover other multicast protocols such as IGMP/MLD,
   MSDP, mVPN, or mLDP in-band signalling.  It does not cover any
   configuration required to generate the MRIB.  These will be specified
   in separate documents.

2.2.  Optional Capabilities

   This model is designed to represent the capabilities of devices
   supporting PIM with various specifications, including some with basic
   subsets of the PIM protocol.  The main design goals of this document
   are that any major now-existing implementation may be said to support
   the base model, and that the configuration of all implementations
   meeting the specification is easy to express through some combination
   of the features in the base model and simple vendor augmentations.

   There is also value in widely-supported features being standardized,
   to save work for individual vendors, and so that mapping between
   different vendors' configuration is not needlessly complicated.
   Therefore, these modules declare a number of features representing
   capabilities that not all deployed devices support.

   The extensive use of feature declarations should also substantially
   simplify the capability negotiation process for a vendor's PIM
   implementation.

   On the other hand, operational state parameters are not so widely
   designated as features, as there are many cases where the defaulting
   of an operational state parameter would not cause any harm to the
   system, and it is much more likely that an implementation without
   native support for a piece of operational state would be able to
   derive a suitable value for a state variable that is not natively
   supported.

   For the same reason, wide constant ranges (for example, timer maxima
   and minima) will be used in the model.  It is expected that vendors
   will augment the model with any specific extensions and restrictions
   needed to adapt it to their vendor specific implementation.






Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


2.3.  Datastore Applicability

   This model conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture
   (NMDA) [I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores].  The operational state
   data is combined with the associated configuration data in the same
   hierarchy [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis].

2.4.  Module and Hierarchy Organization

   This model defines several separate modules for modelling PIM
   configuration, defined below.  Again, this separation will make it
   easier to express the specific capabilities of a PIM device.

   The hierarchy of PIM configuration is designed so that objects that
   are only relevant for one situation or feature are collected in a
   container for that feature.  For example, the configuration for PIM-
   SM that is not relevant for an SSM-only implementation is collected
   in an ASM container.

   Where fields are not genuinely essential to protocol operation, they
   are marked as optional.  Some fields will be essential but have a
   default specified, so they need not be explicitly configured.

   This module structure also applies, where applicable, to the
   operational state and notifications of the model.

2.5.  Position of Address Family in Hierarchy

   This document contains address-family as a node in the hierarchy
   multiple times: both under the interface list, and under the PIM
   instance.

   The reasoning for this is to make it easier for implementations in
   which configuration options are not supported for specific address
   families.

   For these implementations, the restriction that interface
   configuration must be address-family independent may either be
   expressed as a vendor augmentation of an address-family-independent
   parameter above the address-family level, or by a constraint on the
   base model objects of a form similar to:










Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018                [Page 7]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   deviation "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
     + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
     + "pim-base:address-family" {

     deviate add {
       must "(address-family = 'rt:ipv4' and dr-priority = "
         + "../address-family[address-family = 'rt:ipv6']/"
         + "dr-priority) or "
         + "(address-family = 'rt:ipv6' and dr-priority = "
         + "../address-family[address-family = 'rt:ipv4']/"
         + "dr-priority)" {
         error-message
           "Error: IPv6 DR priority must match IPv4 DR priority.";
         error-app-tag "dr-priority-mismatch";
       }
     }
   }


3.  Module Structure

3.1.  PIM Base Module

   The PIM base module defines the base framework not specific to any
   PIM mode, and is imported by the other modules.  The base module by
   itself does not provide sufficient data for any PIM mode to operate.
   Other mode specific and feature specific modules need to be
   implemented in addition to this module, depending on the feature set
   required by the implementation.

   This model augments the core routing data model "ietf-routing"
   specified in [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis].  The PIM base model
   augments "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" as opposed to
   augmenting "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/rt:control-plane-
   protocol", as the latter would allow multiple protocol instances,
   while the PIM protocol is designed to be enabled or disabled as a
   single protocol instnace on a network instance or a logical network
   element.

3.1.1.  High-level Structure

   The high-level structure of the model is shown below:









Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018                [Page 8]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   module: ietf-pim-base
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols:
       +--rw pim!
          +--rw <global configuration>
          +--ro <global operational state>
          +--rw address-family* [address-family]
          |  +--rw address-family        identityref
          |  +--rw <per address family configuration>
          |  +--ro <per address family operational state>
          +--rw interfaces
             +--rw interface* [name]
                +--rw name              if:interface-ref
                +--rw address-family* [address-family]
                   +--rw address-family       identityref
                   +--rw <per interface configuration>
                   +--ro <per interface operational state>
                   +--ro neighbors
                      +--ro ipv4-neighbor* [address]
                      |  +--ro address            inet:ipv4-address
                      |  +--ro <IPv4 per neighbor operational state>
                      +--ro ipv6-neighbor* [address]
                         +--ro address            inet:ipv6-address
                         +--ro <IPv4 per neighbor operational state>


   The presence of the top-level container "pim" enables the PIM
   protocols.

3.1.2.  Global Data

   The global configuration and operational state data covers the
   support for graceful restart in the PIM base model.  Additional
   features can be added by augmentation if required by an
   implementation.

3.1.3.  Per Address Family Data

   The support for per address family data is shown below:













Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018                [Page 9]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   +--rw pim!
      +--rw address-family* [address-family]
      |  +--rw address-family        identityref
      |  +--rw graceful-restart
               ...
      |  +--ro statistics
      |  |  +--ro discontinuity-time?   yang:date-and-time
      |  |  +--ro error
      |  |  |  +--ro assert?                       yang:counter32
                     ...
      |  |  +--ro queue
      |  |  |  +--ro size?       uint32
      |  |  |  +--ro overflow?   yang:counter32
      |  |  +--ro received
      |  |  |  +--ro assert?                       yang:counter32
                     ...
      |  |  +--ro sent
      |  |     +--ro assert?                       yang:counter32
                     ...
      |  +--ro topology-tree-info
      |  |  +--ro ipv4-route* [group source-address is-rpt]
      |  |  |  +--ro group
      |  |  |  |       rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address
      |  |  |  +--ro source-address
      |  |  |  |       rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address
      |  |  |  +--ro is-rpt                boolean
      |  |  +--ro ipv6-route* [group source-address is-rpt]
      |  |     +--ro group
      |  |     |       rt-types:ipv6-multicast-group-address
      |  |     +--ro source-address
      |  |     |       rt-types:ipv6-multicast-source-address
      |  |     +--ro is-rpt                boolean
                     ...
      |  |     +--ro incoming-interface?   if:interface-ref
                     ...
      |  |     +--ro outgoing-interface* [name]
      |  |        +--ro name          if:interface-ref
      |  |        +--ro expiration?   rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
      |  |        +--ro up-time?      rt-types:timeticks64
      |  |        +--ro jp-state?     enumeration


   This is the location that most of the PIM RP module (ietf-pim-rp)
   augments.  Each of the mode specific modules also augments this
   schema tree.






Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 10]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


3.1.4.  PIM Interface Modeling

   The configuration and operational state data of PIM interfaces is
   modeled as below:


   +--rw pim!
      +--rw interfaces
         +--rw interface* [name]
            +--rw name              if:interface-ref
            +--rw address-family* [address-family]
               +--rw address-family       identityref
               +--rw bfd {bfd}?
                     ...
               +--rw dr-priority?         uint32 {intf-dr-priority}?
               +--rw hello-interval?      rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
               |       {intf-hello-interval}?
               +--rw (hello-holdtime-or-multiplier)?
               |  +--:(holdtime) {intf-hello-holdtime}?
               |  |  +--rw hello-holdtime?
               |  |          rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
               |  +--:(multiplier) {intf-hello-multiplier}?
               |     +--rw hello-multiplier?
               |             rt-types:timer-multiplier
               +--rw jp-interval?         rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
               |       {intf-jp-interval}?
               +--rw (jp-holdtime-or-multiplier)?
               |  +--:(holdtime) {intf-jp-holdtime}?
               |  |  +--rw jp-holdtime?
               |  |          rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
               |  +--:(multiplier) {intf-jp-multiplier}?
               |     +--rw jp-multiplier?
               |             rt-types:timer-multiplier
               +--rw override-interval?   uint16
               |       {intf-override-interval}?
               +--rw propagation-delay?   uint16
               |       {intf-propagation-delay}?
               +--ro oper-status?         enumeration
               +--ro gen-id?              uint32
               +--ro hello-expiration?    rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
               +--ro ipv4
               |  +--ro address*      inet:ipv4-address
               |  +--ro dr-address?   inet:ipv4-address
               +--ro ipv6
               |  +--ro address*      inet:ipv6-address
               |  +--ro dr-address?   inet:ipv6-address





Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 11]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   The support for bfd is achieved by using a grouping provided by an
   external module ietf-bfd-types, defined in [I-D.ietf-bfd-yang].

3.1.5.  Neighbor Modeling

   For each PIM interface, there can be a list of neighbors, which
   conatin operational state data.  To model such data, the following
   structure is specified:


   +--rw pim!
      +--rw interfaces
         +--rw interface* [name]
            +--rw address-family* [address-family]
               +--ro neighbors
                  +--ro ipv4-neighbor* [address]
                  |  +--ro address            inet:ipv4-address
                  |  +--ro bfd-status?        enumeration
                  |  +--ro expiration?
                  |  |       rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
                  |  +--ro dr-priority?       uint32
                  |  +--ro gen-id?            uint32
                  |  +--ro lan-prune-delay
                  |  |  +--ro present?             boolean
                  |  |  +--ro override-interval?   uint16
                  |  |  +--ro propagation-delay?   uint16
                  |  |  +--ro t-bit?               boolean
                  |  +--ro up-time?           rt-types:timeticks64
                  +--ro ipv6-neighbor* [address]
                     +--ro address            inet:ipv6-address
                     +--ro bfd-status?        enumeration
                     +--ro expiration?
                     |       rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
                     +--ro dr-priority?       uint32
                     +--ro gen-id?            uint32
                     +--ro lan-prune-delay
                     |  +--ro present?             boolean
                     |  +--ro override-interval?   uint16
                     |  +--ro propagation-delay?   uint16
                     |  +--ro t-bit?               boolean
                     +--ro up-time?           rt-types:timeticks64


3.1.6.  Notifications

   The PIM base module also defines the notifications for PIM interface
   and neighbor events, as shown below:




Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 12]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     notifications:
       +---n pim-neighbor-event
       |  +--ro event-type?          neighbor-event-type
       |  +--ro interface-ref?       leafref
       |  +--ro interface-af-ref?    leafref
       |  +--ro neighbor-ipv4-ref?   leafref
       |  +--ro neighbor-ipv6-ref?   leafref
       |  +--ro up-time?             rt-types:timeticks64
       +---n pim-interface-event
          +--ro event-type?      interface-event-type
          +--ro interface-ref?   leafref
          +--ro ipv4
          |  +--ro address*      inet:ipv4-address
          |  +--ro dr-address?   inet:ipv4-address
          +--ro ipv6
             +--ro address*      inet:ipv6-address
             +--ro dr-address?   inet:ipv6-address


3.2.  PIM RP module

   The PIM RP module augments the PIM base module to define the
   configuration and operational state information scoped to RP related
   features:


   module: ietf-pim-rp
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw rp
          +--rw static-rp
                ...
          +--rw bsr {bsr}?
                ...
          +--ro rp-list
                ...
          +--ro rp-mappings
                ...


   This module is shared by the PIM-SM mode and the PIM-BIDIR mode, but
   not by the PIM-DM mode.  PIM-SM module and PIM-BIDIR module augment
   this module to cover mode specific data.

   The following sections describe the features and capabilities
   coverred in this module.





Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 13]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


3.2.1.  Static RP

   Static RPs can be configured by using the following portion of the
   module:


   +--rw rp
      +--rw static-rp
      |  +--rw ipv4-rp* [rp-address]
      |  |  +--rw rp-address    inet:ipv4-address
      |  +--rw ipv6-rp* [rp-address]
      |     +--rw rp-address    inet:ipv6-address


3.2.2.  BSR

   The support for BSR includes both configuration data and operational
   state data, as shown below:

































Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 14]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   +--rw rp
      +--rw bsr {bsr}?
      |  +--rw bsr-candidate!
      |  |  +--rw (interface-or-address)?
      |  |  |  +--:(interface) {candidate-interface}?
      |  |  |  |  +--rw interface           if:interface-ref
      |  |  |  +--:(ipv4-address) {candidate-ipv4}?
      |  |  |  |  +--rw ipv4-address        inet:ipv4-address
      |  |  |  +--:(ipv6-address) {candidate-ipv6}?
      |  |  |     +--rw ipv6-address        inet:ipv6-address
      |  |  +--rw hash-mask-length    uint8
      |  |  +--rw priority?           uint8
      |  +--rw rp-candidate
      |  |  +--rw interface* [name] {candidate-interface}?
      |  |  |  +--rw name           if:interface-ref
      |  |  |  +--rw policy-name?   string
      |  |  |  +--rw mode?          identityref
      |  |  +--rw ipv4-address* [address] {candidate-ipv4}?
      |  |  |  +--rw address        inet:ipv4-address
      |  |  |  +--rw policy-name?   string
      |  |  |  +--rw mode?          identityref
      |  |  +--rw ipv6-address* [address] {candidate-ipv6}?
      |  |     +--rw address        inet:ipv6-address
      |  |     +--rw policy-name?   string
      |  |     +--rw mode?          identityref
      |  +--ro bsr
      |  |  +--ro address?            inet:ip-address
      |  |  +--ro hash-mask-length?   uint8
      |  |  +--ro priority?           uint8
      |  |  +--ro up-time?            rt-types:timeticks64
      |  +--ro (election-state)? {bsr-election-state}?
      |  |  +--:(candidate)
      |  |  |  +--ro candidate-bsr-state?               enumeration
      |  |  +--:(non-candidate)
      |  |     +--ro non-candidate-bsr-state?           enumeration
      |  +--ro bsr-next-bootstrap?                uint16
      |  +--ro rp
      |  |  +--ro rp-address?    inet:ip-address
      |  |  +--ro policy-name?   string
      |  |  +--ro up-time?       rt-types:timeticks64
      |  +--ro rp-candidate-next-advertisement?   uint16


3.2.3.  RP State Data

   This portion of the model provides the operational state information
   for all RPs on the router, including the statically configured RPs
   and the BSR elected RPs.



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 15]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   +--rw rp
      +--ro rp-list
      |  +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address mode]
      |  |  +--ro rp-address             inet:ipv4-address
      |  |  +--ro mode                   identityref
      |  |  +--ro info-source-address?   inet:ipv4-address
      |  |  +--ro info-source-type?      identityref
      |  |  +--ro up-time?               rt-types:timeticks64
      |  |  +--ro expiration?            rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
      |  +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address mode]
      |     +--ro rp-address             inet:ipv6-address
      |     +--ro mode                   identityref
      |     +--ro info-source-address?   inet:ipv6-address
      |     +--ro info-source-type?      identityref
      |     +--ro up-time?               rt-types:timeticks64
      |     +--ro expiration?            rt-types:timer-value-seconds16


3.2.4.  RP to Group Mappings

   The operational state data of the mappings between RPs and multicast
   groups is modeled as follows:


   +--rw rp
      +--ro rp-mappings
         +--ro ipv4-rp* [group rp-address]
         |  +--ro group         inet:ipv4-prefix
         |  +--ro rp-address    inet:ipv4-address
         |  +--ro up-time?      rt-types:timeticks64
         |  +--ro expiration?   rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
         +--ro ipv6-rp* [group rp-address]
            +--ro group         inet:ipv6-prefix
            +--ro rp-address    inet:ipv6-address
            +--ro up-time?      rt-types:timeticks64
            +--ro expiration?   rt-types:timer-value-seconds16


3.2.5.  Notifications

   The PIM RP module also defines the notifications for RP related
   events, as shown below:









Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 16]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     notifications:
       +---n pim-rp-event
          +--ro event-type?        rp-event-type
          +--ro instance-af-ref?   leafref
          +--ro group?             rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
          +--ro rp-address?        inet:ip-address
          +--ro is-rpt?            boolean
          +--ro mode?              pim-base:pim-mode
          +--ro message-origin?    inet:ip-address


3.3.  PIM-SM module

   The PIM-SM module covers Sparse Mode modeling, including PIM-ASM and
   PIM-SSM.  This module has dependencies on PIM base module and PIM RP
   module, both of which are augemented by this module.

   The augmentation to the address-family branch of the PIM base module
   is shown below:


   module: ietf-pim-sm
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw sm
          +--rw asm
          |  +--rw anycast-rp!
          |  |  +--rw ipv4-anycast-rp* [anycast-address rp-address]
          |  |  |  +--rw anycast-address    inet:ipv4-address
          |  |  |  +--rw rp-address         inet:ipv4-address
          |  |  +--rw ipv6-anycast-rp* [anycast-address rp-address]
          |  |     +--rw anycast-address    inet:ipv6-address
          |  |     +--rw rp-address         inet:ipv6-address
          |  +--rw spt-switch
          |     +--rw infinity! {spt-switch-infinity}?
          |        +--rw policy-name?   string {spt-switch-policy}?
          +--rw ssm!
             +--rw range-policy?   string


   To support SM mode on an interface, this module augments the the
   interface branch of the PIM base module, as follows:









Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 17]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   module: ietf-pim-sm
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw sm!
          +--rw passive?   empty


   This module also augments the PIM RP module to allow an RP to be
   configured in the PIM-SM mode:


   module: ietf-pim-sm
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp:
       +--rw sm!
          +--rw policy-name?   string
          +--rw override?      boolean {static-rp-override}?
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp:
       +--rw sm!
          +--rw policy-name?   string
          +--rw override?      boolean {static-rp-override}?


3.4.  PIM-DM module

   The PIM-DM module covers Dense Mode modeling.  This module augments
   the PIM base module, but it has no dependency on the PIM RP module.

   module: ietf-pim-dm
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw dm!
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw dm!


3.5.  PIM-BIDIR module

   The PIM-BIDIR module covers Bidirectional PIM modeling.  Like PIM-SM,
   this module augments both PIM base module and PIM RP module.

   The followings are the augmentations to the PIM base module, on the
   address-family, the interface, and the neighbor branches:






Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 18]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   module: ietf-pim-bidir
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw bidir!

     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw bidir!
          +--rw df-election {intf-df-election}?
             +--rw offer-interval?     uint16
             +--rw backoff-interval?   uint16
             +--rw offer-multiplier?   uint8

     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family
   /pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv4-neighbor:
       +--ro bidir-capable?   boolean

     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family
   /pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv6-neighbor:
       +--ro bidir-capable?   boolean


   This module also augments the PIM RP module to extend the
   capabilities of RP for the PIM-BIDIR mode:

























Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 19]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   module: ietf-pim-bidir
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp:
       +--rw bidir!
          +--rw policy-name?   string
          +--rw override?      boolean {static-rp-override}?

     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp:
       +--rw bidir!
          +--rw policy-name?   string
          +--rw override?      boolean {static-rp-override}?

     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp:
       +--ro bidir
          +--ro df-election
          |  +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address]
          |  |  +--ro rp-address    inet:ipv4-address
          |  +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address]
          |     +--ro rp-address    inet:ipv6-address
          +--ro interface-df-election
             +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address interface-name]
             |  +--ro rp-address                  inet:ipv4-address
             |  +--ro interface-name              if:interface-ref
             |  +--ro df-address?                 inet:ipv4-address
             |  +--ro interface-state?            identityref
             |  +--ro up-time?                    rt-types:timeticks64
             |  +--ro winner-metric?              uint32
             |  +--ro winner-metric-preference?   uint32
             +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address interface-name]
                +--ro rp-address                  inet:ipv6-address
                +--ro interface-name              if:interface-ref
                +--ro df-address?                 inet:ipv6-address
                +--ro interface-state?            identityref
                +--ro up-time?                    rt-types:timeticks64
                +--ro winner-metric?              uint32
                +--ro winner-metric-preference?   uint32


4.  Complete Tree Structure

4.1.  PIM base module

   module: ietf-pim-base
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols:
       +--rw pim!
          +--rw graceful-restart



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 20]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


          |  +--rw enabled?    boolean
          |  +--rw duration?   uint16
          +--rw address-family* [address-family]
          |  +--rw address-family        identityref
          |  +--rw graceful-restart
          |  |  +--rw enabled?    boolean
          |  |  +--rw duration?   uint16
          |  +--ro statistics
          |  |  +--ro discontinuity-time?   yang:date-and-time
          |  |  +--ro error
          |  |  |  +--ro assert?                       yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro bsr?                          yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro candidate-rp-advertisement?   yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro df-election?                  yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro graft?                        yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro graft-ack?                    yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro hello?                        yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro join-prune?                   yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro register?                     yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro register-stop?                yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro state-refresh?                yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro checksum?                     yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro format?                       yang:counter32
          |  |  +--ro queue
          |  |  |  +--ro size?       uint32
          |  |  |  +--ro overflow?   yang:counter32
          |  |  +--ro received
          |  |  |  +--ro assert?                       yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro bsr?                          yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro candidate-rp-advertisement?   yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro df-election?                  yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro graft?                        yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro graft-ack?                    yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro hello?                        yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro join-prune?                   yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro register?                     yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro register-stop?                yang:counter32
          |  |  |  +--ro state-refresh?                yang:counter32
          |  |  +--ro sent
          |  |     +--ro assert?                       yang:counter32
          |  |     +--ro bsr?                          yang:counter32
          |  |     +--ro candidate-rp-advertisement?   yang:counter32
          |  |     +--ro df-election?                  yang:counter32
          |  |     +--ro graft?                        yang:counter32
          |  |     +--ro graft-ack?                    yang:counter32
          |  |     +--ro hello?                        yang:counter32
          |  |     +--ro join-prune?                   yang:counter32
          |  |     +--ro register?                     yang:counter32



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 21]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


          |  |     +--ro register-stop?                yang:counter32
          |  |     +--ro state-refresh?                yang:counter32
          |  +--ro topology-tree-info
          |     +--ro ipv4-route* [group source-address is-rpt]
          |     |  +--ro group
          |     |  |       rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address
          |     |  +--ro source-address
          |     |  |       rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address
          |     |  +--ro is-rpt                boolean
          |     |  +--ro expiration?
          |     |  |       rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
          |     |  +--ro incoming-interface?   if:interface-ref
          |     |  +--ro is-spt?               boolean
          |     |  +--ro mode?                 pim-mode
          |     |  +--ro msdp-learned?         boolean
          |     |  +--ro rp-address?           inet:ip-address
          |     |  +--ro rpf-neighbor?         inet:ip-address
          |     |  +--ro up-time?              rt-types:timeticks64
          |     |  +--ro outgoing-interface* [name]
          |     |     +--ro name          if:interface-ref
          |     |     +--ro expiration?   rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
          |     |     +--ro up-time?      rt-types:timeticks64
          |     |     +--ro jp-state?     enumeration
          |     +--ro ipv6-route* [group source-address is-rpt]
          |        +--ro group
          |        |       rt-types:ipv6-multicast-group-address
          |        +--ro source-address
          |        |       rt-types:ipv6-multicast-source-address
          |        +--ro is-rpt                boolean
          |        +--ro expiration?
          |        |       rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
          |        +--ro incoming-interface?   if:interface-ref
          |        +--ro is-spt?               boolean
          |        +--ro mode?                 pim-mode
          |        +--ro msdp-learned?         boolean
          |        +--ro rp-address?           inet:ip-address
          |        +--ro rpf-neighbor?         inet:ip-address
          |        +--ro up-time?              rt-types:timeticks64
          |        +--ro outgoing-interface* [name]
          |           +--ro name          if:interface-ref
          |           +--ro expiration?   rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
          |           +--ro up-time?      rt-types:timeticks64
          |           +--ro jp-state?     enumeration
          +--rw interfaces
             +--rw interface* [name]
                +--rw name              if:interface-ref
                +--rw address-family* [address-family]
                   +--rw address-family       identityref



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 22]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                   +--rw bfd {bfd}?
                   |  +--rw enable?                     boolean
                   |  +--rw local-multiplier?           multiplier
                   |  +--rw (interval-config-type)?
                   |     +--:(tx-rx-intervals)
                   |     |  +--rw desired-min-tx-interval     uint32
                   |     |  +--rw required-min-rx-interval    uint32
                   |     +--:(single-interval)
                   |        +--rw min-interval                uint32
                   +--rw dr-priority?         uint32 {intf-dr-priority}?
                   +--rw hello-interval?
    rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
                   |       {intf-hello-interval}?
                   +--rw (hello-holdtime-or-multiplier)?
                   |  +--:(holdtime) {intf-hello-holdtime}?
                   |  |  +--rw hello-holdtime?
                   |  |          rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
                   |  +--:(multiplier) {intf-hello-multiplier}?
                   |     +--rw hello-multiplier?
                   |             rt-types:timer-multiplier
                   +--rw jp-interval?
    rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
                   |       {intf-jp-interval}?
                   +--rw (jp-holdtime-or-multiplier)?
                   |  +--:(holdtime) {intf-jp-holdtime}?
                   |  |  +--rw jp-holdtime?
                   |  |          rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
                   |  +--:(multiplier) {intf-jp-multiplier}?
                   |     +--rw jp-multiplier?
                   |             rt-types:timer-multiplier
                   +--rw override-interval?   uint16
                   |       {intf-override-interval}?
                   +--rw propagation-delay?   uint16
                   |       {intf-propagation-delay}?
                   +--ro oper-status?         enumeration
                   +--ro gen-id?              uint32
                   +--ro hello-expiration?
    rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
                   +--ro ipv4
                   |  +--ro address*      inet:ipv4-address
                   |  +--ro dr-address?   inet:ipv4-address
                   +--ro ipv6
                   |  +--ro address*      inet:ipv6-address
                   |  +--ro dr-address?   inet:ipv6-address
                   +--ro neighbors
                      +--ro ipv4-neighbor* [address]
                      |  +--ro address            inet:ipv4-address
                      |  +--ro bfd-status?        enumeration



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 23]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                      |  +--ro expiration?
                      |  |       rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
                      |  +--ro dr-priority?       uint32
                      |  +--ro gen-id?            uint32
                      |  +--ro lan-prune-delay
                      |  |  +--ro present?             boolean
                      |  |  +--ro override-interval?   uint16
                      |  |  +--ro propagation-delay?   uint16
                      |  |  +--ro t-bit?               boolean
                      |  +--ro up-time?           rt-types:timeticks64
                      +--ro ipv6-neighbor* [address]
                         +--ro address            inet:ipv6-address
                         +--ro bfd-status?        enumeration
                         +--ro expiration?
                         |       rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
                         +--ro dr-priority?       uint32
                         +--ro gen-id?            uint32
                         +--ro lan-prune-delay
                         |  +--ro present?             boolean
                         |  +--ro override-interval?   uint16
                         |  +--ro propagation-delay?   uint16
                         |  +--ro t-bit?               boolean
                         +--ro up-time?           rt-types:timeticks64

     notifications:
       +---n pim-neighbor-event
       |  +--ro event-type?          neighbor-event-type
       |  +--ro interface-ref?       leafref
       |  +--ro interface-af-ref?    leafref
       |  +--ro neighbor-ipv4-ref?   leafref
       |  +--ro neighbor-ipv6-ref?   leafref
       |  +--ro up-time?             rt-types:timeticks64
       +---n pim-interface-event
          +--ro event-type?      interface-event-type
          +--ro interface-ref?   leafref
          +--ro ipv4
          |  +--ro address*      inet:ipv4-address
          |  +--ro dr-address?   inet:ipv4-address
          +--ro ipv6
             +--ro address*      inet:ipv6-address
             +--ro dr-address?   inet:ipv6-address


4.2.  PIM RP module

   module: ietf-pim-rp
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family:



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 24]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


       +--rw rp
          +--rw static-rp
          |  +--rw ipv4-rp* [rp-address]
          |  |  +--rw rp-address    inet:ipv4-address
          |  +--rw ipv6-rp* [rp-address]
          |     +--rw rp-address    inet:ipv6-address
          +--rw bsr {bsr}?
          |  +--rw bsr-candidate!
          |  |  +--rw (interface-or-address)?
          |  |  |  +--:(interface) {candidate-interface}?
          |  |  |  |  +--rw interface           if:interface-ref
          |  |  |  +--:(ipv4-address) {candidate-ipv4}?
          |  |  |  |  +--rw ipv4-address        inet:ipv4-address
          |  |  |  +--:(ipv6-address) {candidate-ipv6}?
          |  |  |     +--rw ipv6-address        inet:ipv6-address
          |  |  +--rw hash-mask-length    uint8
          |  |  +--rw priority?           uint8
          |  +--rw rp-candidate
          |  |  +--rw interface* [name] {candidate-interface}?
          |  |  |  +--rw name           if:interface-ref
          |  |  |  +--rw policy-name?   string
          |  |  |  +--rw mode?          identityref
          |  |  +--rw ipv4-address* [address] {candidate-ipv4}?
          |  |  |  +--rw address        inet:ipv4-address
          |  |  |  +--rw policy-name?   string
          |  |  |  +--rw mode?          identityref
          |  |  +--rw ipv6-address* [address] {candidate-ipv6}?
          |  |     +--rw address        inet:ipv6-address
          |  |     +--rw policy-name?   string
          |  |     +--rw mode?          identityref
          |  +--ro bsr
          |  |  +--ro address?            inet:ip-address
          |  |  +--ro hash-mask-length?   uint8
          |  |  +--ro priority?           uint8
          |  |  +--ro up-time?            rt-types:timeticks64
          |  +--ro (election-state)? {bsr-election-state}?
          |  |  +--:(candidate)
          |  |  |  +--ro candidate-bsr-state?               enumeration
          |  |  +--:(non-candidate)
          |  |     +--ro non-candidate-bsr-state?           enumeration
          |  +--ro bsr-next-bootstrap?                uint16
          |  +--ro rp
          |  |  +--ro rp-address?    inet:ip-address
          |  |  +--ro policy-name?   string
          |  |  +--ro up-time?       rt-types:timeticks64
          |  +--ro rp-candidate-next-advertisement?   uint16
          +--ro rp-list
          |  +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address mode]



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 25]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


          |  |  +--ro rp-address             inet:ipv4-address
          |  |  +--ro mode                   identityref
          |  |  +--ro info-source-address?   inet:ipv4-address
          |  |  +--ro info-source-type?      identityref
          |  |  +--ro up-time?               rt-types:timeticks64
          |  |  +--ro expiration?
    rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
          |  +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address mode]
          |     +--ro rp-address             inet:ipv6-address
          |     +--ro mode                   identityref
          |     +--ro info-source-address?   inet:ipv6-address
          |     +--ro info-source-type?      identityref
          |     +--ro up-time?               rt-types:timeticks64
          |     +--ro expiration?
    rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
          +--ro rp-mappings
             +--ro ipv4-rp* [group rp-address]
             |  +--ro group         inet:ipv4-prefix
             |  +--ro rp-address    inet:ipv4-address
             |  +--ro up-time?      rt-types:timeticks64
             |  +--ro expiration?   rt-types:timer-value-seconds16
             +--ro ipv6-rp* [group rp-address]
                +--ro group         inet:ipv6-prefix
                +--ro rp-address    inet:ipv6-address
                +--ro up-time?      rt-types:timeticks64
                +--ro expiration?   rt-types:timer-value-seconds16

     notifications:
       +---n pim-rp-event
          +--ro event-type?        rp-event-type
          +--ro instance-af-ref?   leafref
          +--ro group?             rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address
          +--ro rp-address?        inet:ip-address
          +--ro is-rpt?            boolean
          +--ro mode?              pim-base:pim-mode
          +--ro message-origin?    inet:ip-address


4.3.  PIM-SM module












Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 26]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   module: ietf-pim-sm
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw sm
          +--rw asm
          |  +--rw anycast-rp!
          |  |  +--rw ipv4-anycast-rp* [anycast-address rp-address]
          |  |  |  +--rw anycast-address    inet:ipv4-address
          |  |  |  +--rw rp-address         inet:ipv4-address
          |  |  +--rw ipv6-anycast-rp* [anycast-address rp-address]
          |  |     +--rw anycast-address    inet:ipv6-address
          |  |     +--rw rp-address         inet:ipv6-address
          |  +--rw spt-switch
          |     +--rw infinity! {spt-switch-infinity}?
          |        +--rw policy-name?   string {spt-switch-policy}?
          +--rw ssm!
             +--rw range-policy?   string
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw sm!
          +--rw passive?   empty
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp:
       +--rw sm!
          +--rw policy-name?   string
          +--rw override?      boolean {static-rp-override}?
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp:
       +--rw sm!
          +--rw policy-name?   string
          +--rw override?      boolean {static-rp-override}?


4.4.  PIM-DM module

   module: ietf-pim-dm
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw dm!
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw dm!









Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 27]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


4.5.  PIM-BIDIR module

   module: ietf-pim-bidir
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw bidir!
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family:
       +--rw bidir!
          +--rw df-election {intf-df-election}?
             +--rw offer-interval?     uint16
             +--rw backoff-interval?   uint16
             +--rw offer-multiplier?   uint8
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp:
       +--rw bidir!
          +--rw policy-name?   string
          +--rw override?      boolean {static-rp-override}?
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp:
       +--rw bidir!
          +--rw policy-name?   string
          +--rw override?      boolean {static-rp-override}?
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp:
       +--ro bidir
          +--ro df-election
          |  +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address]
          |  |  +--ro rp-address    inet:ipv4-address
          |  +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address]
          |     +--ro rp-address    inet:ipv6-address
          +--ro interface-df-election
             +--ro ipv4-rp* [rp-address interface-name]
             |  +--ro rp-address                  inet:ipv4-address
             |  +--ro interface-name              if:interface-ref
             |  +--ro df-address?                 inet:ipv4-address
             |  +--ro interface-state?            identityref
             |  +--ro up-time?                    rt-types:timeticks64
             |  +--ro winner-metric?              uint32
             |  +--ro winner-metric-preference?   uint32
             +--ro ipv6-rp* [rp-address interface-name]
                +--ro rp-address                  inet:ipv6-address
                +--ro interface-name              if:interface-ref
                +--ro df-address?                 inet:ipv6-address
                +--ro interface-state?            identityref
                +--ro up-time?                    rt-types:timeticks64
                +--ro winner-metric?              uint32
                +--ro winner-metric-preference?   uint32



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 28]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family
   /pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv4-neighbor:
       +--ro bidir-capable?   boolean
     augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim
   /pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/pim-base:address-family
   /pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv6-neighbor:
       +--ro bidir-capable?   boolean


5.  Relationship to the PIM-STD-MIB

   The following sections describe the mappings between the objects in
   the PIM-STD-MIB defined in [RFC5060] and the YANG data nodes defined
   in this document.

5.1.  pimInterfaceTable

   pimInterfaceTable is mapped to pim/interfaces/interface.  The key of
   pimInterfaceTable is pimInterfaceIfIndex and pimInterfaceIPVersion,
   while the key of the "interface" list in YANG is the node "name".
   For each value of pimInterfaceIPVersion, the "interface" list
   contains a corresponding sublist whose key is the node "address-
   family".

   The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
   objects of pimInterfaceTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.

       +------------------------+----------------------------------+
       | YANG node              | PIM-STD-MIB object               |
       +------------------------+----------------------------------+
       | address-family         | pimInterfaceAddressType          |
       | ipv4/address           | pimInterfaceAddress              |
       | ipv6/address           |                                  |
       | gen-id                 | pimInterfaceGenerationIDValue    |
       | ipv4/dr-address        | pimInterfaceDR                   |
       | ipv6/dr-address        |                                  |
       | dr-priority            | pimInterfaceDRPriority           |
       | hello-interval         | pimInterfaceHelloInterval        |
       | hello-holdtime         | pimInterfaceHelloHoldtime        |
       | jp-interval            | pimInterfaceJoinPruneInterval    |
       | jp-holdtime            | pimInterfaceJoinPruneHoldtime    |
       | bidir/offer-multiplier | pimInterfaceDFElectionRobustness |
       | propagation-delay      | pimInterfacePropagationDelay     |
       | override-interval      | pimInterfaceOverrideInterval     |
       +------------------------+----------------------------------+

             Table 2: YANG Nodes and pimInterfaceTable Objects



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 29]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


5.2.  pimNeighborTable

   pimNeighborTable is mapped to pim/interfaces/interface/neighbors/
   ipv4-neighbor and pim/interfaces/interface/neighbors/ipv6-neighbor.

   The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
   objects of pimNeighborTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.

    +------------------------------+---------------------------------+
    | YANG node                    | PIM-STD-MIB object              |
    +------------------------------+---------------------------------+
    | ipv4-neighbor                | pimNeighborAddressType          |
    | ipv6-neighbor                |                                 |
    | address                      | pimNeighborAddress              |
    | gen-id                       | pimNeighborGenerationIDValue    |
    | up-time                      | pimNeighborUpTime               |
    | expiration                   | pimNeighborExpiryTime           |
    | dr-priority                  | pimNeighborDRPriority           |
    | lan-prune-delay/present      | pimNeighborLanPruneDelayPresent |
    | lan-prune-delay/t-bit        | pimNeighborTBit                 |
    | lan-prune-delay/             | pimNeighborPropagationDelay     |
    | propagation-delay            |                                 |
    | lan-prune-delay/             | pimNeighborOverrideInterval     |
    | override-interval            |                                 |
    | ietf-pim-bidir:bidir-capable | pimNeighborBidirCapable         |
    +------------------------------+---------------------------------+

             Table 3: YANG Nodes and pimNeighborTable Objects

5.3.  pimStarGTable

   pimStarGTable is mapped to pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/
   ipv4-route and pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/ipv6-route, when
   the value of source-address leaf is "ietf-routing-types:*" and the
   value of is-rpt leaf is "false".

   The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
   objects of pimStarGTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.













Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 30]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


           +--------------------+------------------------------+
           | YANG node          | PIM-STD-MIB object           |
           +--------------------+------------------------------+
           | ipv4-route         | pimStarGAddressType          |
           | ipv6-route         |                              |
           | group              | pimStarGGrpAddress           |
           | up-time            | pimStarGUpTime               |
           | mode               | pimStarGPimMode              |
           | rp-address         | pimStarGRPAddressType        |
           | rp-address         | pimStarGRPAddress            |
           | rpf-neighbor       | pimStarGUpstreamNeighborType |
           | rpf-neighbor       | pimStarGUpstreamNeighbor     |
           | incoming-interface | pimStarGRPFIfIndex           |
           +--------------------+------------------------------+

               Table 4: YANG Nodes and pimStarGTable Objects

   In addtion, the object pimStarGPimModeOrigin in pimStarGTable is
   mapped to the node rp/rp-list/ipv4-rp/info-source-type or the node
   rp/rp-list/ipv6-rp/info-source-type in the YANG module ietf-pim-rp.

5.4.  pimSGTable

   pimSGTable is mapped to pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/
   ipv4-route and pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/ipv6-route, when
   the value of source-address leaf is not "ietf-routing-types:*" and
   the value of is-rpt leaf is "false".

   The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
   objects of pimSGTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.

             +--------------------+--------------------------+
             | YANG node          | PIM-STD-MIB object       |
             +--------------------+--------------------------+
             | ipv4-route         | pimSGAddressType         |
             | ipv6-route         |                          |
             | group              | pimSGGrpAddress          |
             | source-address     | pimSGSrcAddress          |
             | up-time            | pimSGUpTime              |
             | mode               | pimSGPimMode             |
             | rpf-neighbor       | pimStarGUpstreamNeighbor |
             | incoming-interface | pimStarGRPFIfIndex       |
             | is-spt             | pimSGSPTBit              |
             | expiration         | pimSGKeepaliveTimer      |
             +--------------------+--------------------------+

                Table 5: YANG Nodes and pimSGTable Objects




Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 31]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


5.5.  pimSGRptTable

   pimSGRptTable is mapped to pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/
   ipv4-route and pim/address-family/topology-tree-info/ipv6-route, when
   the value of is-rpt leaf is "true".

   The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
   objects of pimSGRptTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.

                 +----------------+---------------------+
                 | YANG node      | PIM-STD-MIB object  |
                 +----------------+---------------------+
                 | ipv4-route     | pimStarGAddressType |
                 | ipv6-route     |                     |
                 | group          | pimStarGGrpAddress  |
                 | source-address | pimSGRptSrcAddress  |
                 | up-time        | pimSGRptUpTime      |
                 +----------------+---------------------+

               Table 6: YANG Nodes and pimSGRptTable Objects

5.6.  pimBidirDFElectionTable

   pimBidirDFElectionTable is mapped to pim/address-family/rp/bidir/
   interface-df-election/ipv4-rp and pim/address-family/rp/bidir/
   interface-df-election/ipv6-rp.  The key of
   pimBidirDFElectionTable includes pimBidirDFElectionIfIndex whose type
   is InterfaceIndex, while the YANG lists use a node "name" with the
   type string instead.

   The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
   objects of pimBidirDFElectionTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.

    +--------------------------+-------------------------------------+
    | YANG node                | PIM-STD-MIB object                  |
    +--------------------------+-------------------------------------+
    | ipv4-rp                  | pimBidirDFElectionAddressType       |
    | ipv6-rp                  |                                     |
    | rp-address               | pimBidirDFElectionRPAddress         |
    | df-address               | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerAddressType |
    |                          | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerAddress     |
    | up-time                  | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerUpTime      |
    | winner-metric-preference | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerMetricPref  |
    | winner-metric-preference | pimBidirDFElectionWinnerMetric      |
    | interface-state          | pimBidirDFElectionState             |
    +--------------------------+-------------------------------------+

          Table 7: YANG Nodes and pimBidirDFElectionTable Objects



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 32]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


5.7.  pimStaticRPTable

   pimStaticRPTable is mapped to pim/address-family/rp/static-rp/ipv4-rp
   and pim/address-family/rp/static-rp/ipv6-rp.

   The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
   objects of pimStaticRPTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.

              +----------------+----------------------------+
              | YANG node      | PIM-STD-MIB object         |
              +----------------+----------------------------+
              | ipv4-rp        | pimStaticRPAddressType     |
              | ipv6-rp        |                            |
              | rp-address     | pimStaticRPRPAddress       |
              | bidir          | pimStaticRPPimMode         |
              | sm             |                            |
              | bidir/override | pimStaticRPOverrideDynamic |
              | sm/override    |                            |
              +----------------+----------------------------+

             Table 8: YANG Nodes and pimStaticRPTable Objects

5.8.  pimAnycastRPSetTable

   pimAnycastRPSetTable is mapped to pim/address-family/sm/asm/anycast-
   rp/ipv4-anycast-rp and pim/address-family/sm/asm/anycast-rp/ipv6-
   anycast-rp.

   The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
   objects of pimAnycastRPSetTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.

            +-----------------+-------------------------------+
            | YANG node       | PIM-STD-MIB object            |
            +-----------------+-------------------------------+
            | ipv4-anycast-rp | pimAnycastRPSetAddressType    |
            | ipv6-anycast-rp |                               |
            | anycast-address | pimAnycastRPSetAnycastAddress |
            | rp-address      | pimAnycastRPSetRouterAddress  |
            +-----------------+-------------------------------+

           Table 9: YANG Nodes and pimAnycastRPSetTable Objects

5.9.  pimGroupMappingTable

   pimGroupMappingTable is mapped to pim/address-family/rp/rp-mappings/
   ipv4-rp and pim/address-family/rp/rp-mappings/ipv6-rp.





Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 33]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding
   objects of pimGroupMappingTable in the PIM-STD-MIB.

              +------------+--------------------------------+
              | YANG node  | PIM-STD-MIB object             |
              +------------+--------------------------------+
              | ipv4-rp    | pimGroupMappingAddressType     |
              | ipv6-rp    |                                |
              | group      | pimGroupMappingGrpAddress      |
              |            | pimGroupMappingGrpPrefixLength |
              | ipv4-rp    | pimGroupMappingRPAddressType   |
              | ipv6-rp    |                                |
              | rp-address | pimGroupMappingRPAddress       |
              |            | pimGroupMappingPimMode         |
              +------------+--------------------------------+

           Table 10: YANG Nodes and pimGroupMappingTable Objects

   In addtion, the object pimGroupMappingPimMode in
   pimGroupMappingTable is mapped to the node rp/rp-list/ipv4-rp/mode or
   the node rp/rp-list/ipv6-rp/mode in the YANG module ietf-pim-rp.

6.  PIM YANG Modules

6.1.  PIM base module


   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-base@2018-01-29.yang"
   module ietf-pim-base {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-base";
     prefix pim-base;

     import ietf-inet-types {
       prefix "inet";
     }

     import ietf-yang-types {
       prefix "yang";
     }

     import ietf-routing-types {
       prefix "rt-types";
     }

     import ietf-interfaces {
       prefix "if";
     }



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 34]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     import ietf-routing {
       prefix "rt";
     }

     import ietf-bfd-types {
       prefix "bfd-types";
     }

     organization
       "IETF PIM Working Group";

     contact
       "WG Web:   <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
        WG List:  <mailto:pim@ietf.org>

        Editor:   Xufeng Liu
                  <mailto:Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>

        Editor:   Pete McAllister
                  <mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>

        Editor:   Anish Peter
                  <mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>

        Editor:   Mahesh Sivakumar
                  <mailto:masivaku@cisco.com>

        Editor:   Yisong Liu
                  <mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>

        Editor:   Fangwei Hu
                  <mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";

     description
       "The module defines a collection of YANG definitions common for
        all PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast) modes.";

     revision 2018-01-29 {
       description
         "Initial revision.";
       reference
         "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM";
     }

     /*
      * Features
      */
     feature bfd {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 35]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


       description
         "Support BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection).";
       reference
         "RFC5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)";
     }

     feature global-graceful-restart {
       description
         "Global configuration for graceful restart support as per
          RFC5306.";
     }

     feature intf-dr-priority {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface DR (Designated Router)
          priority.";
       reference
         "RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.2.";
     }

     feature intf-hello-holdtime {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface hello holdtime.";
       reference
         "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
          (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.3.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
     }

     feature intf-hello-interval {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface hello interval.";
       reference
         "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
          (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
     }

     feature intf-hello-multiplier {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface hello multiplier.";
       reference
         "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
          (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 36]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
     }

     feature intf-jp-interval {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface join prune interval.";
       reference
         "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
          (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
     }

     feature intf-jp-holdtime {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface join prune holdtime.";
       reference
         "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
          (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
     }

     feature intf-jp-multiplier {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface join prune multiplier.";
       reference
         "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
          (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.8.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
     }

     feature intf-propagation-delay {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface propagation delay.";
       reference
         "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
          (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.5.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.3.";
     }

     feature intf-override-interval {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface override interval.";
       reference
         "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 37]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


          (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.3.3.
          RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
          (BIDIR-PIM). Sec. 3.6.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.11.";
     }

     feature per-af-graceful-restart {
       description
         "Per address family configuration for graceful restart support
          as per RFC5306.";
     }

     /*
      * Typedefs
      */
     typedef interface-event-type {
       type enumeration {
         enum up {
           description
             "Neighbor status changed to up.";
         }
         enum down {
           description
             "Neighbor status changed to down.";
         }
         enum new-dr {
           description
             "A new DR (Designated Router) was elected on the connected
              network.";
         }
         enum new-df {
           description
             "A new DF (Designated Forwarder) was elected on the
              connected network.";
         }
       }
       description "Operational status event type for notifications.";
     }

     typedef neighbor-event-type {
       type enumeration {
         enum up {
           description
             "Neighbor status changed to up.";
         }
         enum down {
           description



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 38]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


             "Neighbor status changed to down.";
         }
       }
       description "Operational status event type for notifications.";
     }

     typedef pim-mode {
       type enumeration {
         enum none {
           description
             "PIM is not operating.";
         }
         enum ssm {
           description
             "PIM operates in the Sparse Mode with Source-Specific
              Multicast (SSM).";
         }
         enum asm {
           description
             "PIM operates in the Sparse Mode with Any Source Multicast
              (ASM).";
         }
         enum bidir {
           description
             "PIM operates in the Bidirectional Mode.";
         }
         enum dm {
           description
             "PIM operates in the Dense Mode (DM).";
         }
         enum other {
           description
             "PIM operates in any other mode.";
         }
       }
       description
         "The PIM mode in which a group is operating.";
     }

     /*
      * Groupings
      */
     grouping graceful-restart-container {
       description
         "A grouping defining a container of graceful restart
         attributes.";
       container graceful-restart {
         leaf enabled {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 39]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


           type boolean;
           default false;
           description
             "Enable or disable graceful restart.";
         }
         leaf duration {
           type uint16;
           units seconds;
           default 60;
           description
             "Maximum time for graceful restart to finish.";
         }
         description
           "Container of graceful restart attributes.";
       }
     } // graceful-restart-container

     grouping multicast-route-attributes {
       description
         "A grouping defining multicast route attributes.";

       leaf expiration {
         type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
         description "When the route will expire.";
       }
       leaf incoming-interface {
         type if:interface-ref;
         description
           "Reference to an entry in the global interface
            list.";
       }
       leaf is-spt {
         type boolean;
         description
           "'true' if SPT (Shortest Path Tree) bit is set to indicate
            forwarding is taking place on the (S,G) Shortest Path Tree
            (SPT).";
         reference
           "RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
           (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.1.3.";
       }
       leaf mode {
         type pim-mode;
         description "PIM mode.";
       }
       leaf msdp-learned {
         type boolean;
         description



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 40]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


           "'true' if route is learned from MSDP (Multicast Source
             Discovery Protocol).";
       }
       leaf rp-address {
         type inet:ip-address;
         description "RP (Rendezvous Point) address.";
       }
       leaf rpf-neighbor {
         type inet:ip-address;
         description "RPF (Reverse Path Forwarding) neighbor address.";
       }
       leaf up-time {
         type rt-types:timeticks64;
         description
           "The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since the
            route last transitioned into the active state.";
       }
       list outgoing-interface {
         key "name";
         description
           "A list of outgoing interfaces.";

         leaf name {
           type if:interface-ref;
           description
             "Interface name.";
         }

         leaf expiration {
           type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
           description "Expiring time.";
         }

         leaf up-time {
           type rt-types:timeticks64;
           description
             "The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
              the oper-status of the interface was last changed to
              'up'.";
         }

         leaf jp-state {
           type enumeration {
             enum "no-info" {
               description
                 "The interface has no (*,G) Join state and no timers
                  running.";
             }



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 41]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


             enum "join" {
               description
                 "The interface has Join state.";
             }
             enum "prune-pending" {
               description
                 "The router has received a Prune on this interface from
                  a downstream neighbor and is waiting to see whether
                  the prune will be overridden by another downstream
                  router.  For forwarding purposes, the Prune-Pending
                  state functions exactly like the Join state.";
             }
           }
           description "Join-prune state.";
         }
       }
     } // multicast-route-attributes

     grouping neighbor-state-af-attributes {
       description
         "A grouping defining neighbor per address family attributes.";
       leaf bfd-status {
         type enumeration {
           enum up {
             description
               "BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) is up.";
           }
           enum down {
             description
               "BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) is down.";
           }
         }
         description "BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection) status.";
       }
       leaf expiration {
         type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
         description "Neighbor expiring time.";
       }
       leaf dr-priority {
         type uint32;
         description
           "DR (Designated Router) priority as the preference in the DR
            election process.";
       }
       leaf gen-id {
         type uint32;
         description
           "The value of the Generation ID in the last Hello message



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 42]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


            from the neighbor.";
       }
       container lan-prune-delay {
         description
           "The information of the LAN Prune Delay option in the Hello
            message from the neighbor.";
         leaf present {
           type boolean;
           description
             "'true' if the LAN Prune Delay option is present in the
              last Hello message from the neighbor.";
         }
         leaf override-interval {
           when "../present = 'true'" {
             description
               "Available only when the leaf present is 'true'.";
           }
           type uint16;
           units milliseconds;
           description
             "The value of the Override_Interval field of the LAN Prune
              Delay option in the last Hello message from the neighbor.
              The neighbor uses this value to indicate a short period
              after a Join or Prune to allow other routers on the LAN
              to override the Join or Prune.";
         }
         leaf propagation-delay {
           when "../present = 'true'" {
             description
               "Available only when the leaf present is 'true'.";
           }
           type uint16;
           units milliseconds;
           description
             "The value of the Propagation_Delay field of the LAN Prune
              Delay option in the last Hello message from the neighbor.
              The value is the propagation delay over the local link
              expected by the neighbor.";
         }
         leaf t-bit {
           when "../present = 'true'" {
             description
               "Available only when the leaf present is 'true'.";
           }
           type boolean;
           description
             "'true' if the T bit is set in the LAN Prune Delay option
              in the last Hello message from the neighbor. This flag



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 43]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


              indicates the neighbor's capability to disable Join
              message suppression.";
         }
       }
       leaf up-time {
         type rt-types:timeticks64;
         description
           "The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
            the neighbor relationship has been formed as reachable
            without beeing timed out.";
       }
     } // neighbor-state-af-attributes

     grouping pim-instance-af-state-ref {
       description
         "An absolute reference to a PIM instance address family.";
       leaf instance-af-ref {
         type leafref {
           path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
             + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family/"
             + "pim-base:address-family";
         }
         description
           "Reference to a PIM instance address family.";
       }
     } // pim-instance-af-state-ref

     grouping pim-interface-state-ref {
       description
         "An absolute reference to a PIM interface state.";
       leaf interface-ref {
         type leafref {
           path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
             + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
             + "pim-base:name";
         }
         description
           "Reference to a PIM interface.";
       }
     } // pim-interface-state-ref

     grouping statistics-sent-received {
       description
         "A grouping defining sent and received statistics
          on PIM messages.";
       reference
         "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
          (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.7.1.



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 44]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


          RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
          (BIDIR-PIM). Sec. 3.7.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.9.";
       leaf assert {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of Assert messages, with the message Type
            of 5 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
       }
       leaf bsr {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of Bootstrap messages, with the message Type
            of 4 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
       }
       leaf candidate-rp-advertisement {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of Candidate RP Advertisement messages, with the
            message Type of 8 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
       }
       leaf df-election {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of DF (Designated Forwarder) Election messages,
            with the message Type of 10 in RFC5015.";
       }
       leaf graft {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of Graft messages, with the message Type
            of 6 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
       }
       leaf graft-ack {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of Graft-Ack messages, with the message Type
            of 7 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
       }
       leaf hello {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of Hello messages, with the message Type
            of 0 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
       }
       leaf join-prune {
         type yang:counter32;



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 45]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


         description
           "The number of Join/Prune messages, with the message Type
            of 3 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
       }
       leaf register {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of Register messages, with the message Type
            of 1 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
       }
       leaf register-stop {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of Register Stop messages, with the message Type
            of 2 in RFC3973 and RFC7761.";
       }
       leaf state-refresh {
         type yang:counter32;
         description
           "The number of State Refresh messages, with the message Type
            of 9 in RFC3973.";
       }
     } // statistics-sent-received

     /*
      * Data nodes
      */

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols" {
       description
         "PIM augmentation to the routing instance model.";

       container pim {
         presence
           "Enables the PIM protocol.";
         description
           "PIM configuration and operational data.";

         uses graceful-restart-container {
           if-feature global-graceful-restart;
         }

         list address-family {
           key "address-family";
           description
             "Each list entry for one address family.";
           uses rt:address-family;
           uses graceful-restart-container {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 46]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


             if-feature per-af-graceful-restart;
           }

           container statistics {
             config false;
             description "A container defining statistics attributes.";
             leaf discontinuity-time {
               type yang:date-and-time;
               description
                 "The time on the most recent occasion at which any one
                  or more of the statistic counters suffered a
                  discontinuity. If no such discontinuities have
                  occurred since the last re-initialization of the local
                  management subsystem, then this node contains the time
                  the local management subsystem re-initialized
                  itself.";
             }
             container error {
               description "Containing error statistics.";
               uses statistics-sent-received {
                 description
                   "Statistic counters on the PIM messages per PIM
                    message Type. Each leaf attribute counts the number
                    of PIM messages that were of a particular Type (such
                    as Hello) and contained errors preventing them from
                    being processed by PIM.

                    Such messages are also counted by the corresponding
                    counter of the same Type (such as Hello) in the
                    'received' container.";
               }
               leaf checksum {
                 type yang:counter32;
                 description
                   "The number of PIM messages that were passed to PIM
                    and contained checksum errors.";
               }
               leaf format {
                 type yang:counter32;
                 description
                   "The number of PIM messages that passed checksum
                    validation but contained format errors, including
                    the errors such as PIM Version, Type, and message
                    length.";
               }
             }
             container queue {
               description "Containing queue statistics.";



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 47]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


               leaf size {
                 type uint32;
                 description
                   "The size of the input queue.";
               }
               leaf overflow {
                 type yang:counter32;
                 description
                   "The number of the input queue overflows.";
               }
             }
             container received {
               description
                 "Containing statistics of received messages.";
               uses statistics-sent-received;
             }
             container sent {
               description
                 "Containing statistics of sent messages.";
               uses statistics-sent-received;
             }
           }

           container topology-tree-info {
             config false;
             description "Containing topology tree information.";
             list ipv4-route {
               when "../../address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
                 description
                   "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
               }
               key "group source-address is-rpt";
               description "A list of IPv4 routes.";
               leaf group {
                 type rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address;
                 description "Group address.";
               }
               leaf source-address {
                 type rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address;
                 description "Source address.";
               }
               leaf is-rpt {
                 type boolean;
                 description
                   "'true' if the tree is RPT (Rendezvous-Point Tree).";
               }

               uses multicast-route-attributes;



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 48]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


             } // ipv4-route

             list ipv6-route {
               when "../../address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
                 description
                   "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
               }
               key "group source-address is-rpt";
               description "A list of IPv6 routes.";
               leaf group {
                 type rt-types:ipv6-multicast-group-address;
                 description "Group address.";
               }
               leaf source-address {
                 type rt-types:ipv6-multicast-source-address;
                 description "Source address.";
               }
               leaf is-rpt {
                 type boolean;
                 description
                   "'true' if the tree is RPT (Rendezvous-Point Tree).";
               }

               uses multicast-route-attributes;
             } // ipv6-route
           } // topology-tree-info
         } // address-family

         container interfaces {
           description
             "Containing a list of interfaces.";
           list interface {
             key "name";
             description
               "List of pim interfaces.";
             leaf name {
               type if:interface-ref;
               description
                 "Reference to an entry in the global interface
                 list.";
             }
             list address-family {
               key "address-family";
               description
                 "Each list entry for one address family.";
               uses rt:address-family;

               container bfd {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 49]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                 if-feature bfd;
                 description
                   "BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection)
                    operation.";
                 uses bfd-types:client-cfg-parms;
               }
               leaf dr-priority {
                 if-feature intf-dr-priority;
                 type uint32;
                 default 1;
                 description
                   "DR (Designated Router) priority as the preference in
                    the DR election process.";
               }
               leaf hello-interval {
                 if-feature intf-hello-interval;
                 type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
                 default 30;
                 description
                   "Periodic interval for Hello messages.
                    If 'infinity' or 'not-set' is used, no periodic
                    Hello messages are sent.";
                 reference
                   "RFC3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
                    (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised).
                    Sec. 4.8.
                    RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse
                    Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised).
                    Sec. 4.11.";
               }
               choice hello-holdtime-or-multiplier {
                 description
                   "Holdtime is timer value to time out the neighbor
                    state when the timer expires.
                    The holdtime value can be specified either by the
                    given holdtime value or by the calculation of the
                    hello-interval multiplied by the given value of the
                    multiplier.";
                 case holdtime {
                   if-feature intf-hello-holdtime;
                   leaf hello-holdtime {
                     type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
                     default 105;
                     description
                       "Hello holdtime is the amount of time to keep
                        the neighbor reachable until a new Hello message
                        is received.";
                   }



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 50]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                 }
                 case multiplier {
                   if-feature intf-hello-multiplier;
                   leaf hello-multiplier {
                     type rt-types:timer-multiplier;
                     default 3;
                     description
                       "Hello multiplier is the number by which the
                        hello interval is multplied to obtain the Hello
                        holdtime.
                        The value of the Hello holdtime is calculated
                        as:
                        hello-holdtime =
                        (multiplier + 0.5) * (hello-interval)";
                   }
                 }
               }
               leaf jp-interval {
                 if-feature intf-jp-interval;
                 type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
                 default 60;
                 description
                   "Periodic interval between Join/Prune messages.
                    If 'infinity' or 'not-set' is used, no periodic
                    Join/Prune messages are sent.";
               }
               choice jp-holdtime-or-multiplier {
                 description
                   "Join/Prune holdtime is the amount of time a receiver
                    must keep the Join/Prune state alive.
                    The holdtime value can be specified either by the
                    given holdtime value or by the calculation of the
                    jp-interval multiplied by the given value of the
                    multiplier.";
                 case holdtime {
                   if-feature intf-jp-holdtime;
                   leaf jp-holdtime {
                     type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
                     default 210;
                     description
                       "Join/Prune holdtime is the amount of time a
                        receiver must keep the Join/Prune state alive.";
                   }
                 }
                 case multiplier {
                   if-feature intf-jp-multiplier;
                   leaf jp-multiplier {
                     type rt-types:timer-multiplier;



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 51]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                     default 3;
                     description
                       "Join prune multiplier is the number by which the
                        join prune interval is multplied to obtain the
                        Join/Prune holdtime.
                        The value of the Join/Prune holdtime is
                        calculated as:
                        jp-holdtime =
                        (multiplier + 0.5) * (jp-interval)";
                   }
                 }
               }
               leaf override-interval {
                 if-feature intf-override-interval;
                 type uint16;
                 units milliseconds;
                 default 2500;
                 description
                   "A short period after a Join or Prune to allow other
                    routers on the LAN to override the Join or Prune.";
               }
               leaf propagation-delay {
                 if-feature intf-propagation-delay;
                 type uint16;
                 units milliseconds;
                 default 500;
                 description
                   "Expected propagation delay over the local link.";
               }

               // Interface state attributes
               leaf oper-status {
                 type enumeration {
                   enum up {
                     description
                     "The interface is ready to pass PIM messages.";
                   }
                   enum down {
                     description
                     "The interface does not pass PIM messages.";
                   }
                 }
                 config false;
                 description
                   "PIM operational status on the interface.
                    This status is PIM specific and separate from the
                    operational status of the underlying interface.";
               }



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 52]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


               leaf gen-id {
                 type uint32;
                 config false;
                 description
                   "The value of the Generation ID this router uses to
                    insert in the PIM Hello message sent on this
                    interface.";
               }
               leaf hello-expiration {
                 type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
                 config false;
                 description "Hello interval expiration time.";
               }
               container ipv4 {
                 when "../address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
                   description
                     "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
                 }
                 config false;
                 description "Interface state attributes for IPv4.";
                 leaf-list address {
                   type inet:ipv4-address;
                   description
                     "List of addresses on which PIM is operating.";
                 }
                 leaf dr-address {
                   type inet:ipv4-address;
                   description "DR (Designated Router) address.";
                 }
               }
               container ipv6 {
                 when "../address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
                   description
                     "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
                 }
                 config false;
                 description "Interface state attributes for IPv6.";
                 leaf-list address {
                   type inet:ipv6-address;
                   description
                     "List of addresses on which PIM is operating.";
                 }
                 leaf dr-address {
                   type inet:ipv6-address;
                   description "DR (Designated Router) address.";
                 }
               }
               container neighbors {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 53]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                 config false;
                 description
                   "Information learned from neighbors through this
                    interface.";
                 list ipv4-neighbor {
                   when "../../address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
                     description
                       "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
                   }
                   key "address";
                   description "Neighbor state information.";
                   leaf address {
                     type inet:ipv4-address;
                     description "Neighbor address.";
                   }
                   uses neighbor-state-af-attributes;
                 } // list ipv4-neighbor
                 list ipv6-neighbor {
                   when "../../address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
                     description
                       "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
                   }
                   key "address";
                   description "Neighbor state information.";
                   leaf address {
                     type inet:ipv6-address;
                     description "Neighbor address.";
                   }
                   uses neighbor-state-af-attributes;
                 } // list ipv6-neighbor
               } // neighbors
             } // address-family
           } // interface
         } // interfaces
       } // pim
     } // augment

     /*
      * Notifications
      */
     notification pim-neighbor-event {
       description "Notification event for neighbor.";
       leaf event-type {
         type neighbor-event-type;
         description "Event type.";
       }
       uses pim-interface-state-ref;
       leaf interface-af-ref {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 54]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


         type leafref {
           path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
             + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface"
             + "[pim-base:name = current()/../interface-ref]/"
             + "pim-base:address-family/pim-base:address-family";
         }
         description
           "Reference to a PIM interface address family.";
       }
       leaf neighbor-ipv4-ref {
         when "../interface-af-ref = 'rt:ipv4'" {
           description "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
         }
         type leafref {
           path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
             + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface"
             + "[pim-base:name = current()/../interface-ref]/"
             + "pim-base:address-family"
             + "[pim-base:address-family = "
             + "current()/../interface-af-ref]/"
             + "pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv4-neighbor/"
             + "pim-base:address";
         }
         description
           "Reference to a PIM IPv4 neighbor.";
       }
       leaf neighbor-ipv6-ref {
         when "../interface-af-ref = 'rt:ipv6'" {
           description "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
         }
         type leafref {
           path "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
             + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface"
             + "[pim-base:name = current()/../interface-ref]/"
             + "pim-base:address-family"
             + "[pim-base:address-family = "
             + "current()/../interface-af-ref]/"
             + "pim-base:neighbors/pim-base:ipv6-neighbor/"
             + "pim-base:address";
         }
         description
           "Reference to a PIM IPv6 neighbor.";
       }
       leaf up-time {
         type rt-types:timeticks64;
         description
           "The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
            the neighbor relationship has been formed as reachable



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 55]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


            without beeing timed out.";
       }
     }
     notification pim-interface-event {
       description "Notification event for interface.";
       leaf event-type {
         type interface-event-type;
         description "Event type.";
       }
       uses pim-interface-state-ref;
       container ipv4 {
         description "Containing IPv4 information.";
         leaf-list address {
           type inet:ipv4-address;
           description "List of addresses.";
         }
         leaf dr-address {
           type inet:ipv4-address;
           description "DR (Designated Router) address.";
         }
       }
       container ipv6 {
         description "Containing IPv6 information.";
         leaf-list address {
           type inet:ipv6-address;
           description "List of addresses.";
         }
         leaf dr-address {
           type inet:ipv6-address;
           description "DR (Designated Router) address.";
         }
       }
     }
   }
   <CODE ENDS>



6.2.  PIM RP module


   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-rp@2018-01-29.yang"
   module ietf-pim-rp {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-rp";
     prefix pim-rp;

     import ietf-inet-types {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 56]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


       prefix "inet";
     }

     import ietf-routing-types {
       prefix "rt-types";
     }

     import ietf-interfaces {
       prefix "if";
     }

     import ietf-routing {
       prefix "rt";
     }

     import ietf-pim-base {
       prefix "pim-base";
     }

     organization
       "IETF PIM Working Group";

     contact
       "WG Web:   <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
        WG List:  <mailto:pim@ietf.org>

        Editor:   Xufeng Liu
                  <mailto:Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>

        Editor:   Pete McAllister
                  <mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>

        Editor:   Anish Peter
                  <mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>

        Editor:   Mahesh Sivakumar
                  <mailto:masivaku@cisco.com>

        Editor:   Yisong Liu
                  <mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>

        Editor:   Fangwei Hu
                  <mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";

     description
       "The YANG module defines a PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast)
        RP (Rendezvous Point) model.";




Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 57]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     revision 2018-01-29 {
       description
         "Initial revision.";
       reference
         "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM";
     }

     /*
      * Features
      */
     feature bsr {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the system supports BSR
          (Bootstrap Router).";
       reference
         "RFC5059: Bootstrap Router (BSR) Mechanism for Protocol
          Independent Multicast (PIM).";
     }

     feature bsr-election-state {
       if-feature bsr;
       description
         "This feature indicates that the system supports providing
          BSR election state.";
       reference
         "RFC5059: Bootstrap Router (BSR) Mechanism for Protocol
          Independent Multicast (PIM).";
     }

     feature static-rp-override {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the system supports configuration
          of static RP (Rendezvous Point) override.";
       reference
         "RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 3.7.";
     }

     feature candidate-interface {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the system supports using
          an interface to configure a BSR or RP candidate.";
     }

     feature candidate-ipv4 {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the system supports using
          an IPv4 address to configure a BSR or RP candidate.";



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 58]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     }

     feature candidate-ipv6 {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the system supports using
          an IPv6 address to configure a BSR or RP candidate.";
     }


     /*
      * Typedefs
      */
     typedef rp-event-type {
       type enumeration {
         enum invalid-jp {
           description
             "An invalid JP (Join/Prune) message has been received.";
         }
         enum invalid-register {
           description
             "An invalid register message has been received.";
         }
         enum mapping-created {
           description
             "A new mapping has been created.";
         }
         enum mapping-deleted {
           description
             "A mapping has been deleted.";
         }
       }
       description "Operational status event type for notifications.";
     }

     /*
      * Identities
      */
     identity rp-mode {
       description
         "The mode of an RP, which can be SM (Sparse Mode) or
          BIDIR (bi-directional).";
     }

     identity rp-info-source-type {
       description
         "The information source of an RP.";
     }
     identity static {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 59]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


       base rp-info-source-type;
       description
         "The RP is statically configured.";
     }
     identity bootstrap {
       base rp-info-source-type;
       description
         "The RP is learned from bootstrap.";
     }

     /*
      * Groupings
      */
     grouping rp-mapping-state-attributes {
       description
         "Grouping of RP mapping attributes.";
       leaf up-time {
         type rt-types:timeticks64;
         description
           "The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
            the RP mapping or the RP became actively available.";
       }
       leaf expiration {
         type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
         description "Expiration time.";
       }
     } // rp-mapping-state-attributes

     grouping rp-state-attributes {
       description
         "Grouping of RP state attributes.";
       leaf info-source-type {
         type identityref {
           base rp-info-source-type;
         }
         description "The information source of an RP.";
       } // info-source-type
       leaf up-time {
         type rt-types:timeticks64;
         description
             "The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since
              the RP became actively available.";
       }
       leaf expiration {
         type rt-types:timer-value-seconds16;
         description "Expiration time.";
       }
     } // rp-state-attributes



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 60]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     grouping static-rp-attributes {
       description
         "Grouping of static RP attributes, used in augmenting
          modules.";
       leaf policy-name {
         type string;
         description
           "The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
            policy that contains one or more policy rules used to
            determine which multicast group addresses are mapped
            to this statically configured RP address.
            If a policy is not specified, the entire multicast address
            space is mapped.
            The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
            of this document.";
       }
       leaf override {
         if-feature static-rp-override;
         type boolean;
         default false;
         description
           "When there is a conflict between static RP and dynamic
            RP, setting this attribute to 'true' will ask the
            system to use static RP.";
       }
     } // static-rp-attributes

     grouping rp-candidate-attributes {
       description
         "Grouping of RP candidate attributes.";
       leaf policy-name {
         type string;
         description
           "The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
            policy that contains one or more policy rules used to
            accept or reject certain multicast groups.
            If a policy is not specified, the entire multicast address
            space is accepted.
            The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
            of this document.";
       }
       leaf mode {
         type identityref {
           base rp-mode;
         }
         description
           "The mode of an RP, which can be SM (Sparse Mode) or BIDIR
            (bi-directional), each of them is defined in a saparate YNAG



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 61]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


            module. If a system supports an RP mode, the corresponding
            YANG module is implemented.
            When the value of this leaf is not specified, the default
            value is the supported mode if only one mode is implemented,
            or the default value is SM (Sparce Mode) if both SM and
            BIDIR are implemented.";
       }
     } // rp-candidate-attributes

     /*
      * Configuration data nodes
      */

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"
       + "pim-base:address-family" {
       description "PIM RP augmentation.";

       container rp {
         description
           "PIM RP configuration data.";

         container static-rp {
           description
             "Containing static RP attributes.";
           list ipv4-rp {
             when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
               description
                 "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
             }
             key "rp-address";
             description
               "A list of IPv4 RP addresses.";
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ipv4-address;
               description
                 "Specifies a static RP address.";
             }
           }

           list ipv6-rp {
             when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
               description
                 "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
             }
             key "rp-address";
             description
               "A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
             leaf rp-address {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 62]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


               type inet:ipv6-address;
               description
                 "Specifies a static RP address.";
             }
           }
         } // static-rp

         container bsr {
           if-feature bsr;
           description
             "Containing BSR (BootStrap Router) attributes.";
           container bsr-candidate {
             presence
               "Present to serve as a BSR candidate";
             description
               "BSR candidate attributes.";

             choice interface-or-address {
               description
                 "Use either interface or ip-address.";
               case interface {
                 if-feature candidate-interface;
                 leaf interface {
                   type if:interface-ref;
                   mandatory true;
                   description
                     "Interface to be used by BSR.";
                 }
               }
               case ipv4-address {
                 when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
                   description
                     "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
                 }
                 if-feature candidate-ipv4;
                 leaf ipv4-address {
                   type inet:ipv4-address;
                   mandatory true;
                   description
                     "IP address to be used by BSR.";
                 }
               }
               case ipv6-address {
                 when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
                   description
                     "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
                 }
                 if-feature candidate-ipv6;



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 63]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                 leaf ipv6-address {
                   type inet:ipv6-address;
                   mandatory true;
                   description
                     "IP address to be used by BSR.";
                 }
               }
             }

             leaf hash-mask-length{
               type uint8 {
                 range "0..128";
               }
               mandatory true;
               description
                 "Value contained in BSR messages used by all routers to
                  hash (map) to an RP.";
             }

             leaf priority {
               type uint8 {
                 range "0..255";
               }
               default 64;
               description
                 "BSR election priority among different candidate BSRs.
                  A larger value has a higher priority over a smaller
                  value.";
             }
           } // bsr-candidate

           container rp-candidate {
             description
               "Containing RP candidate attributes.";
             list interface {
               if-feature candidate-interface;
               key "name";
               description
                 "A list of RP candidates";
               leaf name {
                 type if:interface-ref;
                 description
                   "Interface that the RP candidate uses.";
               }
               uses rp-candidate-attributes;
             }

             list ipv4-address {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 64]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


               when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
                 description
                   "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
               }
               if-feature candidate-ipv4;
               key "address";
               description
                 "A list of RP candidate addresses.";
               leaf address {
                 type inet:ipv4-address;
                 description
                   "IPv4 address that the RP candidate uses.";
               }
               uses rp-candidate-attributes;
             }

             list ipv6-address {
               when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
                 description
                   "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
               }
               if-feature candidate-ipv6;
               key "address";
               description
                 "A list of RP candidate addresses.";
               leaf address {
                 type inet:ipv6-address;
                 description
                   "IPv6 address that the RP candidate uses.";
               }
               uses rp-candidate-attributes;
             }
           }

           // BSR state attributes.
           container bsr {
             config false;
             description
               "BSR information.";
             leaf address {
               type inet:ip-address;
               description "BSR address";
             }
             leaf hash-mask-length {
               type uint8 {
                 range "0..128";
               }
               description "Hash mask length.";



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 65]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


             }
             leaf priority {
               type uint8 {
                 range "0..255";
               }
               description "Priority.";
             }
             leaf up-time {
               type rt-types:timeticks64;
               description
                 "The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second)
                  since the BSR became up.";
             }
           }
           choice election-state {
             if-feature bsr-election-state;
             config false;
             description "BSR election state.";
             case candidate {
               leaf candidate-bsr-state {
                 type enumeration {
                   enum "candidate" {
                     description
                       "The router is a candidate to be the BSR for the
                        scope zone, but currently another router is the
                        preferred BSR.";
                   }
                   enum "pending" {
                     description
                       "The router is a candidate to be the BSR for the
                        scope zone. Currently, no other router is the
                        preferred BSR, but this router is not yet the
                        elected BSR.  This is a temporary state that
                        prevents rapid thrashing of the choice of BSR
                        during BSR election.";
                   }
                   enum "elected" {
                     description
                       "The router is the elected BSR for the scope zone
                        and it must perform all the BSR functions.";
                   }
                 }
                 description
                   "Candidate-BSR state.";
                 reference
                   "RFC5059, Section 3.1.1.";
               }
             }



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 66]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


             case "non-candidate" {
               leaf non-candidate-bsr-state {
                 type enumeration {
                   enum "no-info" {
                     description
                       "The router has no information about this scope
                        zone.";
                   }
                   enum "accept-any" {
                     description
                       "The router does not know of an active BSR, and
                        will accept the first Bootstrap message it sees
                        as giving the new BSR's identity and the
                        RP-Set.";
                   }
                   enum "accept" {
                     description
                       "The router knows the identity of the current
                        BSR, and is using the RP-Set provided by that
                        BSR. Only Bootstrap messages from that BSR or
                        from a Candidate-BSR (C-BSR) with higher weight
                        than the current BSR will be accepted.";
                   }
                 }
                 description
                   "Non-candidate-BSR state.";
                 reference
                   "RFC5059, Section 3.1.2.";
               }
             }
           } // election-state
           leaf bsr-next-bootstrap {
             type uint16;
             units seconds;
             config false;
             description
               "The remaining time interval in seconds until the next
                bootstrap will be sent.";
           }

           container rp {
             config false;
             description
               "State information of the RP.";
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ip-address;
               description "RP address.";
             }



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 67]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


             leaf policy-name {
               type string;
               description
                 "The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
                  policy that contains one or more policy rules used to
                  accept or reject certain multicast groups.
                  If a policy is not specified, the entire multicast
                  address space is accepted.
                  The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
                  of this document.";
             }
             leaf up-time {
               type rt-types:timeticks64;
               description
                 "The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second)
                  since the RP became actively available.";
             }
           }
           leaf rp-candidate-next-advertisement {
             type uint16;
             units seconds;
             config false;
             description
               "The remaining time interval in seconds until the next
                RP candidate advertisement will be sent.";
           }
         } // bsr

         container rp-list {
           config false;
           description
             "Containing a list of RPs.";
           list ipv4-rp {
             when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
               description
                 "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
             }
             key "rp-address mode";
             description
               "A list of IPv4 RP addresses.";
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ipv4-address;
               description
                 "RP address.";
             }
             leaf mode {
               type identityref {
                 base rp-mode;



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 68]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


               }
               description
                 "RP mode.";
             }
             leaf info-source-address {
               type inet:ipv4-address;
               description
                 "The address where RP information is learned.";
             }
             uses rp-state-attributes;
           }

           list ipv6-rp {
             when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
               description
                 "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
             }
             key "rp-address mode";
             description
               "A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ipv6-address;
               description
                 "RP address.";
             }
             leaf mode {
               type identityref {
                 base rp-mode;
               }
               description
                 "RP mode.";
             }
             leaf info-source-address {
               type inet:ipv6-address;
               description
                 "The address where RP information is learned.";
             }
             uses rp-state-attributes;
           }
         } // rp-list

         container rp-mappings {
           config false;
           description
             "Containing a list of group-to-RP mappings.";
           list ipv4-rp {
             when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
               description



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 69]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                 "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
             }
             key "group rp-address";
             description
               "A list of group-to-RP mappings.";
             leaf group {
               type inet:ipv4-prefix;
               description
                 "Group prefix.";
             }
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ipv4-address;
               description
                 "RP address.";
             }
             uses rp-mapping-state-attributes;
           }

           list ipv6-rp {
             when "../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
               description
                 "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
             }
             key "group rp-address";
             description
               "A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
             leaf group {
               type inet:ipv6-prefix;
               description
                 "Group prefix.";
             }
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ipv6-address;
               description
                 "RP address.";
             }
             uses rp-mapping-state-attributes;
           }
         } // rp-mappings
       } // rp
     } // augment

     /*
      * Notifications
      */
     notification pim-rp-event {
       description "Notification event for RP.";
       leaf event-type {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 70]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


         type rp-event-type;
         description "Event type.";
       }
       uses pim-base:pim-instance-af-state-ref;
       leaf group {
         type rt-types:ip-multicast-group-address;
         description "Group address.";
       }
       leaf rp-address {
         type inet:ip-address;
         description "RP address.";
       }
       leaf is-rpt {
         type boolean;
         description "'true' if the tree is RPT (RP-Tree).";
       }
       leaf mode {
         type pim-base:pim-mode;
         description "PIM mode.";
       }
       leaf message-origin {
         type inet:ip-address;
         description "Where the message is originated.";
       }
     }
   }
   <CODE ENDS>



6.3.  PIM-SM module


   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-sm@2018-01-29.yang"
   module ietf-pim-sm {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-sm";
     prefix pim-sm;

     import ietf-inet-types {
       prefix "inet";
     }

     import ietf-routing {
       prefix "rt";
     }

     import ietf-pim-base {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 71]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


       prefix "pim-base";
     }

     import ietf-pim-rp {
       prefix "pim-rp";
     }

     organization
       "IETF PIM Working Group";

     contact
       "WG Web:   <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
        WG List:  <mailto:pim@ietf.org>

        Editor:   Xufeng Liu
                  <mailto:Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>

        Editor:   Pete McAllister
                  <mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>

        Editor:   Anish Peter
                  <mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>

        Editor:   Mahesh Sivakumar
                  <mailto:masivaku@cisco.com>

        Editor:   Yisong Liu
                  <mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>

        Editor:   Fangwei Hu
                  <mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";

     description
       "The YANG module defines a PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast)
        SM (Sparse Mode) model.";

     revision 2018-01-29 {
       description
         "Initial revision.";
       reference
         "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM.
          RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.2.";
     }

     /*
      * Features
      */



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 72]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     feature spt-switch-infinity {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the system supports configuration
          choice whether to trigger the switchover from the RPT
          (Rendezvous Point Tree) to the SPT (Shortest Path Tree).";
       reference
         "RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.2.";
     }

     feature spt-switch-policy {
       description
         "This feature indicates that the system supports configuring
          policy for the switchover from the RPT to the SPT.";
       reference
         "RFC7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
          (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised). Sec. 4.2.";
     }

     /*
      * Identities
      */
     identity sm {
       base pim-rp:rp-mode;
       description
         "SM (Sparse Mode).";
     }

     /*
      * Groupings
      */
     grouping static-rp-sm-container {
       description
         "Grouping that contains SM attributes for static RP.";
       container sm {
         presence
           "Indicate the support of sparse mode.";
         description
           "PIM SM configuration data.";

         uses pim-rp:static-rp-attributes;
       } // sm
     } // static-rp-sm-container

     /*
      * Configuration data nodes
      */
     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 73]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


       + "pim-base:address-family" {
       description "PIM SM augmentation.";

       container sm {
         description
           "PIM SM configuration data.";

         container asm {
           description
             "ASM (Any Source Multicast) attributes.";

           container anycast-rp {
             presence
               "Present to enable anycast RP (Rendezvous Point).";
             description
               "Anycast RP attributes.";

             list ipv4-anycast-rp {
               when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
                 description
                   "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
               }
               key "anycast-address rp-address";
               description
                 "A list of IPv4 anycast RP settings, only applicable
                  when pim-base:address-family is IPv4.";
               leaf anycast-address {
                 type inet:ipv4-address;
                 description
                   "IP address of the anycast RP set. This IP address
                    is used by the multicast groups or sources to join
                    or register.";
               }

               leaf rp-address {
                 type inet:ipv4-address;
                 description
                   "IP address of the router configured with anycast
                    RP. This is the IP address where the Register
                    messages are forwarded.";
               }
             }
             list ipv6-anycast-rp {
               when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
                 description
                   "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
               }
               key "anycast-address rp-address";



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 74]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


               description
                 "A list of IPv6 anycast RP settings, only applicable
                  when pim-base:address-family is IPv6.";
               leaf anycast-address {
                 type inet:ipv6-address;
                 description
                   "IP address of the anycast RP set. This IP address
                    is used by the multicast groups or sources to join
                    or register.";
               }

               leaf rp-address {
                 type inet:ipv6-address;
                 description
                   "IP address of the router configured with anycast
                    RP. This is the IP address where the Register
                    messages are forwarded.";
               }
             }
           }

           container spt-switch {
             description
               "SPT (Shortest Path Tree) switching attributes.";
             container infinity {
               if-feature spt-switch-infinity;
               presence
                 "Present if SPT switchover threshold is set to
                  infinity, according to the policy specified below.";
               description
                 "The receiver's DR (Designated Router) never triggers
                  the switchover from the RPT to the SPT.";
               leaf policy-name {
                 if-feature spt-switch-policy;
                 type string;
                 description
                   "The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
                    policy that contains one or more policy rules used
                    to accept or reject certain multicast groups.
                    The groups accepted by this policy have the SPT
                    switchover threshold set to infinity, meaning that
                    they will stay on the shared tree forever.
                    If a policy is not specified, the entire multicast
                    address space is accepted.
                    The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
                    of this document.";
               }
             } // infinity



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 75]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


           }
         } // asm

         container ssm {
           presence
             "Present to enable SSM (Source-Specific Multicast).";
           description
             "SSM (Source-Specific Multicast) attributes.";

           leaf range-policy {
             type string;
             description
               "The string value is the name to uniquely identify a
                policy that contains one or more policy rules used
                to accept or reject certain multicast groups.
                The groups accepted by this policy define the multicast
                group rang used by SSM.
                If a policy is not specified, the default SSM multicast
                group rang is used.
                The default SSM multicast group range is 232.0.0.0/8 for
                IPv4 and ff3x::/96 for IPv6 where x reprents any valid
                scope identifier.
                The definition of such a policy is outside the scope
                of this document.";
             reference
               "RFC4607: Source-Specific Multicast for IP.";
           }
         } // ssm
       } // sm
     } // augment

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"
       + "pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
       + "pim-base:address-family" {
       description "PIM SM augmentation.";

       container sm {
         presence "Present to enable sparse-mode.";
         description
           "PIM SM configuration data.";

         leaf passive {
           type empty;
           description
             "Specifies that no PIM messages are sent or accepted on
              this PIM interface, but the interface can be included in a
              multicast forwarding entry.";
         }



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 76]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


       } // sm
     } // augment

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"
       + "pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/"
       + "pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp" {
       description "PIM SM augmentation.";

       uses static-rp-sm-container;
     } // augment

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim/"
       + "pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/"
       + "pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp" {
       description "PIM SM augmentation.";

       uses static-rp-sm-container;
     } // augment
   }
   <CODE ENDS>



6.4.  PIM-DM module


   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-dm@2018-01-29.yang"
   module ietf-pim-dm {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-dm";
     prefix pim-dm;

     import ietf-routing {
       prefix "rt";
     }

     import ietf-pim-base {
       prefix "pim-base";
     }

     organization
       "IETF PIM Working Group";

     contact
       "WG Web:   <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
        WG List:  <mailto:pim@ietf.org>

        Editor:   Xufeng Liu



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 77]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                  <mailto:Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>

        Editor:   Pete McAllister
                  <mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>

        Editor:   Anish Peter
                  <mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>

        Editor:   Mahesh Sivakumar
                  <mailto:masivaku@cisco.com>

        Editor:   Yisong Liu
                  <mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>

        Editor:   Fangwei Hu
                  <mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";

     description
       "The YANG module defines a PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast)
        DM (Dense Mode) model.";

     revision 2018-01-29 {
       description
         "Initial revision.";
       reference
         "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM.
          RFC 3973: Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode
         (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised).";
     }

     /*
      * Configuration data nodes
      */

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
       + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family" {
       description "PIM DM (Dense Mode) augmentation.";

       container dm {
         presence "Present to enable dense-mode.";
         description
           "PIM DM configuration data.";
       } // Dm
     } // augment

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
       + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
       + "pim-base:address-family" {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 78]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


       description "PIM DM augmentation to PIM base interface.";

       container dm {
         presence "Present to enable dense-mode.";
         description
           "PIM DM configuration data.";
       } // sm
     } // augment
   }
   <CODE ENDS>



6.5.  PIM-BIDIR module


   <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-pim-bidir@2018-01-29.yang"
   module ietf-pim-bidir {
     yang-version 1.1;
     namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-bidir";
     prefix pim-bidir;

     import ietf-inet-types {
       prefix "inet";
     }

     import ietf-routing-types {
       prefix "rt-types";
     }

     import ietf-interfaces {
       prefix "if";
     }

     import ietf-routing {
       prefix "rt";
     }

     import ietf-pim-base {
       prefix "pim-base";
     }

     import ietf-pim-rp {
       prefix "pim-rp";
     }

     organization
       "IETF PIM Working Group";



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 79]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     contact
       "WG Web:   <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
        WG List:  <mailto:pim@ietf.org>

        Editor:   Xufeng Liu
                  <mailto:Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com>

        Editor:   Pete McAllister
                  <mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>

        Editor:   Anish Peter
                  <mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>

        Editor:   Mahesh Sivakumar
                  <mailto:masivaku@cisco.com>

        Editor:   Yisong Liu
                  <mailto:liuyisong@huawei.com>

        Editor:   Fangwei Hu
                  <mailto:hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>";

     description
       "The YANG module defines a PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast)
        BIDIR (Bidirectional) mode model.";

     revision 2018-01-29 {
       description
         "Initial revision.";
       reference
         "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for PIM.
          RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
          (BIDIR-PIM).";

     }

     /*
      * Features
      */
     feature intf-df-election {
       description
         "Support configuration of interface DF election.";
       reference
         "RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
          (BIDIR-PIM). Sec. 3.5.";
     }

     /*



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 80]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


      * Identities
      */
     identity bidir {
       base pim-rp:rp-mode;
       description
         "BIDIR (Bidirectional) mode.";
     }

     identity df-state {
       description
         "DF (Designated Forwarder) election state type.";
       reference
         "RFC5015: Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast
          (BIDIR-PIM).";
     }

     identity df-state-offer {
       base df-state;
       description
         "Initial election state. When in the Offer state, a router
          thinks it can eventually become the winner and periodically
          generates Offer messages.";
     }

     identity df-state-lose {
       base df-state;
       description
         "There either is a different election winner or that no
          router on the link has a path to the RPA (Rendezvous-Point
          Address).";
     }

     identity df-state-win {
       base df-state;
       description
         "The router is the acting DF without any contest.";
     }

     identity df-state-backoff {
       base df-state;
       description
         "The router is the acting DF but another router has made a
          bid to take over.";
     }

     /*
      * Groupings
      */



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 81]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


     grouping static-rp-bidir-container {
       description
         "Grouping that contains BIDIR (Bidirectional) attributes for
          static RP (Rendezvous-Point).";
       container bidir {
         presence
           "Indicate the support of BIDIR mode.";
         description
           "PIM BIDIR configuration data.";

         uses pim-rp:static-rp-attributes;
       } // bidir
     } // static-rp-bidir-container

     grouping interface-df-election-state-attributes {
       description
         "Grouping that contains the state attributes of a DF election
          on an interface.";
       leaf interface-state {
         type identityref {
           base df-state;
         }
         description
           "Interface state with respect to the DF election.";
       }
       leaf up-time {
         type rt-types:timeticks64;
         description
           "The number of time ticks (hundredths of a second) since the
            current DF has been elected as the winner.";
       }
       leaf winner-metric {
         type uint32;
         description
           "The unicast routing metric used by the DF to reach the RP.
            The value is announced by the DF.";
       }
       leaf winner-metric-preference {
         type uint32;
         description
           "The preference value assigned to the unicast routing
            protocol that the DF used to obtain the route to the RP.
            The value is announced by the DF.";
       }
     } // interface-df-election-state-attributes

     /*
      * Configuration data and operational state date nodes



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 82]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


      */

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
       + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family" {
       description "PIM BIDIR (Bidirectional) augmentation.";

       container bidir {
         presence "Present to enable BIDIR mode.";
         description
           "PIM BIDIR configuration data.";
       } // bidir
     } // augment

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
       + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
       + "pim-base:address-family" {
       description "PIM BIDIR augmentation.";

       container bidir {
         presence "Present to enable BIDIR mode.";
         description
           "PIM BIDIR configuration data.";
         container df-election {
           if-feature intf-df-election;
           description
             "DF election attributes.";
           leaf offer-interval {
             type uint16;
             units milliseconds;
             default 100;
             description
               "Offer interval specifies the interval between repeated
                DF election messages.";
           }
           leaf backoff-interval {
             type uint16;
             units milliseconds;
             default 1000;
             description
               "This is the interval that the acting DF waits between
                receiving a better DF Offer and sending the Pass message
                to transfer DF responsibility";
           }
           leaf offer-multiplier {
             type uint8;
             default 3;
             description
               "This is number of transmission attempts for DF election



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 83]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                messages.
                When a DF election Offer or Winner message fails to be
                received, the message is retransmitted.
                The offer-multiplier sets the minimum number of DF
                election messages that must fail to be received for DF
                election to fail.
                If a router receives from a neighbor a better offer than
                its own, the router stops participating in the election
                for a period of offer-multiplier * offer-interval.
                Eventually, all routers except the best candidate stop
                sending Offer messages.";
           }
         } // df-election
       } // bidir
     } // augment

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
       + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/"
       + "pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv4-rp" {
       description "PIM BIDIR augmentation.";

       uses static-rp-bidir-container;
     } // augment

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
       + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp/"
       + "pim-rp:static-rp/pim-rp:ipv6-rp" {
       description "PIM BIDIR augmentation.";

       uses static-rp-bidir-container;
     } // augment

     /*
      * Operational state data nodes
      */

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
       + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:rp" {
       description "PIM BIDIR augmentation to RP state data.";

       container bidir {
         config false;
         description
           "PIM BIDIR state data.";
         container df-election {
           description
             "DF election data.";
           list ipv4-rp {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 84]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


             when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
               description
                 "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
             }
             key "rp-address";
             description
               "A list of IPv4 RP addresses.";
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ipv4-address;
               description
                 "The address of the RP.";
             }
           } // ipv4-rp
           list ipv6-rp {
             when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
               description
                 "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
             }
             key "rp-address";
             description
               "A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ipv6-address;
               description
                 "The address of the RP.";
             }
           } // ipv6-rp
         } // df-election

         container interface-df-election {
           description
             "Interface DF election data.";
           list ipv4-rp {
             when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv4'" {
               description
                 "Only applicable to IPv4 address family.";
             }
             key "rp-address interface-name";
             description
               "A list of IPv4 RP addresses.";
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ipv4-address;
               description
                 "The address of the RP.";
             }
             leaf interface-name {
               type if:interface-ref;
               description



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 85]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                 "The name of the interface for which the DF state is
                  being maintained.";
             }
             leaf df-address {
               type inet:ipv4-address;
               description
                 "The address of the elected DF, which is the winner of
                  the DF Election process.";
             }
             uses interface-df-election-state-attributes;
           } // ipv4-rp
           list ipv6-rp {
             when "../../../../pim-base:address-family = 'rt:ipv6'" {
               description
                 "Only applicable to IPv6 address family.";
             }
             key "rp-address interface-name";
             description
               "A list of IPv6 RP addresses.";
             leaf rp-address {
               type inet:ipv6-address;
               description
                 "The address of the RP.";
             }
             leaf interface-name {
               type if:interface-ref;
               description
                 "The address of the RP.";
             }
             leaf df-address {
               type inet:ipv6-address;
               description
                 "DF address.";
             }
             uses interface-df-election-state-attributes;
           } // ipv6-rp
         } // interface-df-election
       }
     } // augment

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
       + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
       + "pim-base:address-family/pim-base:neighbors/"
       + "pim-base:ipv4-neighbor" {
       description
         "PIM BIDIR augmentation to the IPv4 neighbor state data.";
       leaf bidir-capable {
         type boolean;



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 86]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


         description
           "'true' if the neighbor is using the Bidirectional Capable
            option in the last Hello message.";
       }
     } // augment

     augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
       + "pim-base:pim/pim-base:interfaces/pim-base:interface/"
       + "pim-base:address-family/pim-base:neighbors/"
       + "pim-base:ipv6-neighbor" {
       description
         "PIM BIDIR augmentation to the IPv6 neighbor state data.";
       leaf bidir-capable {
         type boolean;
         description
           "'true' if the neighbor is using the Bidirectional Capable
            option in the last Hello message.";
       }
     } // augment
   }
   <CODE ENDS>



7.  Implementation Status

   This section to be removed by the RFC editor.

   This section records the status of known implementations of the
   protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
   Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in [RFC7942].
   The description of implementations in this section is intended to
   assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing drafts to
   RFCs.  Please note that the listing of any individual implementation
   here does not imply endorsement by the IETF.  Furthermore, no effort
   has been spent to verify the information presented here that was
   supplied by IETF contributors.  This is not intended as, and must not
   be construed to be, a catalog of available implementations or their
   features.  Readers are advised to note that other implementations may
   exist.

   According to RFC 7942, "this will allow reviewers and working groups
   to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of
   running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation
   and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature.
   It is up to the individual working groups to use this information as
   they see fit".




Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 87]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   This document is the work result of the PIM working group's YANG
   multicast design team.  The following wiki page contains the
   information on the design team members, the meeting discussions,
   lists of modeled features, and which features are supported by which
   existing implementations:

   https://trac.ietf.org/trac/pim/wiki/yang

8.  Security Considerations

   The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
   that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
   as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040].  The lowest NETCONF layer
   is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
   transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242].  The lowest RESTCONF layer
   is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
   [RFC5246].

   The NETCONF access control model [RFC6536] provides the means to
   restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a
   preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol
   operations and content.

   There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
   writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
   default).  These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
   in some network environments.  Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
   to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
   effect on network operations.  These are the subtrees and data nodes
   and their sensitivity/vulnerability:

   pim-base:graceful-restart
      This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM graceful
      restart at the global level on a device.  Modifying the
      configuration can cause temporary interruption to the multicast
      routing during restart.

   pim-base:address-family/pim-base:graceful-restart
      This subtree specifies the per address family configuration for
      the PIM graceful restart on a device.  Modifying the configuration
      can cause temporary interruption to the multicast routing during
      restart.

   pim-base:address-family/pim-rp:pim-rp:rp
      This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM Rendezvous
      Point (RP) on a device.  Modifying the configuration can cause RP
      malfunctions.




Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 88]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   pim-base:address-family/pim-sm:sm
      This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM Sparse Mode
      (PIM-SM) on a device.  Modifying the configuration can cause
      multicast traffic disabled or rerouted in PIM-SM.

   pim-base:address-family/pim-dm:dm
      This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM Dense Mode
      (PIM-DM) on a device.  Modifying the configuration can cause
      multicast traffic disabled or rerouted in PIM-DM.

   pim-base:address-family/pim-bidir:bidir
      This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM Bidirectional
      Mode (PIM-BIDIR) on a device.  Modifying the configuration can
      cause multicast traffic disabled or rerouted in PIM-BIDIR.

   pim-base:interfaces
      This subtree specifies the configuration for the PIM interfaces on
      a device.  Modifying the configuration can cause the PIM protocol
      to get insufficient or incorrect information.

   These subtrees are all nnder /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/
   pim-base:pim.

   Unauthorized access to any data node of these subtrees can adversely
   affect the multicast routing subsystem of both the local device and
   the network.  This may lead to network malfunctions, delivery of
   packets to inappropriate destinations, and other problems.

   Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
   sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments.  It is thus
   important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
   notification) to these data nodes.  These are the subtrees and data
   nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:

   /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/pim-base:pim

   Unauthorized access to any data node of the above subtree can
   disclose the operational state information of PIM on this device.

9.  IANA Considerations

   RFC Ed.: In this section, replace all occurrences of 'XXXX' with the
   actual RFC number (and remove this note).

   This document registers the following namespace URIs in the IETF XML
   registry [RFC3688]:





Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 89]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-base
   Registrant Contact: The IESG.
   XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-bidir
   Registrant Contact: The IESG.
   XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-dm
   Registrant Contact: The IESG.
   XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-rp
   Registrant Contact: The IESG.
   XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-sm
   Registrant Contact: The IESG.
   XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

   This document registers the following YANG modules in the YANG Module
   Names registry [RFC7950]:

   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   name:         ietf-pim-base
   namespace:    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-base
   prefix:       pim-base
   reference:    RFC XXXX
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   name:         ietf-pim-bidir
   namespace:    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-bidir
   prefix:       pim-bidir
   reference:    RFC XXXX
   --------------------------------------------------------------------





Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 90]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   name:         ietf-pim-dm
   namespace:    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-dm
   prefix:       pim-dm
   reference:    RFC XXXX
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   name:         ietf-pim-rp
   namespace:    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-rp
   prefix:       pim-rp
   reference:    RFC XXXX
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

   --------------------------------------------------------------------
   name:         ietf-pim-sm
   namespace:    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-pim-sm
   prefix:       pim-sm
   reference:    RFC XXXX
   --------------------------------------------------------------------

10.  Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to thank Steve Baillargeon, Guo Feng, Robert
   Kebler, Tanmoy Kundu, and Stig Venaas for their valuable
   contributions.

11.  References

11.1.  Normative References

   [RFC3569]  Bhattacharyya, S., Ed., "An Overview of Source-Specific
              Multicast (SSM)", RFC 3569, DOI 10.17487/RFC3569, July
              2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3569>.

   [RFC3688]  Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, <https://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc3688>.

   [RFC3973]  Adams, A., Nicholas, J., and W. Siadak, "Protocol
              Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol
              Specification (Revised)", RFC 3973, DOI 10.17487/RFC3973,
              January 2005, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3973>.

   [RFC4607]  Holbrook, H. and B. Cain, "Source-Specific Multicast for
              IP", RFC 4607, DOI 10.17487/RFC4607, August 2006,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4607>.




Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 91]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   [RFC4610]  Farinacci, D. and Y. Cai, "Anycast-RP Using Protocol
              Independent Multicast (PIM)", RFC 4610,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC4610, August 2006, <https://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc4610>.

   [RFC5015]  Handley, M., Kouvelas, I., Speakman, T., and L. Vicisano,
              "Bidirectional Protocol Independent Multicast (BIDIR-
              PIM)", RFC 5015, DOI 10.17487/RFC5015, October 2007,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5015>.

   [RFC5059]  Bhaskar, N., Gall, A., Lingard, J., and S. Venaas,
              "Bootstrap Router (BSR) Mechanism for Protocol Independent
              Multicast (PIM)", RFC 5059, DOI 10.17487/RFC5059, January
              2008, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5059>.

   [RFC5060]  Sivaramu, R., Lingard, J., McWalter, D., Joshi, B., and A.
              Kessler, "Protocol Independent Multicast MIB", RFC 5060,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5060, January 2008, <https://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc5060>.

   [RFC5246]  Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
              (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008, <https://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc5246>.

   [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.

   [RFC6242]  Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
              Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.

   [RFC6536]  Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
              Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model", RFC 6536,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6536, March 2012, <https://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc6536>.

   [RFC6991]  Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
              RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.

   [RFC7761]  Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., Kouvelas, I.,
              Parekh, R., Zhang, Z., and L. Zheng, "Protocol Independent
              Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification
              (Revised)", STD 83, RFC 7761, DOI 10.17487/RFC7761, March
              2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7761>.



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 92]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   [RFC7950]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
              RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.

   [RFC8040]  Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
              Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.

   [RFC8294]  Liu, X., Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Hopps, C., and L. Berger,
              "Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area", RFC 8294,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8294, December 2017, <https://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc8294>.

   [I-D.ietf-netmod-revised-datastores]
              Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
              and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore
              Architecture", draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-10
              (work in progress), January 2018.

   [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis]
              Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
              Management", draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03 (work in
              progress), January 2018.

   [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis]
              Lhotka, L., Lindem, A., and Y. Qu, "A YANG Data Model for
              Routing Management (NMDA Version)", draft-ietf-netmod-
              rfc8022bis-11 (work in progress), January 2018.

   [I-D.ietf-bfd-yang]
              Rahman, R., Zheng, L., Jethanandani, M., Networks, J., and
              G. Mirsky, "YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding
              Detection (BFD)", draft-ietf-bfd-yang-09 (work in
              progress), January 2018.

11.2.  Informative References

   [RFC3376]  Cain, B., Deering, S., Kouvelas, I., Fenner, B., and A.
              Thyagarajan, "Internet Group Management Protocol, Version
              3", RFC 3376, DOI 10.17487/RFC3376, October 2002,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3376>.

   [RFC3618]  Fenner, B., Ed. and D. Meyer, Ed., "Multicast Source
              Discovery Protocol (MSDP)", RFC 3618,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3618, October 2003, <https://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc3618>.





Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 93]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   [RFC3810]  Vida, R., Ed. and L. Costa, Ed., "Multicast Listener
              Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6", RFC 3810,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC3810, June 2004, <https://www.rfc-
              editor.org/info/rfc3810>.

   [RFC5880]  Katz, D. and D. Ward, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
              (BFD)", RFC 5880, DOI 10.17487/RFC5880, June 2010,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5880>.

   [RFC6388]  Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Minei, I., Ed., Kompella, K., and B.
              Thomas, "Label Distribution Protocol Extensions for Point-
              to-Multipoint and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Label Switched
              Paths", RFC 6388, DOI 10.17487/RFC6388, November 2011,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6388>.

   [RFC7942]  Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running
              Code: The Implementation Status Section", BCP 205,
              RFC 7942, DOI 10.17487/RFC7942, July 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>.

   [RFC7951]  Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG",
              RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, August 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7951>.

   [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis]
              Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG
              Data Model Documents", draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-17
              (work in progress), February 2018.

   [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams]
              Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, "YANG Tree Diagrams", draft-
              ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-06 (work in progress),
              February 2018.


















Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 94]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


Appendix A.  Data Tree Example

   This section contains an example of an instance data tree in the JSON
   encoding [RFC7951], containing both configuration and state data.

                       lo0: 2001:db8:0:200::1 (RP address)
                             |   +-------+   |
                             |   | Router|   |
                       eth21 +---+  R2   +---+ eth23
                             |   | (RP)  |   |
                             |   +-------+   | lo0: 2001:db8:0:300::1
              |  +-------+   |               |   +-------+  |
              |  | Router|   |               |   | Router|  |
        eth10 +--+  R1   +---+ eth12   eth32 +---+  R3   +--+ eth30
              |  |       |   |               |   |       |  |
              |  +-------+   |                   +-------+  |
   +-------+  |              |   +-------+                  |  +-------+
   |       |  |              |   | Router|   |              |  |       |
   |       +--+              +---+  R4   +---+   +-------+  +--+       |
   |       |  |              |   |       |   |   | Router|  |  |       |
   +-------+  |              |   +-------+   +---+  R5   |  |  +-------+
    Source                                   |   |       |      Receiver
                                             |   +-------+

   The configuration instance data tree for Router R3 in the above
   figure could be as follows:

   {
     "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
       "interface": [
         {
           "name": "lo0",
           "description": "R3 loopback interface.",
           "type": "iana-if-type:softwareLoopback",
           "ietf-ip:ipv6": {
             "address": [
               {
                 "ip": "2001:db8:0:300::1",
                 "prefix-length": 64
               }
             ],
           }
         },
         {
           "name": "eth30",
           "description": "An interface connected to the receiver.",
           "type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
           "ietf-ip:ipv6": {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 95]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


             "forwarding": true
           }
         },
         {
           "name": "eth32",
           "description": "An interface connected to RP (R2).",
           "type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
           "ietf-ip:ipv6": {
             ],
             "forwarding": true
           }
         }
       ]
     },
     "ietf-routing:routing": {
       "router-id": "203.0.113.3",
       "control-plane-protocols": {
         "ietf-pim-base:pim": {
           "address-family": [
             {
               "address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
               "ietf-pim-rp:rp": {
                 "static-rp": {
                   "ipv6-rp": [
                     {
                       "rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
                       "ietf-pim-sm:sm" {
                       }
                     }
                   ]
                 }
               }
             }
           ],
           "interfaces": {
             "interface": [
               {
                 "name": "lo0",
                 "address-family": [
                   {
                     "address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
                     "hello-interval": "ietf-routing-types:infinity",
                     "pim-sm:sm": [null]
                   }
                 ]
               },
               {
                 "name": "eth30",



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 96]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                 "address-family": [
                   {
                     "address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
                     "pim-sm:sm": [null]
                   }
                 ]
               },
               {
                 "name": "eth32",
                 "address-family": [
                   {
                     "address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
                     "pim-sm:sm": [null]
                   }
                 ]
               }
             ]
           }
         }
       }
     }
   }

   The cooresponding operational state data for Router R3 could be as
   follows:

   {
     "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
       "interface": [
         {
           "name": "lo0",
           "description": "R3 loopback interface.",
           "type": "iana-if-type:softwareLoopback",
           "phys-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:03",
           "oper-status": "up",
           "statistics": {
             "discontinuity-time": "2018-01-23T12:34:56-05:00"
           },
           "ietf-ip:ipv6": {
             "mtu": 1500,
             "address": [
               {
                 "ip": "2001:db8:0:300::1",
                 "prefix-length": 64
                 "origin": "static",
                 "status": "preferred"
               },
               {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 97]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                 "ip": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5303",
                 "prefix-length": 64,
                 "origin": "link-layer",
                 "status": "preferred"
               }
             ],
             "neighbor": [
             ]
           }
         },
         {
           "name": "eth30",
           "description": "An interface connected to the receiver.",
           "type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
           "phys-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:30",
           "oper-status": "up",
           "statistics": {
             "discontinuity-time": "2018-01-23T12:34:56-05:00"
           },
           "ietf-ip:ipv6": {
             "forwarding": true,
             "mtu": 1500,
             "address": [
               {
                 "ip": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5330",
                 "prefix-length": 64,
                 "origin": "link-layer",
                 "status": "preferred"
               }
             ],
             "neighbor": [
             ]
           }
         },
         {
           "name": "eth32",
           "description": "An interface connected to RP (R2).",
           "type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
           "phys-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:32",
           "oper-status": "up",
           "statistics": {
             "discontinuity-time": "2018-01-23T12:34:56-05:00"
           },
           "ietf-ip:ipv6": {
             "forwarding": true,
             "mtu": 1500,
             "address": [
               {



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 98]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                 "ip": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5332",
                 "prefix-length": 64,
                 "origin": "link-layer",
                 "status": "preferred"
               }
             ],
             "neighbor": [
               {
                 "ip": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5323",
                 "link-layer-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:23",
                 "origin": "dynamic",
                 "is-router": [null],
                 "state": "reachable"
               }
             ]
           }
         }
       ]
     },
     "ietf-routing:routing": {
       "router-id": "203.0.113.1",
       "interfaces": {
         "interface": [
           "lo0",
           "eth30",
           "eth32"
         ]
       },
       "control-plane-protocols": {
         "ietf-pim-base:pim": {
           "address-family": [
             {
               "address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
               "statistics": {
                 "discontinuity-time": "2018-01-23T12:34:56-05:00"
               },
               "topology-tree-info": {
                 "ipv6-route": [
                   {
                     "group": "ff06::1",
                     "source-address": "ietf-routing-types:*",
                     "is-rpt": true,
                     "expiration": 16,
                     "incoming-interface": "eth32",
                     "is-spt": false,
                     "mode": "asm",
                     "msdp-learned": false,
                     "rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018               [Page 99]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                     "rpf-neighbor": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5323",
                     "up-time": 123400,
                     "outgoing-interface": [
                       {
                         "name": "eth30",
                         "expiration": 36,
                         "up-time": 223400,
                         "jp-state": "join"
                       }
                     ]
                   },
                   {
                     "group": "ff06::1",
                     "source-address": "2001:db8:1:1::100",
                     "is-rpt": false,
                     "expiration": 8,
                     "incoming-interface": "eth32",
                     "is-spt": true,
                     "mode": "asm",
                     "msdp-learned": false,
                     "rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
                     "rpf-neighbor": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5323",
                     "up-time": 5200,
                     "outgoing-interface": [
                       {
                         "name": "eth30",
                         "expiration": 6,
                         "up-time": 5600,
                         "jp-state": "join"
                       }
                     ]
                   }
                 ]
               },
               "ietf-pim-rp:rp": {
                 "static-rp": {
                   "ipv6-rp": [
                     {
                       "rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
                       "ietf-pim-sm:sm" {
                       }
                     }
                   ]
                 },
                 "rp-list": {
                   "ipv6-rp": [
                     {
                       "rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018              [Page 100]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                       "mode": "ietf-pim-sm:sm",
                       "info-source-type": "static",
                       "up-time": 323400,
                       "expiration": "ietf-routing-types:not-set"
                     }
                   ]
                 }
                 "rp-mappings": {
                   "ipv6-rp": [
                     {
                       "group": "ff06::1",
                       "rp-address": "2001:db8:0:200::1",
                       "up-time": 123400,
                       "expiration": "36"
                     }
                   ]
                 }
               }
             }
           ],
           "interfaces": {
             "interface": [
               {
                 "name": "lo0",
                 "address-family": [
                   {
                     "address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
                     "hello-interval": "ietf-routing-types:infinity",
                     "pim-sm:sm": [null],
                     "oper-status": "up",
                     "gen-id": 103689,
                     "hello-expiration": "ietf-routing-types:infinity",
                     "ipv6": {
                       "address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5303",
                       "dr-address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5303"
                     },
                     "neighbors": {
                       "ipv6-neighbor": [
                       ]
                     }
                   }
                 ]
               },
               {
                 "name": "eth30",
                 "address-family": [
                   {
                     "address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018              [Page 101]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


                     "pim-sm:sm": [null]
                     "oper-status": "up",
                     "gen-id": 203689,
                     "hello-expiration": 18,
                     "ipv6": {
                       "address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5330",
                       "dr-address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5330"
                     },
                     "neighbors": {
                       "ipv6-neighbor": [
                       ]
                     }
                   }
                 ]
               },
               {
                 "name": "eth32",
                 "address-family": [
                   {
                     "address-family": "ietf-routing:ipv6",
                     "pim-sm:sm": [null]
                     "oper-status": "up",
                     "gen-id": 303689,
                     "hello-expiration": 21,
                     "ipv6": {
                       "address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5332",
                       "dr-address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5332"
                     },
                     "neighbors": {
                       "ipv6-neighbor": [
                         {
                           "address": "fe80::200:5eff:fe00:5323",
                           "expiration": 28,
                           "dr-priority": 1,
                           "gen-id": 102,
                           "lan-prune-delay": {
                             "present": false
                           },
                           "up-time": 323500
                         }
                       ]
                     }
                   }
                 ]
               }
             ]
           }
         }



Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018              [Page 102]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


       }
     }
   }

Authors' Addresses

   Xufeng Liu
   Jabil
   8281 Greensboro Drive, Suite 200
   McLean  VA 22102
   USA

   EMail: Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com


   Pete McAllister
   Metaswitch Networks
   100 Church Street
   Enfield  EN2 6BQ
   UK

   EMail: pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com


   Anish Peter
   Individual

   EMail: anish.ietf@gmail.com


   Mahesh Sivakumar
   Cisco Systems
   510 McCarthy Boulevard
   Milpitas, California
   USA

   EMail: masivaku@cisco.com


   Yisong Liu
   Huawei Technologies
   Huawei Administration Building
   Longgang, Guangdong  518129
   China

   EMail: liuyisong@huawei.com





Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018              [Page 103]


Internet-Draft                  PIM YANG                   February 2018


   Fangwei Hu
   ZTE Corporation
   889 Bibo Road
   Shanghai, Shanghai  201203
   China

   EMail: hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn












































Liu, et al.              Expires August 30, 2018              [Page 104]