Internet Engineering Task Force MMUSIC WG
Internet Draft J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-offer-answer-00.txt dynamicsoft,Columbia U.
January 31, 2002
Expires: July 2002
An Offer/Answer Model with SDP
STATUS OF THIS MEMO
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
To view the list Internet-Draft Shadow Directories, see
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
Abstract
This document defines a mechanism by which two entities can make use
of SDP to arrive at a common view of a multimedia session between
them. In the model, one participant offers the other a description of
the desired session from their perspective, and the other participant
answers with the desired session from their perspective. This
offer/answer model is most useful in unicast sessions where
information from both participants is needed for the complete view of
the session. The offer/answer model is used by protocols like the
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP).
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page a]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ........................................ 2
2 Terminology ......................................... 3
3 Definitions ......................................... 3
4 Protocol Operation .................................. 3
5 Generating the initial offer ........................ 4
5.1 Unicast Streams ..................................... 5
5.2 Multicast Streams ................................... 8
6 Generating the answer ............................... 8
6.1 Unicast Streams ..................................... 8
6.2 Multicast Streams ................................... 11
7 Offerer Processing of the Answer .................... 11
8 Modifying the session ............................... 11
8.1 Adding a media stream ............................... 12
8.2 Removing a media stream ............................. 13
8.3 Modifying a Media Stream ............................ 13
8.3.1 Modifying Address, Port or Transport ................ 13
8.3.2 Changing the Set of Media Formats ................... 14
8.3.3 Changing Media Types ................................ 15
8.3.4 Changing Attributes ................................. 15
8.4 Putting a media stream on hold ...................... 16
9 Indicating Capabilities ............................. 16
10 Example Offer/Answer Exchanges ...................... 17
10.1 Basic Exchange ...................................... 17
10.2 One of N Codec Selection ............................ 19
11 Changes since draft-rosenberg-mmusic-sdp-offer-
answer-00 ...................................................... 21
12 Author's Addresses .................................. 22
13 Bibliography ........................................ 23
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 1]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
1 Introduction
The Session Description Protocol (SDP) [1] was originally conceived
as a way to describe multicast sessions carried on the Mbone. The
Session Announcement Protocol (SAP) [2] was devised as a multicast
mechanism to carry SDP messages. Although the SDP specification
allows for unicast operation, it is not complete. Unlike multicast,
where there is a global view of the session that is used by all
participants, unicast sessions involve two participants, and a
complete view of the session requires information from both
participants, and agreement on parameters between them.
As an example, a multicast session requires conveying a single
multicast address for a particular media stream. However, for a
unicast session, two addresses are needed - one for each participant.
As another example, a multicast session requires indication of which
codecs will be used in the session. However, for unicast, the set of
codecs needs to be determined by finding an overlap in the set
supported by each participant.
As a result, even though SDP has the expressiveness to describe
unicast sessions, it is missing the semantics and operational details
of how it is actually done. In this document, we remedy that by
defining a simple offer/answer model based on SDP. In this model, one
participant in the session generates an SDP that constitutes the
offer - the set of media streams and codecs the offerer wishes to
use, along with the IP addresses and ports the offer would like to
use to receive the media. The offer is conveyed to the other
participant, called the answerer. The answerer generates an answer,
which is an SDP that responds to the offer provided it. The answer
has a matching media stream for each one in the offer, indicating
whether the stream is accepted or not, along with the codecs that
will be used and the IP addresses and ports that the answerer wants
to use to receive media.
It is also possible for a multicast session to work similarly to a
unicast one; its parameters are negotiation between a pair of users
as in the unicast case, but both sides send packets to the same
multicast address, rather than unicast ones. This document also
discusses the application of the offer/answer model to multicast
streams.
We also define guidelines for how the offer/answer model is used to
update a session once it has begun.
The means by which the offers and answers are conveyed are outside
the scope of this document. The offer/answer model defined here is
the mandatory baseline mechanism used by the Session Initiation
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 2]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
Protocol (SIP) [3].
2 Terminology
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED",
"SHALL", "SHALLNOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY",
and "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [4] and
indicate requirement levels for compliant implementations.
3 Definitions
The following terms are used throughout this document:
Agent: An agent is the protocol implementation involved in the
offer/answer exchange. There are two agents involved in an
offer/answer exchange.
Answer: An SDP message sent by an answerer in response to an
offer received from an offerer.
Answerer: An agent capable of sending and/or receiving media,
which receives a session description from another agent
describing aspects of desired media communication, and then
responds to that with its own session description.
Media Stream: From RTSP [5], a media stream is a single media
instance, e.g., an audio stream or a video stream as well
as a single whiteboard or shared application group. In SDP,
a media stream is described by an m-line and its associated
attributes.
Offer: An SDP message sent by an offerer.
Offerer: An agent capable of sending and/or receiving media,
which generates a session description in order to create or
modify a session.
4 Protocol Operation
The offer/answer exchange assumes the existence of a higher layer
protocol (such as SIP) which is capable of exchanging SDP for the
purposes of communication establishment between agents.
Protocol operation begins when one agent sends an initial offer to
another agent. An offer is initial if it is outside of any context
that may have already been established through the higher layer
protocol. It is assumed that the higher layer protocol provides
maintenance of some kind of context which allows the various SDP
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 3]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
exchanges to be associated together.
The agent receiving the offer MAY generate an answer, or it MAY
reject the offer. The means for rejecting an offer are dependent on
the higher layer protocol. The offer/answer exchange is atomic; if
the answer is rejected, the session reverts to the state prior to the
offer (which may be absence of a session).
At any time, either agent MAY generate a new offer that updates the
communications session. However, it MUST NOT generate a new offer if
it has received an offer which it has not yet answered or reject.
Furthermore, it MUST NOT generate a new offer if it has generated a
prior offer for which it has not yet received an answer or a
rejection. The higher layer protocol will need to provide a means for
ordering of messages in each direction.
5 Generating the initial offer
The offer (and answer) MUST be a valid SDP, as defined by RFC 2327
[1], with one exception. RFC2327 mandates that either an e or a p
line is present in the SDP. This specification relaxes that
constraint; an SDP formulated for an offer/answer application MAY
omit both the e and p lines. The numeric value of the session id and
version in the o line MUST be representable with a 64 bit signed
integer. Although the SDP specification allows for multiple session
descriptions to be concatenated together into a large SDP message, an
SDP message used in the offer/answer model MUST contain only a single
session description.
The SDP "s=" line conveys the subject of the media stream, which is
reasonably defined for multicast, but ill defined for unicast. For
unicast streams, it is RECOMMENDED that it consist of a single space
character (0x20).
Unfortunately, SDP does not allow the "s=" line to be
empty.
The SDP "t=" line conveys the time of the session. Generally, streams
for unicast sessions are created and destroyed through external
signaling means, such as SIP. In that case, the "t=" line SHOULD have
a value of "0 0".
The offer MAY contain zero or more media streams (each media stream
is described by an m line and its associated attributes). Zero media
streams implies that the offerer wishes to communicate, but that the
streams for the session will be added at a later time through a
modified offer. The streams MAY be for a mix unicast and multicast;
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 4]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
the latter obviously implies a multicast address in the c line.
Construction of each offered stream depends on whether the stream is
multicast or unicast.
5.1 Unicast Streams
If the offerer wishes to only send media on a stream to its peer, it
MUST include an a=sendonly attribute as part of the media
description. If the offerer wishes to only receive media from its
peer, it MUST include an a=recvonly attribute as part of the media
description. If the offerer wishes to communicate, but wishes to
neither send nor receive media at this time, it MUST include an
a=inactive attribute as part of the media description. The inactive
direction attribute is specified in RFC 3108 [6]. Note that in the
case of the Real Time Transport Protocol (RTP) [7], RTCP is still
sent and received for sendonly, recvonly and inactive streams. That
is, the directionality of the media stream has no impact on the RTCP
usage. If the offerer wishes to both send and receive media with its
peer, it MAY include an a=sendrecv attribute, or MAY omit it, since
it is the default.
For recvonly and sendrecv streams, the port number and address in the
offer indicate where the offer would like to receive the media
stream. For sendonly RTP streams, the address and port number
indirectly indicate where RTCP reports are to be sent to.
Specifically, RTCP reports are sent to the port number one higher
than the number indicated. The IP address and port present in the
offer indicate nothing about the source IP address and source port of
RTP and RTCP packets that will be sent by the offerer. A port number
of zero in the offer indicates that the stream is offered but should
never be used. This has no useful semantics in an initial offer, but
is allowed for reasons of completeness, since the response can
contain a zero port indicating a rejected stream (Section 6).
Furthermore, existing streams can be terminated by setting the port
to zero (Section 8). In general, a port number of zero indicates that
the media stream is not wanted.
The list of media formats for each media stream conveys two pieces of
information, namely the set of formats (codecs and any parameters
associated with the codec, in the case of RTP) that the offerer is
capable of sending and/or receiving (depending on the direction
attributes), and, in the case of RTP, the RTP payload type numbers
used to identify those formats. If multiple formats are listed, it
means that the offerer is capable of making use of any of those
formats during the session. In other words, the answerer MAY change
formats in the middle of the session, without sending a new offer, to
make use of any of those listed. For a sendonly stream, the offer
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 5]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
SHOULD indicate those formats the offerer is willing to send for this
stream. For a recvonly stream, the offer SHOULD indicate those
formats the offerer is willing to receive for this stream. For a
sendrecv stream, the offer SHOULD indicate those codecs that the
offerer is willing to send and receive with.
For recvonly RTP streams, the payload type numbers indicate the value
of the payload type field in RTP packets the offerer is expecting to
receive for that codec. For sendonly RTP streams, the payload type
numbers indicate the value of the payload type field in RTP packets
the offerer is planning to send for that codec type. For sendrecv RTP
streams, the payload type numbers indicate the value of the payload
type field the offerer expects to receive, and would prefer to send.
However, for sendonly and sendrecv streams, the answer might indicate
different payload type numbers for the same codecs, in which case,
the offerer MUST send with the payload type numbers from the answer.
Different payload type numbers may be needed in each
direction because of interoperability concerns with H.323.
As per RFC 2327, fmtp parameters MAY be present to provide additional
parameters of the media format.
In the case of RTP streams, all media descriptions SHOULD contain
"a=rtpmap" mappings from RTP payload types to encodings. If there is
no "a=rtpmap", the static payload type table from RFC 1890 [8] is to
be used.
This allows easier migration away from static payload
types.
In all cases, the formats in the m line MUST be listed in order of
preference, with the first format listed being preferred. In this
case, preferred means that the recipient of the offer SHOULD use the
format with the highest preference that is acceptable to it.
If the ptime attribute is present for a stream, it indicates the
desired packetization interval that the offerer would like to
receive.
If the bandwidth attribute is present for a stream, it indicates the
desired bandwidth that the offerer would like to receive. A value of
zero is allowed, but discouraged. It indicates that no media should
be sent. In the case of RTP, it would also disable all RTCP.
If multiple media streams of different types are present, it means
that the offerer wishes to use those streams at the same time. A
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 6]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
typical case is an audio and video stream as part of a
videoconference.
If multiple media streams of the same type are present in an offer,
it means that the offerer wishes to send (and/or receive) multiple
streams of that type at the same time. When sending multiple streams
of the same type, it is a matter of local policy as to how each media
source of that type (for example, a video camera and VCR in the case
of video) is mapped to each stream. When a user has a single source
for a particular media type, only one policy makes sense - that
source is sent to each stream of the same type. Each stream MAY use
different encodings. When receiving multiple streams of the same
type, it is a matter of local policy as to how each stream is mapped
to the various media sinks for that particular type (for example,
speakers or a recording device in the case of audio). There are a few
constraints on the policies, however. First, when receiving multiple
streams of the same type, each stream MUST be mapped to at least one
sink for the purpose of presentation to the user. In other words, the
intent of receiving multiple streams of the same type is that they
should all be presented in parallel, rather than choosing just one.
Another constraint is that when multiple streams are received and
sent to the same sink, they MUST be combined in some media specific
way. For example, in the case of two audio streams, the received
media from each might be mapped to the speakers. In that case, the
combining operation would be to mix them. In the case of multiple
instant messaging streams, where the sink is the screen, the
combining operation would be to present all of them to the user
interface. The third constraint is that if multiple sources are
mapped to the same stream, those sources MUST be combined in some
media specific way before they are sent on the stream. Although
policies beyond these constraints are flexible, an agent won't
generally want a policy that will copy media from its sinks to its
sources unless it is a conference server (i.e., don't copy received
media on one stream to another stream).
A typical usage example for multiple media streams of the same type
is a pre-paid calling card application, where the user can enter in a
"long pound" at any time during a call to hangup and make a new call
on the same card. This requires media from the user to two
destinations - the remote gateway, and to DTMF processing application
which looks for the long pound. This would be accomplished with two
media streams, one sendrecv to the gateway, and the other sendonly
(from the perspective of the user) to the DTMF application.
Once the offerer has sent the offer, it MUST be prepared to receive
media for any recvonly streams described by that offer. It MUST be
prepared to send and receive media for any sendrecv streams in the
offer (of course, it cannot actually send until the peer provides an
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 7]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
answer with the needed address and port information). It MUST be
prepared to receive media for recvonly or sendrecv streams using any
media formats listed for those streams in the offer. In the case of
RTP, even though it may receive media before the answer arrives, it
will not be able to send RTCP receiver reports until the answer
arrives.
5.2 Multicast Streams
If a session description contains a multicast media stream which is
listed as send (receive) only, it means that the answerer can only
send (receive) on that stream. The reversal of semantics for
multicast is an artifact of the strong multicast bias of RFC 2327.
Beyond that clarification, the semantics of an offered multicast
stream are exactly as described in RFC 2327 [1].
6 Generating the answer
The answer to an offered SDP is based on the offered SDP. If the
answer is different from the offer in any way (different IP
addresses, ports, etc.), the origin line MUST be different in the
answer, since the answer is generated by a different entity. In that
case, the version number in the o line of the answer is unrelated to
the version number in the o line of the offer.
For each m line in the offer, there MUST be a corresponding m line in
the answer. The answer MUST contain exactly the same number of m
lines as the offer. This allows for streams to be matched up based on
their order. This implies that if the offer contained zero m lines,
the answer MUST contain zero m lines.
The t line in the answer MUST equal that of the offer. The time of
the session cannot be negotiated.
An offered stream MAY be rejected in the answer, for any reason. If a
stream is rejected, the offerer and answerer MUST NOT generate media
(or RTCP packets) for that stream. To reject an offered stream, the
port number in the corresponding stream in the answer is set to zero.
Any media formats listed are ignored. At least one MUST be present,
as specified by SDP.
Constructing an answer for each offered stream differs for unicast
and multicast.
6.1 Unicast Streams
If a stream is offered with a unicast address, the answer MUST
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 8]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
contain a unicast address. The media type of the stream in the answer
MUST match that of the offer.
If a stream is offered as sendonly, the corresponding stream MUST be
marked as recvonly or inactive in the answer. If a media stream is
listed as recvonly in the offer, the answer MUST be marked as
sendonly or inactive in the answer. If an offered media stream is
listed as sendrecv (or contains no direction attribute, in which case
it is sendrecv by default), the corresponding stream in the answer
MAY be marked as sendonly, recvonly, sendrecv, or inactive in the
answer. If an offered media stream is listed as inactive, it MUST be
marked as inactive in the answer.
For streams marked as recvonly in the answer, the m line MUST contain
at least one media format the answerer is willing to receive with
from amongst those listed in the offer. The stream MAY indicate
additional media formats, not listed in the corresponding stream in
the offer, that the answerer is willing to receive with. For streams
marked as sendonly in the answer, the m line MUST contain at least
one media format the answerer is willing to send with from amongst
those listed in the offer. For streams marked as sendrecv in the
answer, the m line MUST contain at least one codec the answerer is
willing to both send and receive with, from amongst those listed in
the offer. For streams marked as inactive in the answer, the list of
media formats is constructed based on the offer. If the offer was
sendonly, the list is constructed as if the answer were recvonly.
Similarly, if the offer was recvonly, the list is constructed as if
the answer were sendonly, and if the offer was sendrecv, the list is
constructed as if the answer were sendrecv. If the offer was
inactive, the list is constructed as if the offer were actually
sendrecv and the answer were sendrecv.
The connection address and port in the answer indicate the address
where the answerer wishes to receive media (in the case of RTP, RTCP
will be received on the port which is one higher). This address and
port MUST be present even for sendonly streams; in the case of RTP,
the port one higher is still used to receive RTCP.
In the case of RTP, if a particular codec was referenced with a
specific payload type number in the offer, that same payload type
number SHOULD be used for that codec in the answer. Even if the same
payload type number is used, the answer MUST contain rtpmap
attributes to define the payload type mappings for dynamic types, and
SHOULD contain mappings for static payload types. The media formats
in the m line MUST be listed in order of preference, with the first
format listed being preferred. In this case, preferred means that the
offerer SHOULD use the format with the highest preference from the
answer.
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 9]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
Although the answerer MAY list the formats in their desired order of
preference, it is RECOMMENDED that unless there is a specific reason,
the answer list formats in the same relative order they were present
in the offer. In other words, if a stream in the offer lists audio
codecs 8, 22 and 48, in that order, and the answerer only supports
codecs 8 and 48, it is RECOMMENDED that, if the answerer has no
reason to change it, the ordering of codecs in the answer be 8, 48,
and not 48, 8. This helps assure that the same codec is used in both
directions.
The interpretation of fmtp parameters in an offer depends on the
parameters. In many cases, those parameters describe specific
configurations of the media format, and should therefore be processed
as the media format value itself would be. This means that the same
fmtp parameters with the same values MUST be present in the answer if
the media format they describe is present in the answer. Other fmtp
parameters are more like parameters, for which is is perfectly
acceptable for each agent to use different values. In that case, the
answer MAY contain fmtp parameters, and those MAY have the same
values as those in the offer, or MAY be different.
The answerer MAY include a ptime attribute for any media stream; this
indicates the packetization interval that the answerer would like to
receive. There is no requirement that the packetization interval be
the same in each direction for a particular stream.
The answerer MAY include a bandwidth attribute for any media stream;
this indicates the banwdith that the answerer would like the offerer
to use when sending media. The value of zero is allowed, interpreted
as described in Section 5.
If the answerer has no media formats in common for a particular
offered stream, the answerer MUST reject that media stream by setting
the port to zero.
If there are no media formats in common for all streams, the entire
offered session is rejected.
Once the answerer has sent the answer, it MUST be prepared to receive
media for any recvonly streams described by that answer. It MUST be
prepared to send and receive media for any sendrecv streams in the
answer, and MAY send media immediately. It MUST be prepared to
receive media for recvonly or sendrecv streams using any media
formats listed for those streams in the answer, and MAY send media
immediately. When sending media, it SHOULD use a packetization
interval equal to the valueof the ptime attribute in the offer, if
any was present. It SHOULD send media using a banwdith no higher than
the value of the bandwidth attribute in the offer, if any was
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 10]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
present. The answerer SHOULD send using the most preferred codec in
the offer supported by the answerer.
6.2 Multicast Streams
Unlike unicast, where there is a two-sided view of the stream, there
is only a single view of the stream for multicast. As such,
generating an answer to a multicast offer generally involves
modifying a limited set of aspects of the stream.
If a multicast stream is accepted, the address and port information
in the answer MUST match that of the offer. Similarly, the
directionality information in the answer (sendonly, recvonly, or
sendrecv) MUST equal that of the offer.
The set of media formats in the answer MUST be equal to or be a
subset of those in the offer. Removing a format is a way for the
answerer to indicate that the format is not supported.
The ptime and bandwidth attributes in the answer MUST equal the ones
in the offer, if present. If not present, one MAY be added to the
answer.
7 Offerer Processing of the Answer
When the offerer receives the answerer, it MAY send media on that
stream (assuming it is listed as sendrecv or recvonly in the answer).
It SHOULD use the first media format listed in the answer when it
does send.
The reason this is a SHOULD, and not a MUST, is because
there will oftentimes be a need to change codecs on the
fly. For example, during silence periods, an agent might
like to switch to a comfort noise codec. Or, if the user
presses a number on the keypad, the agent might like to
send that using RFC 2833 [9]. Congestion control might
necessitate changing to a lower rate codec based on
feedback.
The offerer SHOULD send media according to the value of any ptime and
bandwidth attribute in the answer.
8 Modifying the session
At any point during the session, either participant MAY issue a new
offer to modify characteristics of the session. It is fundamental to
the operation of the offer/answer model that the exact same
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 11]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
offer/answer procedure defined above is used for modifying parameters
of an existing session.
The offer MAY be identical to the last SDP provided to the other
party (which may have been provided in an offer or an answer), or it
MAY be different. We refer to the last SDP provided as the "previous
SDP". If the offer is the same, the answer MAY be the same as the
previous SDP from the answerer, or it MAY be different. If the
offered SDP is different from the previous SDP, some constraints are
placed on its construction, discussed below.
Nearly all aspects of the session can be modified. New streams can be
added, existing streams can be deleted, and parameters of existing
streams can change. When issuing an offer that modifies the session,
the o line of the new SDP MUST be identical to that in the previous
SDP, except that the version in the origin field MUST increment from
the previous SDP by one. If the version in the origin line does not
increment, the SDP MUST be identical to the SDP with that version
number. The answerer MUST be prepared to receive an offer that
contains SDP with a version that has not changed; this is effectively
a no-op. However, the answerer MUST generate a valid answer (which
MAY be the same as the previous SDP from the answerer, or MAY be
different), according to the procedures defined in Section 6.
If an SDP is offered which is different from the previous SDP, the
new SDP MUST have a matching media section for each media section in
the previous SDP. In other words, if the previous SDP had N media
lines, the new SDP MUST have at least N media lines. The ith media
stream in the previous SDP, counting from the top, matches the ith
media stream in the new SDP, counting from the top. This matching is
necessary in order for the answerer to determine which stream in the
new SDP corresponds to a stream in the previous SDP. Because of these
requirements, the number of m lines in a stream never decreases, but
only increases. Deleted media streams from a previous SDP MUST NOT be
removed from a new SDP.
8.1 Adding a media stream
New media streams are created by new additional media descriptions
below the existing ones, or by reusing the "slot" used by an old
media stream which had been disabled by setting its port to zero. New
media descriptions MUST appear below any existing media sections. The
rules for formatting this media section are identical to those
described in Section 5.
When the answerer receives an SDP with more media descriptions than
the previous SDP from the offerer, or it receives an SDP with a media
stream in a slot where the port was previously zero, the answerer
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 12]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
knows that new media streams are being added. These can be rejected
or accepted by placing a matching media description in the answer.
The procedures for constructing the new media description in the
answer are described in Section 6.
8.2 Removing a media stream
Existing media streams are removed by creating a new SDP with the
port number for that stream set to zero. Otherwise, the media
description SHOULD be formatted identically to the corresponding
stream in the previous SDP.
A stream that is offered with a port of zero MUST be marked with port
zero in the answer. Otherwise, the media description for the removed
stream SHOULD be formatted identically to the corresponding stream in
the previous SDP.
Removal of a media stream implies that media is no longer sent for
that stream. Any resources associated with it can be released. The
user interface might indicate that the stream has terminated, by
closing the associated window on a PC, for example.
8.3 Modifying a Media Stream
Nearly all characteristics of a media stream can be modified.
8.3.1 Modifying Address, Port or Transport
The port number for a stream MAY be changed. To do this, the offerer
creates a new media description, with the port number in the m line
different from the corresponding stream in the previous SDP. If only
the port number is to be changed, the rest of the media stream
description SHOULD remain unchanged. The offerer MUST be prepared to
receive media on both the old and new ports as soon as the offer is
sent. The offerer MUST NOT cease listening for media on the old port
until the answer is received and media arrives on the new port.
Received, in this case, means that the media is passed to an audio
sink. This means that if there is an audio playout buffer, the agent
would continue to listen on the old port until the media on the new
port reached the top of the playout buffer. At that time, it MAY
cease listening for media on the old port.
The corresponding media stream in the answer MAY be the same as the
stream in the previous SDP from the answerer, or MAY be different.
If the updated stream is accepted by the answerer, the answerer
SHOULD begin sending traffic for that stream to the new port
immediately. If the answerer changes the port from the previous SDP,
it MUST be prepared to receive media on both the old and new ports as
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 13]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
soon as the answer is sent. The answerer MUST NOT cease listening for
media on the old port until media arrives on the new port. At that
time, it MAY cease listening for media on the old port.
Of course, if the offered stream is rejected, the offer can cease
being prepared to receive using the new port as soon as the rejection
is received.
To change the IP address where media is sent to, the same procedure
is followed for changing the port number. The only difference is that
the connection line is updated, not the port number.
The transport for a stream MAY be changed. The process for doing this
is identical to changing the port, excepting the transport is
updated, not the port.
8.3.2 Changing the Set of Media Formats
The list of media formats used in the session MAY be changed. To do
this, the offerer creates a new media description, with the list of
media formats in the m line different from the corresponding stream
in the previous SDP. This list MAY include new formats, and MAY
remove formats present from the previous SDP. However, in the case of
RTP, the mapping from a particular dynamic payload type number to a
particular codec MUST NOT change for the duration of a session. For
example, if A generates an offer with G.711 assigned to dynamic
payload type number 46, payload type number 46 MUST refer to G.711
from that point forward in any offers or answers for that session.
However, it is acceptable for multiple payload type numbers to be
mapped to the same codec, so that an updated offer could also use
payload type number 72 for G.711. The mappings need to remain fixed
for the duration of the session because of the loose synchronization
between signaling exchanges of SDP and the media stream.
The corresponding media stream in the answer is formulated as
described in Section 6, and may result in a change in media formats
as well. Similarly, as described in Section 6, as soon as it sends
its answer, the answerer MAY begin sending media using any new codecs
in the offer (assuming the stream allows for sending), and MUST NOT
send using any formats that are not in the offer, even if they were
present in a previous SDP from the peer. Similarly, when the offerer
receives the answer, it MAY begin sending media using any new codecs
in the answer (assuming the stream allows for sending), and MUST NOT
send using any formats that are not in the answer, even if they were
present in a previous SDP from the peer.
When an agent ceases using a media format (by not listing that format
in an offer or answer, even though it was in a previous SDP) the
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 14]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
agent will still need to be prepared to receive media with that
format for a brief time. How does it know when it can be prepared to
stop receiving with that format? If it needs to know, there are three
techniques that can be applied. First, the agent can change ports in
addition to changing formats. When media arrives on the new port, it
knows that the peer has ceased sending with the old format, and it
can cease being prepared to receive with it. This approach has the
benefit of being media format independent. However, changes in ports
may require changes in resource reservation or rekeying of security
protocols. The second approach is to use a totally new set of dynamic
payload types for all codecs when one is discarded. When media is
received with one of the new payload types, the agent knows that the
peer has ceased sending with the old format. This approach doesn't
affect reservations or security contexts, but it is RTP specific and
wasteful of a very small payload type space. A third approach is to
use a timer. When the SDP from the peer is received, the timer is
set. When it fires, the agent can cease being prepared to receive
with the old format. A value of one minute would typically be more
than sufficient. In some cases, an agent may not care, and thus
continually be prepared to receive with the old formats. Nothing need
be done in this case.
Of course, if the offered stream is rejected, the offer can cease
being prepared to receive using any new codecs as soon as the
rejection is received.
8.3.3 Changing Media Types
The media type (audio, video, etc.) for a stream MAY be changed. It
is RECOMMENDED that the media type be changed (as opposed to adding a
new stream), when the same logical data is being conveyed, but just
in a different media format. This is particularly useful for changing
between voiceband fax and fax in a single stream, which are both
separate media types. To do this, the offerer creates a new media
description, with a new media type, in place of the description in
the previous SDP which is to be changed.
The corresponding media stream in the answer is formulated as
described in Section 6. Assuming the stream is acceptable, the
answerer SHOULD begin sending with the new media type and codecs as
soon as it receives the offer.
8.3.4 Changing Attributes
Any other attributes in a media description MAY be updated in an
offer or answer. Generally, an agent MUST send media (if the
directionality of the stream allows) using the new parameters once
the SDP with the change is received.
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 15]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
8.4 Putting a media stream on hold
If a party in a call wants to put the other party "on hold", i.e.,
request that it temporarily stops sending one or more media streams,
a party offers the other an updated SDP.
If the stream to be placed on hold was previously a sendrecv media
stream, it is placed on hold by marking it as sendonly. If the stream
to be placed on hold was previously a recvonly media stream, it is
placed on hold by marking it inactive.
This means that a stream is placed "on hold" separately in each
direction. Each stream is placed "on hold" independently. The
recipient of an offer for a stream on-hold SHOULD NOT automatically
return an answer with the corresponding stream on hold. An SDP with
all streams "on hold" is referred to as held SDP
Certain third party call control scenarios do not work when
a UA responds to held SDP with held SDP.
Typically, when a user "presses" hold, the UA will generate an offer
with all streams in the SDP indicating a direction of sendonly, and
it will also locally mute, so that no media is sent to the far end,
and no media is played out.
RFC 2543 specified that placing a user on hold was accomplished by
setting the connection address to 0.0.0.0. This has been deprecated,
since it doesn't allow for RTCP to be used with held streams, and
breaks with connection oriented media. However, a UA MUST be capable
of receiving SDP with a connection address of 0.0.0.0, in which case
it means that neither RTP nor RTCP should be sent to the peer.
9 Indicating Capabilities
Before an agent sends an offer, it is helpful to know if the media
formats in that offer would be acceptable to the answerer. Certain
protocols, like SIP, provide a means to query for such capabilities.
SDP can be used in responses to such queries to indicate
capabilities. This section describes how such an SDP message is
formatted. The ability of baseline SDP to indicate capabilities is
very limited. It cannot express allowed parameter ranges or values,
and can not be done in parallel with an offer/answer itself.
Extensions might address such limitations in the future.
An SDP constructed to indicate media capabilities is structured as
follows. It MUST be a valid SDP, except that it MAY omit both e and p
lines. The t line MUST be equal to "0 0". For each media type
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 16]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
supported by the agent, there must be a corresponding media
description of that type. The port and connection address have no
meaning, and their values are arbitrary. The transport component of
the m line indicates the preferred transport for that media type. For
each media format of that type supported by the agent, there SHOULD
be a media format listed in the m line. In the case of RTP, if
dynamic payload types are used, an rtpmap attribute MUST be present
to bind the type to a specific format. There is no way to indicate
constraints, such as how many simultaneous streams can be supported
for a particular codec, and so on.
v=0
o=carol 28908764872 28908764872 IN IP4 100.3.6.6
s=-
t=0 0
c=IN IP4 192.0.2.4
m=audio 0 RTP/AVP 0 1 3
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:1 1016/8000
a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
m=video 0 RTP/AVP 31 34
a=rtpmap:31 H261/90000
a=rtpmap:34 H263/90000
Figure 1: SDP Indicating Capabilities
The SDP of Figure 1 indicates that the agent can support three audio
codecs (PCMU, 1016, and GSM) and two video codecs (H.261 and H.263).
10 Example Offer/Answer Exchanges
This section provides example offer/answer exchanges.
10.1 Basic Exchange
Assume that the caller Alice, has included the following description
in her offer. It includes a bidirectional audio stream and two
bidirectional video streams, using H.261 (payload type 31) and MPEG
(payload type 32). The offered SDP is:
v=0
o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 host.anywhere.com
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 17]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
s=
c=IN IP4 host.anywhere.com
t=0 0
m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
m=video 51372 RTP/AVP 31
a=rtpmap:31 H261/90000
m=video 53000 RTP/AVP 32
a=rtpmap:32 MPV/90000
The callee, Bob, does not want to receive or send the first video
stream, so it returns the media description below as the answer:
v=0
o=bob 2890844730 2890844730 IN IP4 host.example.com
s=
c=IN IP4 host.example.com
t=0 0
m=audio 47920 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
m=video 0 RTP/AVP 31
m=video 53000 RTP/AVP 32
a=rtpmap:32 MPV/90000
At some point later, Bob decides to change the port where he will
receive the audio stream (from 47920 to 6400), and at the same time,
add an additional audio stream as receive only, using the RTP payload
format for events [9]. Bob offers the following SDP in the offer:
v=0
o=bob 2890844730 2890844731 IN IP4 host.example.com
s=
c=IN IP4 host.example.com
t=0 0
m=audio 6400 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
m=video 0 RTP/AVP 31
m=video 53000 RTP/AVP 32
a=rtpmap:32 MPV/90000
m=audio 8864 RTP/AVP 110
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 18]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
a=rtpmap:110 telephone-events
a=recvonly
Alice accepts the additional media stream, and so generates the
following answer:
v=0
o=alice 2890844526 2890844527 IN IP4 host.anywhere.com
s=
c=IN IP4 host.anywhere.com
t=0 0
m=audio 49170 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
m=video 51372 RTP/AVP 31
a=rtpmap:31 H261/90000
m=video 53000 RTP/AVP 32
a=rtpmap:32 MPV/90000
m=audio 4520 RTP/AVP 110
a=rtpmap:110 telephone-events
a=sendonly
10.2 One of N Codec Selection
A common occurence in embedded phones is that the DSP used for
compression can support multiple codecs at a time, but once that
codec is selected, it cannot be readily changed on the fly. This
example shows how a session can be set up using an initial
offer/answer exchange, followed immediately by a second one to lock
down the set of codecs.
The initial offer from Alice to Bob indicates a single audio stream
with the three audio codecs that are available in the DSP. The stream
is marked as inactive, since media cannot be received until a codec
is locked down:
v=0
o=alice 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 host.anywhere.com
s=
c=IN IP4 host.anywhere.com
t=0 0
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 19]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
m=audio 6400 RTP/AVP 0 4 18
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=inactive
Bob can support PCMU and G.723 simultaneously. So, he sends the
following answer:
v=0
o=bob 2890844730 2890844731 IN IP4 host.example.com
s=
c=IN IP4 host.example.com
t=0 0
m=audio 6400 RTP/AVP 0 4
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000
a=inactive
Alice can then select any one of these two codecs. So, she sends an
updated offer with a sendrecv stream:
v=0
o=alice 2890844526 2890844527 IN IP4 host.anywhere.com
s=
c=IN IP4 host.example.com
t=0 0
m=audio 6400 RTP/AVP 4
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000
a=sendrecv
Bob accepts the single codec:
v=0
o=bob 2890844730 2890844732 IN IP4 host.example.com
s=
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 20]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
c=IN IP4 host.example.com
t=0 0
m=audio 6400 RTP/AVP 4
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000
a=sendrecv
As an alternative to using a=inactive in the first exchange, Alice
can list all codecs, and as soon as she receives media from Bob,
generate an updated offer locking down the codec to the one just
recevied.
11 Changes since draft-rosenberg-mmusic-sdp-offer-answer-00
o Examples had the wrong ordering of c and t lines
o Eliminated repitions of rfc2327 requirements in section 2.
o Changed e/p line handling, so that the MAY be omitted from an
SDP used for offer/answer applications. Removed from the
examples.
o When modifying the ports/addresses for a media stream, you
have to listen on the old port until media arrives at the new
port, AND the answer arrives.
o Clarified how transitioning of codecs works when an offer
updates the codec set.
o Added text defining how the transitioning of codecs/ports
reverts when the offered stream is rejected.
o Finished extraction of SIP specific text to make this
orthogonal to SIP.
o Generalized the text in 2.1 on sending streams of the same
media type.
o Made multicast/unicast treatment at the stream level, rather
than the SDP level, to handle cases of SDP with mixed unicast
and multicast streams.
o Removed text on rfc2833 hack of adding receive only codecs to
the answer for a sendrecv stream.
o Added a terminology section.
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 21]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
o Added discussion of t line usage.
o Added text on the source/sink/stream mapping policies agreed
at IETF 52.
o Added text allowing for reuse of media slots previously set to
zero.
o Added text describing the three possible approaches for
synchronizing changes in media formats.
o Allow for the dynamic payload type numbers to change in each
direction, but its a SHOULD to use the same ones. Explicitly
called out the H.323 interop issue.
o Added capabilities format.
o Added example showing 1 of N codec selection.
o Clarified that transitions occur not when new media is
received, but when it is played out.
o Added protocol operation section.
o Added discussion on usage of the bandwidth modifier.
12 Author's Addresses
Jonathan Rosenberg
dynamicsoft
72 Eagle Rock Avenue
First Floor
East Hanover, NJ 07936
email: jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com
Henning Schulzrinne
Dept. of Computer Science
Columbia University
1214 Amsterdam Avenue
New York, NY 10027
USA
email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 22]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
13 Bibliography
[1] M. Handley and V. Jacobson, "SDP: session description protocol,"
Request for Comments 2327, Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr.
1998.
[2] M. Handley, C. Perkins, and E. Whelan, "Session announcement
protocol," Request for Comments 2974, Internet Engineering Task
Force, Oct. 2000.
[3] J. Rosenberg, H. Schulzrinne, et al. , "SIP: Session initiation
protocol," Internet Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, Oct.
2001. Work in progress.
[4] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to indicate requirement
levels," Request for Comments 2119, Internet Engineering Task Force,
Mar. 1997.
[5] H. Schulzrinne, A. Rao, and R. Lanphier, "Real time streaming
protocol (RTSP)," Request for Comments 2326, Internet Engineering
Task Force, Apr. 1998.
[6] R. Kumar and M. Mostafa, "Conventions for the use of the session
description protocol (SDP) for ATM bearer connections," Request for
Comments 3108, Internet Engineering Task Force, May 2001.
[7] H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson, "RTP: a
transport protocol for real-time applications," Request for Comments
1889, Internet Engineering Task Force, Jan. 1996.
[8] H. Schulzrinne, "RTP profile for audio and video conferences with
minimal control," Request for Comments 1890, Internet Engineering
Task Force, Jan. 1996.
[9] H. Schulzrinne and S. Petrack, "RTP payload for DTMF digits,
telephony tones and telephony signals," Request for Comments 2833,
Internet Engineering Task Force, May 2000.
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (c) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 23]
Internet Draft offer-answer January 31, 2002
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
J.Rosenberg,H.Schulzrinne [Page 24]
