Network Working Group D. Kumar
Internet-Draft Cisco
Intended status: Standards Track M. Wang
Expires: March 19, 2018 Q. Wu
Huawei
R. Rahman
S. Raghavan
Cisco
September 15, 2017
Generic YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration,
and Maintenance(OAM) protocols
draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-10
Abstract
This document presents a base YANG Data model for connectionless
Operations Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols. It
provides a technology-independent abstraction of key OAM constructs
for connectionless protocols. The base model presented here can be
extended to include technology specific details. This is leading to
uniformity between OAM protocols and support both nested OAM
workflows (i.e., performing OAM functions at different or same levels
through a unified interface) and interacting OAM workflows ( i.e.,
performing OAM functions at same levels through a unified interface).
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on March 19, 2018.
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Overview of the Connectionless OAM Model . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. TP Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. OAM neighboring layers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.4. Test Point Locations Information . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.5. Test Point Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.6. Path Discovery Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.7. Continuity Check Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.8. OAM data hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4. OAM YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5. Connectionless model applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
5.1. BFD Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
5.1.1. Augment Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
5.1.2. Schema Mount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
5.2. LSP ping extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
5.2.1. Augment Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
5.2.2. Schema Mount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
8. Acknowlegements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
1. Introduction
Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) are important
networking functions that allow operators to:
1. Monitor networks connections (Reachability Verification,
Continuity Check).
2. Troubleshoot failures (Fault verification and localization).
3. Monitor Performance
An overview of OAM tools is presented at [RFC7276].
Ping and Traceroute [RFC792], [RFC4443] are well-known fault
verification and isolation tools, respectively, for IP networks.
Over the years, different technologies have developed similar tools
for similar purposes.
The different OAM tools may support connection-oriented technologies
or connectionless technologies. In connection-oriented technologies,
a connection is established prior to the transmission of data. In
connectionless technologies, data is typically sent between end
points without prior arrangement [RFC7276]. Note that the
Connection-Oriented OAM YANG DATA model is defined in
[I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model].
In this document, we presents a base YANG Data model for
connectionless OAM protocols. The generic YANG model for
connectionless OAM only includes configuration data and state data.
It can be used in conjunction with data retrieval method model
[I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods], which focuses on
data retrieval procedures like RPC. However it also can be used
independently of data retrieval method model.
2. Conventions used in this document
The following terms are defined in [RFC6241] and are not redefined
here:
o client
o configuration data
o server
o state data
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
The following terms are defined in [RFC6020] and are not redefined
here:
o augment
o data model
o data node
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in
[RFC6020].
2.1. Terminology
TP - Test Point
MAC - Media Access Control
BFD - Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
RPC - A Remote Procedure Call
RPC operation - A specific Remote Procedure Call.
CC - Continuity Check [RFC7276] , Continuity Checks are used to
verify that a destination is reachable and therefore also referred to
as reachability verification
3. Overview of the Connectionless OAM Model
The model is augmented to "/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node"
[I-D.ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo] using 'test-point-locations'
defined in Section 3.5. The tool attribute 'tp-tools' grouping
defined in this model is corresponding to technology-independent
retrieval procedures (RPC operations) defined in
[I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods] and supports one of
two basic types of activation: proactive and on-demand (determined by
'session-type' grouping defined in this model, see section 3.2).
At the top of the model, there is an 'cc-oper-data' container for
session statistics. Grouping is also defined for common session
statistics and these are only applicable for proactive OAM sessions.
Multiple 'test-point-locations' keyed using technology specific keys
(eg., IPv4 address for IPv4 locations) are augmented into network
nodes which are defined in [I-D.ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo] to
describe the network hierarchies and the inventory of nodes contained
in a network. Each test point location under 'test-point-locations
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
'grouping is chosen based on 'tp-location-type' leaf which when
chosen, leads to a container that includes a list of 'test-point-
locations' keyed by technology specific keys(e.g.,
'ipv4-location'leaf). Each test point location under 'test-point-
locations 'grouping includes a 'test-point-location-info' grouping.
The 'test-point-location-info' grouping includes 'tp-technology'
grouping, 'tp-tools' grouping, and 'connectionless-oam-layers'
grouping. The groupings of 'tp-address' and 'tp-address-ni' are kept
out of 'test-point-location-info' grouping to make it addressing
agnostic and allow varied composition. Depending upon the choice of
the 'tp-location-type' (determined by the 'tp-address-ni'), the
containers differ in its composition of 'test- point-locations' while
the 'test-point-location-info', is a common aspect of every 'test-
point-location'. The 'tp-address-ni' grouping is used to describe
the corresponding network instance. The 'tp-technology'grouping
indicate OAM technology details. The 'tp-tools' grouping describe
the OAM tools supported. The 'connectionless-oam-layers' grouping is
used to describe the relationship of one test point with other test
points. The 'technology-level' in 'oam-neighboring-layers'indicate
relative technology level of neighboring test point corresponding to
the current test point.
3.1. TP Address
In connectionless OAM, the TP address is defined with the following
type:
o MAC address [RFC6136]
o IPv4 or IPv6 address
o TP-attribute
o System-id to represent the device or
node.[I-D.ietf-spring-sr-yang]
To define a forwarding treatment of a test packet, the 'tp-
address'grouping needs to be associated with additional parameters,
e.g. DSCP for IP or EXP (renamed to Traffic Classic in RFC5462) for
MPLS. In generic connectionless OAM YANG model, these parameters are
not explicit configured. The model user can add corresponding
parameters according to their requirements.
3.2. Tools
The different OAM tools may be used in one of two basic types of
activation: proactive and on-demand. The proactive OAM refers to OAM
actions which are carried out continuously to permit proactive
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
reporting of fault. The proactive OAM method requires persistent
configuration. The on-demand OAM refers to OAM actions which are
initiated via manual intervention for a limited time to carry out
diagnostics. The on-demand OAM method requires only transient
configuration.[RFC7276] [G.8013]. In connectionless OAM, 'session-
type' grouping is defined to indicate which kind of activation will
be used by the current session.
In connectionless OAM, the tools attribute is used to describe a
toolset for fault detection and isolation. And it can serve as a
constraint condition when the base model be extended to specific OAM
technology. For example, to fulfill the ICMP PING configuration, the
"../coam:continuity-check" leaf should be set to "true", and then the
lime base model should be augmented with ICMP PING specific details.
3.3. OAM neighboring layers
As typical networks have a multi-layer architecture, the set of OAM
protocols similarly take a multi-layer structure; each layer may has
its own OAM protocol [RFC7276] and is corresponding to specific
administrative domain and has associated test points. OAM-
neighboring-layers is referred to a list of neighboring test points
in the upstream layer and/or downstream layer and the same layer that
are related to current test point. This allows users to easily
navigate between related neighboring layer to efficiently
troubleshoot a defect. In this model, we have kept technology-level
default as 0, when a list of neighboring test points under 'oam-
neighboring-layers' list are located at the same layer as the current
test point. 'Technology-Level'leaf defines the relative technology
level of neighboring test point corresponding to the current test
point in multi-layer and multi-technology networks , and is provided
to allow correlation of faults at different administrative and
technology layers . If there is one neighboring test point at higher
layer of the current test point, 'Technology-level'leaf is set to 1.
If there is one neighboring test point at lower layer of the current
test point, 'Technology-level'leaf is set to -1.
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
list oam-neighboring-layers {
key "index";
leaf index {
type uint8 {
range "0..128";
}
description
"Index of a list of neighboring test points
in the upstream layer and/or downstream layer
and/or same layer ";
}
leaf technology-level {
type int8 {
range "-1..1";
}
description
"The relative technology level
of neighboring test point
corresponding to the current
test point";
}
description
"List of related neighboring test points at upstream layer
and or downstream layer or at the same layer.";
}
3.4. Test Point Locations Information
This is a generic grouping for Test Point Locations Information
(i.e., test-point-location-info grouping). It Provide details of
Test Point Location using 'tp-technology','tp-tool'grouping, 'OAM-
neighboring Layers' grouping defined above.
3.5. Test Point Locations
This is a generic grouping for Test Point Locations. 'tp-location-
type 'leaf is used to define locations types, for example 'ipv4-
location-type', 'ipv6-location-type', etc. Container is defined
under each location type containing list keyed to test point address,
Test Point Location Information defined in section above, and network
instance name(e.g.,VRF instance name) if required.
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
3.6. Path Discovery Data
This is a generic grouping for path discovery data model that can be
retrieved by any data retrieval methods including RPC operations.
Path discovery data output from methods, includes 'src-test-point'
container, 'dst- test-point' container, 'sequence-number'leaf, 'hop-
cnt'leaf, session statistics of various kinds, path verification and
path trace related information. Path discovery includes data to be
retrieved on a 'per- hop' basis via a list of 'path-trace-info-
list'list which includes information like 'timestamp'grouping, '
ingress-intf-name ', ' egress-intf-name ' and 'app-meta-data'. The
path discovery data model is made generic enough to allow different
methods of data retrieval. None of the fields are made mandatory for
that reason. Noted that the retrieval methods are defined in
[I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods].
3.7. Continuity Check Data
This is a generic grouping for continuity check data model that can
be retrieved by any data retrieval methods including RPC operations.
Continuity check data output from methods, includes 'src-test-
point'container, 'dst-test-point'container, 'sequence-number' leaf,
'hop-cnt'leaf and session statistics of various kinds. The
continuity check data model is made generic enough to allow different
methods of data retrieval. None of the fields are made mandatory for
that reason. Noted that the retrieval methods are defined in
[I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods].
3.8. OAM data hierarchy
The complete data hierarchy related to the OAM YANG model is
presented below.
module: ietf-connectionless-oam
+--ro cc-session-statistics-data {continuity-check}?
+--ro cc-ipv4-sessions-statistics
| +--ro cc-session-statistics
| +--ro session-count? uint32
| +--ro session-up-count? uint32
| +--ro session-down-count? uint32
| +--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32
+--ro cc-ipv6-sessions-statistics
+--ro cc-session-statistics
+--ro session-count? uint32
+--ro session-up-count? uint32
+--ro session-down-count? uint32
+--ro session-admin-down-count? uint32
augment /nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node:
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
+--rw tp-location-type? identityref
+--rw location-type
+--rw ipv4-location-type
| +--rw test-point-ipv4-location-list
| +--rw test-point-locations* [ipv4-location ni]
| +--rw ipv4-location inet:ipv4-address
| +--rw ni routing-instance-ref
| +--rw (technology)?
| | +--:(technology-null)
| | +--rw tech-null? empty
| +--rw tp-tools
| | +--rw continuity-check boolean
| | +--rw path-discovery boolean
| +--rw root?
| +--rw oam-neighboring-layers* [index]
| +--rw index uint8
| +--rw technology-level? int8
| +--rw (tp-location)?
| +--:(mac-address)
| | +--rw mac-address-location? yang:mac-address
| +--:(ipv4-address)
| | +--rw ipv4-address-location? inet:ipv4-address
| +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--rw ipv6-address-location? inet:ipv6-address
| +--:(as-number)
| | +--rw as-number-location? inet:as-number
| +--:(system-id)
| +--rw system-id-location? router-id
+--rw ipv6-location-type
| +--rw test-point-ipv6-location-list
| +--rw test-point-locations* [ipv6-location ni]
| +--rw ipv6-location inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw ni routing-instance-ref
| +--rw (technology)?
| | +--:(technology-null)
| | +--rw tech-null? empty
| +--rw tp-tools
| | +--rw continuity-check boolean
| | +--rw path-discovery boolean
| +--rw root?
| +--rw oam-neighboring-layers* [index]
| +--rw index uint8
| +--rw technology-level? int8
| +--rw (tp-location)?
| +--:(mac-address)
| | +--rw mac-address-location? yang:mac-address
| +--:(ipv4-address)
| | +--rw ipv4-address-location? inet:ipv4-address
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
| +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--rw ipv6-address-location? inet:ipv6-address
| +--:(as-number)
| | +--rw as-number-location? inet:as-number
| +--:(system-id)
| +--rw system-id-location? router-id
+--rw mac-location-type
| +--rw test-point-mac-address-location-list
| +--rw test-point-locations* [mac-address-location]
| +--rw mac-address-location yang:mac-address
| +--rw (technology)?
| | +--:(technology-null)
| | +--rw tech-null? empty
| +--rw tp-tools
| | +--rw continuity-check boolean
| | +--rw path-discovery boolean
| +--rw root?
| +--rw oam-neighboring-layers* [index]
| +--rw index uint8
| +--rw technology-level? int8
| +--rw (tp-location)?
| +--:(mac-address)
| | +--rw mac-address-location? yang:mac-address
| +--:(ipv4-address)
| | +--rw ipv4-address-location? inet:ipv4-address
| +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--rw ipv6-address-location? inet:ipv6-address
| +--:(as-number)
| | +--rw as-number-location? inet:as-number
| +--:(system-id)
| +--rw system-id-location? router-id
+--rw group-as-number-location-type
| +--rw test-point-as-number-location-list
| +--rw test-point-locations* [as-number-location]
| +--rw as-number-location inet:as-number
| +--rw ni? routing-instance-ref
| +--rw (technology)?
| | +--:(technology-null)
| | +--rw tech-null? empty
| +--rw tp-tools
| | +--rw continuity-check boolean
| | +--rw path-discovery boolean
| +--rw root?
| +--rw oam-neighboring-layers* [index]
| +--rw index uint8
| +--rw technology-level? int8
| +--rw (tp-location)?
| +--:(mac-address)
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
| | +--rw mac-address-location? yang:mac-address
| +--:(ipv4-address)
| | +--rw ipv4-address-location? inet:ipv4-address
| +--:(ipv6-address)
| | +--rw ipv6-address-location? inet:ipv6-address
| +--:(as-number)
| | +--rw as-number-location? inet:as-number
| +--:(system-id)
| +--rw system-id-location? router-id
+--rw group-system-id-location-type
+--rw test-point-system-info-location-list
+--rw test-point-locations* [system-id-location]
+--rw system-id-location inet:uri
+--rw ni? routing-instance-ref
+--rw (technology)?
| +--:(technology-null)
| +--rw tech-null? empty
+--rw tp-tools
| +--rw continuity-check boolean
| +--rw path-discovery boolean
+--rw root?
+--rw oam-neighboring-layers* [index]
+--rw index uint8
+--rw technology-level? int8
+--rw (tp-location)?
+--:(mac-address)
| +--rw mac-address-location? yang:mac-address
+--:(ipv4-address)
| +--rw ipv4-address-location? inet:ipv4-address
+--:(ipv6-address)
| +--rw ipv6-address-location? inet:ipv6-address
+--:(as-number)
| +--rw as-number-location? inet:as-number
+--:(system-id)
+--rw system-id-location? router-id
4. OAM YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-connectionless-oam@2017-09-06.yang"
module ietf-connectionless-oam {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-connectionless-oam";
prefix coam;
import ietf-yang-schema-mount {
prefix yangmnt;
}
import ietf-network {
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
prefix nd;
}
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix if;
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix inet;
}
import ietf-network-instance {
prefix ni;
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix rt;
}
organization
"IETF LIME Working Group";
contact
"Deepak Kumar dekumar@cisco.com
Qin Wu bill.wu@huawei.com
S Raghavan srihari@cisco.com
Zitao Wang wangzitao@huawei.com
R Rahman rrahman@cisco.com";
description
"This YANG module defines the generic configuration,
data model, statistics for connectionless OAM to be
used within IETF in a protocol independent manner.
It is assumed that each protocol maps corresponding
abstracts to its native format. Each protocol may
extend the YANG model defined here to include protocol
specific extensions";
revision 2017-09-06 {
description
" Base model for Connectionless
Operations, Administration,
and Maintenance(OAM) ";
reference
" RFC XXXX: Connectionless
Operations, Administration, and
Maintenance(OAM)YANG Data Model";
}
feature connection-less {
description
"This feature indicates that OAM solution is connection less.";
}
feature continuity-check {
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
description
"This feature indicates that the server supports
executing continuity check OAM command and
returning a response. Servers that do not advertise
this feature will not support executing
continuity check command or rpc operation model for
continuity check command.";
}
feature path-discovery {
description
"This feature indicates that the server supports
executing path discovery OAM command and
returning a response. Servers that do not advertise
this feature will not support executing
path discovery command or rpc operation model for
path discovery command.";
}
typedef router-id {
type yang:dotted-quad;
description
"A 32-bit number in the dotted quad format assigned to each
router. This number uniquely identifies the router within an
Autonomous System.";
}
typedef routing-instance-ref {
type leafref {
path "/ni:network-instances/ni:network-instance/ni:name";
}
description
"This type is used for leafs that reference a routing instance
configuration.";
}
identity address-attribute-types {
description
"This is base identity of address
attribute types which are ip-prefix,
bgp, tunnel, pwe3, vpls, etc.";
}
typedef address-attribute-type {
type identityref {
base address-attribute-types;
}
description
"Target address attribute type.";
}
identity time-resolution {
description
"Time interval resolution";
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
}
identity hours {
base time-resolution;
description
"Time resolution in Hours";
}
identity minutes {
base time-resolution;
description
"Time resolution in Minutes";
}
identity seconds {
base time-resolution;
description
"Time resolution in Seconds";
}
identity milliseconds {
base time-resolution;
description
"Time resolution in Milliseconds";
}
identity microseconds {
base time-resolution;
description
"Time resolution in Microseconds";
}
identity nanoseconds {
base time-resolution;
description
"Time resolution in Nanoseconds";
}
grouping cc-session-statistics {
description
"Grouping for session statistics.";
container cc-session-statistics {
description
"cc session counters";
leaf session-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"Number of Continuity Check sessions.
A value of zero indicates that no session
count is sent.";
}
leaf session-up-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
description
"Number of sessions which are up.
A value of zero indicates that no up
session count is sent.";
}
leaf session-down-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"Number of sessions which are down.
A value of zero indicates that no down
session count is sent.";
}
leaf session-admin-down-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"Number of sessions which are admin-down.
A value of zero indicates that no admin
down session count is sent.";
}
}
}
grouping session-packet-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per session packet statistics";
container session-packet-statistics {
description
"Per session packet statistics.";
leaf rx-packet-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"Total number of received OAM packet count.
A value of zero indicates that no received
OAM packet count number is sent.";
}
leaf tx-packet-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"Total number of transmitted OAM packet count.
A value of zero indicates that no transmitted
OAM packet count number is sent.";
}
leaf rx-bad-packet {
type uint32;
default "0";
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
description
"Total number of received bad OAM packet.
A value of zero indicates that no received bad
OAM packet count number is sent.";
}
leaf tx-packet-failed {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"Total number of failed sending OAM packet.
A value of zero indicates that no failed
sending OAM packet count number is sent.";
}
}
}
grouping cc-per-session-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per session statistics";
container cc-per-session-statistics {
description
"per session statistics.";
leaf create-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Time and date when session is created.";
}
leaf last-down-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Time and date last time session is down.";
}
leaf last-up-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Time and date last time session is up.";
}
leaf down-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"Total Continuity Check sessions down count.
A value of zero indicates that no
down count per session is sent.";
}
leaf admin-down-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
"Total Continuity Check sessions admin down count.
A value of zero indicates that no
admin down count per session is sent.";
}
uses session-packet-statistics;
}
}
grouping session-error-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per session error statistics";
container session-error-statistics {
description
"Per session error statistics.";
leaf packet-drops-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"Total received packet drops count.
A value of zero indicates that no
packet drops count is sent.";
}
leaf packet-reorder-count {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"Total received packet reordered count.
A value of zero indicates that no packet
reorder count is sent.";
}
leaf packets-out-of-seq-count {
type uint32;
description
"Total received out of sequence count.
A value of zero indicates that no packet
out of sequence count is sent.";
}
leaf packets-dup-count {
type uint32;
description
"Total received packet duplicates count.
A value of zero indicates that no packet
duplicates count is sent.";
}
}
}
grouping session-delay-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per session delay statistics";
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
container session-delay-statistics {
description
"Session delay summarised information.";
leaf time-resolution-value {
type identityref {
base time-resolution;
}
default "milliseconds";
description
"Time units among choice of s,ms,ns etc.";
}
leaf min-delay-value {
type uint32;
description
"Minimum delay value observed.";
}
leaf max-delay-value {
type uint32;
description
"Maximum delay value observed.";
}
leaf average-delay-value {
type uint32;
description
"Average delay value observed.";
}
}
}
grouping session-jitter-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per session jitter statistics";
container session-jitter-statistics {
description
"Session jitter summarised information.";
leaf time-resolution-value {
type identityref {
base time-resolution;
}
default "milliseconds";
description
"Time units among choice of s,ms,ns etc.";
}
leaf min-jitter-value {
type uint32;
description
"Minimum jitter value observed.";
}
leaf max-jitter-value {
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
type uint32;
description
"Maximum jitter value observed.";
}
leaf average-jitter-value {
type uint32;
description
"Average jitter value observed.";
}
}
}
grouping session-path-verification-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per session path verification statistics";
container session-path-verification-statistics {
description
"OAM per session path verification statistics.";
leaf verified-count {
type uint32;
description
"Total number of OAM packets that
went through a path as intended.
A value of zero indicates that no
verified count is sent.";
}
leaf failed-count {
type uint32;
description
"Total number of OAM packets that
went through an unintended path.
A value of zero indicates that no
failed count is sent.";
}
}
}
grouping session-type {
description
"This object indicates which kind
of activation will be used by the current
session.";
leaf session-type {
type enumeration {
enum "proactive" {
description
"The current session is proactive session.";
}
enum "on-demand" {
description
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
"The current session is on-demand session.";
}
}
default "on-demand";
description
"Indicate which kind of activation will be used
by the current session";
}
}
identity tp-address-technology-type {
description
"Test point address type";
}
identity mac-address-type {
base tp-address-technology-type;
description
"MAC address type";
}
identity ipv4-address-type {
base tp-address-technology-type;
description
"IPv4 address type";
}
identity ipv6-address-type {
base tp-address-technology-type;
description
"IPv6 address type";
}
identity tp-attribute-type {
base tp-address-technology-type;
description
"Test point attribute type";
}
identity system-id-address-type {
base tp-address-technology-type;
description
"System id address type";
}
identity as-number-address-type {
base tp-address-technology-type;
description
"AS number address type";
}
identity route-distinguisher-address-type {
base tp-address-technology-type;
description
"Route Distinguisher address type";
}
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
grouping tp-address {
leaf tp-location-types {
type identityref {
base tp-address-technology-type;
}
mandatory true;
description
"Test point address type.";
}
container mac-address {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:mac-address-type')" {
description
"MAC address type";
}
leaf mac-address {
type yang:mac-address;
mandatory true;
description
"MAC Address";
}
description
"MAC Address based MP Addressing.";
}
container ipv4-address {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:ipv4-address-type')" {
description
"IPv4 address type";
}
leaf ipv4-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
mandatory true;
description
"IPv4 Address";
}
description
"IP Address based MP Addressing.";
}
container ipv6-address {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:ipv6-address-type')" {
description
"IPv6 address type";
}
leaf ipv6-address {
type inet:ipv6-address;
mandatory true;
description
"IPv6 Address";
}
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
description
"ipv6 Address based MP Addressing.";
}
container tp-attribute {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:tp-attribute-type')" {
description
"Test point attribute type";
}
leaf tp-attribute-type {
type address-attribute-type;
description
"Test point type.";
}
choice tp-attribute-value {
description
"Test point value.";
case ip-prefix {
leaf ip-prefix {
type inet:ip-prefix;
description
"IP prefix.";
}
}
case bgp {
leaf bgp {
type inet:ip-prefix;
description
"BGP Labeled Prefix ";
}
}
case tunnel {
leaf tunnel-interface {
type uint32;
description
"VPN Prefix ";
}
}
case pw {
leaf remote-pe-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Remote pe address.";
}
leaf pw-id {
type uint32;
description
"Pseudowire ID is a non-zero 32-bit ID.";
reference
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
"RFC 4379 :Detecting Multi-Protocol Label
Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures";
}
}
case vpls {
leaf route-distinguisher {
type rt:route-distinguisher;
description
"Route Distinguisher is an 8 octets identifier
used to distinguish information about various
L2VPN advertised by a node.";
reference
"RFC 4379 :Detecting Multi-Protocol Label
Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures";
}
leaf sender-ve-id {
type uint16;
description
"Sender's VE ID. The VE ID (VPLS Edge Identifier)
is a 2-octet identifier.";
reference
"RFC 4379 :Detecting Multi-Protocol Label
Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures";
}
leaf receiver-ve-id {
type uint16;
description
"Receiver's VE ID.The VE ID (VPLS Edge Identifier)
is a 2-octet identifier.";
reference
"RFC 4379 :Detecting Multi-Protocol Label
Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures";
}
}
case mpls-mldp {
choice root-address {
description
"Root address choice.";
case ip-address {
leaf source-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"IP address.";
}
leaf group-ip-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"Group ip address.";
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
}
}
case vpn {
leaf as-number {
type inet:as-number;
description
"The AS number represents autonomous system
numbers which identify an Autonomous System.";
}
}
case global-id {
leaf lsp-id {
type string;
description
"LSP ID is an identifier of a LSP
within a MPLS network.";
reference
"RFC 4379 :Detecting Multi-Protocol Label
Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures";
}
}
}
}
}
description
"Test Point Attribute Container";
}
container system-info {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:system-id-address-type')" {
description
"System id address type";
}
leaf system-id {
type rt:router-id;
description
"System ID assigned to this node.";
}
description
"system ID container.";
}
description
"TP Address";
}
grouping tp-address-ni {
description
"Test point address with VRF.";
leaf ni {
type routing-instance-ref;
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
description
"The ni is used to describe virtual resource partitioning
that may be present on a network device.Example of common
industry terms for virtual resource partitioning is VRF
instance.";
}
uses tp-address;
}
grouping connectionless-oam-layers {
list oam-neighboring-layers {
key "index";
leaf index {
type uint8{
range "0..128";}
description
"Index of a list of neighboring test points
in the upstream layer and/or downstream layer
and/or same layer";
}
leaf technology-level {
type int8 {
range "-1..1";
}
default "0";
description
"The relative technology level
of neighboring test point
corresponding to the current
test point.Level 0 indicates default level,
-1 means downstream layer related to current layer and +1
means upstream layer related to current layer.
In relationship 0 means same layer.";
}
choice tp-location {
case mac-address {
leaf mac-address-location {
type yang:mac-address;
description
"MAC Address";
}
description
"MAC Address based MP Addressing.";
}
case ipv4-address {
leaf ipv4-address-location {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"Ipv4 Address";
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
}
description
"IP Address based MP Addressing.";
}
case ipv6-address {
leaf ipv6-address-location {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 Address";
}
description
"IPv6 Address based MP Addressing.";
}
case as-number {
leaf as-number-location {
type inet:as-number;
description
"AS number location";
}
description
"AS number for point to multipoint OAM";
}
case system-id {
leaf system-id-location {
type router-id;
description
"System id location";
}
description
"System ID";
}
description
"TP location.";
}
description
"List of neighboring test points in the upstream layer and/or
downstream layer or same layer that are related to current test
point. If neighboring test-point in the upstream layer exist, the
technology-level is specified as +1. If neighboring test-point
in the downstream layer exist, the technology-level is specified
as -1, if neighboring test-points are located at the same layer
as the current test-point, the technology-level is specified as
0.";
}
description
"Connectionless related OAM neighboring layer";
}
grouping tp-technology {
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
choice technology {
default "technology-null";
case technology-null {
description
"This is a placeholder when no technology is needed.";
leaf tech-null {
type empty;
description
"There is no technology define";
}
}
description
"Technology choice.";
}
description
"OAM Technology";
}
grouping tp-tools {
description
"Test Point OAM Toolset.";
container tp-tools {
leaf continuity-check {
type boolean;
mandatory true;
description
"A flag indicating whether or not the
continuity check function is supported.";
reference
"RFC 792: INTERNET CONTROL MESSAGE PROTOCOL.
RFC 4443: Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6)
for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification.
RFC 5880: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection.
RFC 5881: BFD for IPv4 and IPv6.
RFC 5883: BFD for Multihop Paths.
RFC 5884: BFD for MPLS Label Switched Paths.
RFC 5885: BFD for PW VCCV.
RFC 6450: Multicast Ping Protocol.";
}
leaf path-discovery {
type boolean;
mandatory true;
description
"A flag indicating whether or not the
path discovery function is supported.";
reference
"RFC 792: INTERNET CONTROL MESSAGE PROTOCOL.
RFC 4443: Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6)
for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification.
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
RFC 4884: Extended ICMP to Support Multi-part Message.
RFC 5837:Extending ICMP for Interface
and Next-Hop Identification.
RFC 4379: LSP-PING.";
}
description
"Container for test point OAM tools set.";
}
}
grouping test-point-location-info {
uses tp-technology;
uses tp-tools;
anydata root {
yangmnt:mount-point "root";
description
"Root for models supported per
test point";
}
uses connectionless-oam-layers;
description
"Test point Location";
}
grouping test-point-locations {
description
"Group of test point locations.";
leaf tp-location-type {
type identityref {
base tp-address-technology-type;
}
description
"Test point location type.";
}
container ipv4-location-type {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:ipv4-address-type')" {
description
"When test point location type is equal to ipv4 address.";
}
container test-point-ipv4-location-list {
list test-point-locations {
key "ipv4-location ni";
leaf ipv4-location {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"IPv4 Address.";
}
leaf ni {
type routing-instance-ref;
description
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
"The ni is used to describe the
corresponding network instance";
}
uses test-point-location-info;
description
"List of test point locations.";
}
description
"Serves as top-level container
for test point location list.";
}
description
"ipv4 location type container.";
}
container ipv6-location-type {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:ipv6-address-type')" {
description
"when test point location is equal to ipv6 address";
}
container test-point-ipv6-location-list {
list test-point-locations {
key "ipv6-location ni";
leaf ipv6-location {
type inet:ipv6-address;
description
"IPv6 Address.";
}
leaf ni {
type routing-instance-ref;
description
"The ni is used to describe the
corresponding network instance";
}
uses test-point-location-info;
description
"List of test point locations.";
}
description
"Serves as top-level container
for test point location list.";
}
description
"ipv6 location type container.";
}
container mac-location-type {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:mac-address-type')" {
description
"when test point location type is equal to mac address.";
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
}
container test-point-mac-address-location-list {
list test-point-locations {
key "mac-address-location";
leaf mac-address-location {
type yang:mac-address;
description
"MAC Address";
}
uses test-point-location-info;
description
"List of test point locations.";
}
description
"Serves as top-level container
for test point location list.";
}
description
"mac address location type container.";
}
container group-as-number-location-type {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:as-number-address-type')" {
description
"when test point location type is equal to as-number.";
}
container test-point-as-number-location-list {
list test-point-locations {
key "as-number-location";
leaf as-number-location {
type inet:as-number;
description
"AS number for point to multi point OAM.";
}
leaf ni {
type routing-instance-ref;
description
"The ni is used to describe the
corresponding network instance";
}
uses test-point-location-info;
description
"List of test point locations.";
}
description
"Serves as top-level container
for test point location list.";
}
description
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
"as number location type container.";
}
container group-system-id-location-type {
when "derived-from-or-self(../tp-location-type, 'coam:system-id-address-type')" {
description
"when test point location type is equal to system-info.";
}
container test-point-system-info-location-list {
list test-point-locations {
key "system-id-location";
leaf system-id-location {
type inet:uri;
description
"System Id.";
}
leaf ni {
type routing-instance-ref;
description
"The ni is used to describe the
corresponding network instance";
}
uses test-point-location-info;
description
"List of test point locations.";
}
description
"Serves as top-level container for
test point location list.";
}
description
"system ID location type container.";
}
}
augment "/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node" {
description
"Augment test points of connectionless oam.";
uses test-point-locations;
}
grouping uint64-timestamp {
description
"Grouping for timestamp.";
leaf timestamp-sec {
type uint32;
description
"Absolute timestamp in seconds as per IEEE1588v2
or seconds part in 64-bit NTP timestamp.";
}
leaf timestamp-nanosec {
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
type uint32;
description
"Fractional part in nanoseconds as per IEEE1588v2
or Fractional part in 64-bit NTP timestamp.";
}
}
grouping timestamp {
description
"Grouping for timestamp.";
leaf timestamp-type {
type uint32;
description
"Truncated PTP = 0, NTP = 1";
}
uses uint64-timestamp;
}
grouping path-discovery-data {
description
"Path discovery related data output from nodes.";
container src-test-point {
description
"Source test point.";
uses tp-address-ni;
}
container dest-test-point {
description
"Destination test point.";
uses tp-address-ni;
}
leaf sequence-number {
type uint64;
default "0";
description
"Sequence number in data packets.A value of
zero indicates that no sequence number is sent.";
}
leaf hop-cnt {
type uint8;
default "0";
description
"Hop count.A value of zero indicates
that no hop count is sent";
}
uses session-packet-statistics;
uses session-error-statistics;
uses session-delay-statistics;
uses session-jitter-statistics;
container path-verification {
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
description
"Optional path verification related information.";
leaf flow-info {
type string;
description
"Informations that refers to the flow.";
}
uses session-path-verification-statistics;
}
container path-trace-info {
description
"Optional path trace per-hop test point information.
The path trace information list has typically a single
element for per-hop cases like path-discovery RPC operation
but allows a list of hop related information for other types of
data retrieval methods.";
list path-trace-info-list {
key "index";
description
"Path trace information list.";
leaf index {
type uint32;
description
"Trace information index.";
}
uses tp-address-ni;
uses timestamp;
leaf ingress-intf-name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Ingress interface name";
}
leaf egress-intf-name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Egress interface name";
}
leaf queue-depth {
type uint32;
description
"Length of the queue of the interface from where
the packet is forwarded out. The queue depth could
be the current number of memory buffers used by the
queue and a packet can consume one or more memory buffers
thus constituting device-level information.";
}
leaf transit-delay {
type uint32;
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
description
"Time in nano seconds
packet spent transiting a node.";
}
leaf app-meta-data {
type uint64;
description
"Application specific
data added by node.";
}
}
}
}
grouping continuity-check-data {
description
"Continuity check data output from nodes.";
container src-test-point {
description
"Source test point.";
uses tp-address-ni;
leaf egress-intf-name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Egress interface name.";
}
}
container dest-test-point {
description
"Destination test point.";
uses tp-address-ni;
leaf ingress-intf-name {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Ingress interface name.";
}
}
leaf sequence-number {
type uint64;
default "0";
description
"Sequence number in data packets.A value of
zero indicates that no sequence number is sent.";
}
leaf hop-cnt {
type uint8;
default "0";
description
"Hop count.A value of zero indicates
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
that no hop count is sent";
}
uses session-packet-statistics;
uses session-error-statistics;
uses session-delay-statistics;
uses session-jitter-statistics;
}
container cc-session-statistics-data {
if-feature "continuity-check";
config false;
description
"CC operational information.";
container cc-ipv4-sessions-statistics {
description
"CC ipv4 sessions";
uses cc-session-statistics;
}
container cc-ipv6-sessions-statistics {
description
"CC ipv6 sessions";
uses cc-session-statistics;
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
5. Connectionless model applicability
"ietf-connectionless-oam" model defined in this document provides
technology-independent abstraction of key OAM constructs for
connectionless protocols. This model can be further extended to
include technology specific details, e.g., adding new data nodes with
technology specific functions and parameters into proper anchor
points of the base model, so as to develop a technology-specific
connectionless OAM model.
This section demonstrates the usability of the connectionless YANG
OAM data model to various connectionless OAM technologies, e.g., BFD,
LSP ping. Note that, in this section, we only present several
snippets of technology-specific model extensions for illustrative
purposes. The complete model extensions should be worked on in
respective protocol working groups.
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
5.1. BFD Extension
5.1.1. Augment Method
The following sections shows how the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model
can be extended to cover BFD technology. For this purpose, a set of
extension are introduced such as technology-type extension and test-
point attributes extension.
Note that in BFD WG, there is a BFD YANG data model
[I-D.ietf-bfd-yang] to be produced. Users can choose to use "ietf-
connectioless-oam" as basis and augment the "ietf-connectionless-oam"
model with bfd specific details. The bfd specific details can be the
grouping defined in the BFD model.
5.1.1.1. Technology type extension
No BFD technology type has been defined in the "ietf-connectionless-
oam" model. Therefore a technology type extension is required in the
model Extension.
The snippet below depicts an example of augmenting "bfd" type into
the ietf-connectionless-oam":
augment "/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/"
+"coam:location-type/coam:ipv4-location-type"
+"/coam:test-point-ipv4-location-list/"
+"coam:test-point-locations/coam:technology"
{
leaf bfd{
type string;
}
}
5.1.1.2. Test point attributes extension
To support bfd technology, the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model can be
extended and add bfd specific parameters under "test-point-location"
list and/or add new location type such as "bfd over MPLS-TE" under
"location-type".
5.1.1.2.1. Define and insert new nodes into corresponding test-point-
location
In the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model, multiple "test-point-
location" lists are defined under the "location-type" choice node.
Therefore, to derive a model for some bfd technologies ( such as ip
single-hop, ip multi-hops, etc), data nodes for bfd specific details
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
need to be added into corresponding "test-point-locations" list. In
this section, we reuse some groupings which are defined in
[I-D.ietf-bfd-yang] as following:
The snippet below shows how the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model can
be extended to support "BFD IP single-hop":
augment "/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/"
+"coam:location-type/coam:ipv4-location-type"
+"/coam:test-point-ipv4-location-list/"
+"coam:test-point-locations"
{
container session-cfg {
description "BFD IP single-hop session configuration";
list sessions {
key "interface dest-addr";
description "List of IP single-hop sessions";
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Interface on which the BFD session is running.";
}
leaf dest-addr {
type inet:ip-address;
description "IP address of the peer";
}
uses bfd:bfd-grouping-common-cfg-parms;
uses bfd:bfd-grouping-echo-cfg-parms;
}
}
}
Similar augmentations can be defined to support other BFD
technologies such as BFD IP multi-hop, BFD over MPLS, etc.
5.1.1.2.2. Add new location-type cases
In the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model, If there is no appropriate
"location type" case that can be extended, a new "location-type" case
can be defined and inserted into the "location-type" choice node.
Therefore, the model user can flexibly add "location-type" to support
other type of test point which are not defined in the "ietf-
connectionless-oam" model. In this section, we add a new "location-
type" case and reuse some groupings which are defined in
[I-D.ietf-bfd-yang] as follows:
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
The snippet below shows how the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model can
be extended to support "BFD over MPLS-TE":
augment "/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/coam:location-type"{
case te-location{
list test-point-location-list{
key "tunnel-name";
leaf tunnel-name{
type leafref{
path "/te:te/te:tunnels/te:tunnel/te:name";
}
description
"point to a te instance.";
}
uses bfd:bfd-grouping-common-cfg-parms;
uses bfd-mpls:bfd-encap-cfg;
}
}
}
Similar augmentations can be defined to support other BFD
technologies such as BFD over LAG, etc.
5.1.2. Schema Mount
And another alternative method is using schema mount mechanism
[I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount] in the "ietf-connectionless-oam".
Within the "test-point-location" list, a "root" attribute is defined
to provide a mounted point for models mounted per "test-point-
location". Therefore, the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model can
provide a place in the node hierarchy where other OAM YANG data
models can be attached, without any special extension in the "ietf-
connectionless-oam" YANG data models [I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount].
Note that the limitation of the Schema Mount method is it is not
allowed to specify certain modules that are required to be mounted
under a mount point.
The snippet below depicts the definition of "root" attribute.
anydata root {
yangmnt:mount-point root;
description
"Root for models supported per
test point";
}
The following section shows how the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model
can use schema mount to support BFD technology.
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
5.1.2.1. BFD Modules be populated in schema-mount
To support BFD technology, "ietf-bfd-ip-sh" and "ietf-bfd-ip-mh" YANG
modules might be populated in the "schema-mounts" container:
<schema-mounts
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-schema-mount">
<mount-point>
<module> ietf-connectionless-oam </module>
<name>root</name>
<use-schema>
<name>root</name>
</use-schema>
</mount-point>
<schema>
<name>root</name>
<module>
<name>ietf-bfd-ip-sh </name>
<revision>2016-07-04</revision>
<namespace>
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-sh
</namespace>
<conformance-type>implement</conformance-type>
</module>
<module>
<name>ietf-bfd-ip-mh </name>
<revision> 2016-07-04</revision>
<namespace>
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-mh
</namespace>
<conformance-type>implement</conformance-type>
</module>
</schema>
</schema-mounts>
and the " ietf-connectionless-oam " module might have:
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
<ietf-connectionless-oam
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-connectionless-oam">
......
<test-point-locations>
<ipv4-location>192.0.2.1</ipv4-location>
......
<root>
<ietf-bfd-ip-sh uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-sh">
<ip-sh>
foo
......
</ip-sh>
</ietf-bfd-ip-sh>
<ietf-bfd-ip-mh uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-bfd-ip-mh">
<ip-mh>
foo
......
</ip-mh>
</ietf-bfd-ip-mh>
</root>
</test-point-locations>
</ietf-connectionless-oam>
5.2. LSP ping extension
5.2.1. Augment Method
The following sections shows how the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model
can be extended to support LSP ping technology. For this purpose, a
set of extension are introduced such as technology-type extension and
test-point attributes extension.
Note that in MPLS WG, there is a LSP Ping YANG data model
[I-D.zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg] to be produced. Users can choose
to use "ietf-connectioless-oam" as basis and augment the "ietf-
connectionless-oam" model with LSP Ping specific details in the model
extension. The LSP Ping specific details can be the grouping defined
in the LSP ping model.
5.2.1.1. Technology type extension
No lsp-ping technology type has been defined in the "ietf-
connectionless-oam" model. Therefore a technology type extension is
required in the model extension.
The snippet below depicts an example of augmenting the "ietf-
connectionless-oam" with "lsp-ping" type:
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
augment "/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/"
+"coam:location-type/coam:ipv4-location-type"
+"/coam:test-point-ipv4-location-list/"
+"coam:test-point-locations/coam:technology"
{
leaf lsp-ping{
type string;
}
}
5.2.1.2. Test point attributes extension
To support lsp-ping, the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model can be
extended and add lsp-ping specific parameters can be defined and
under "test-point-location" list.
User can reuse the attributes or groupings which are defined in
[I-D.zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg] as follows:
The snippet below depicts an example of augmenting the "test-point-
locations" list with lsp ping attributes:
augment "/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/"
+"coam:location-type/coam:ipv4-location-type"
+"/coam:test-point-ipv4-location-list/"
+"coam:test-point-locations"
{
list lsp-ping {
key "lsp-ping-name";
leaf lsp-ping-name {
type string {
length "1..31";
}
mandatory "true";
description "LSP Ping test name.";
......
}
5.2.2. Schema Mount
And another alternative method is using schema mount mechanism
[I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount] in the "ietf-connectionless-oam".
Within the "test-point-location" list, a "root" attribute is defined
to provide a mounted point for models mounted per "test-point-
location". Therefore, the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model can
provide a place in the node hierarchy where other OAM YANG data
models can be attached, without any special extension in the "ietf-
connectionless-oam" YANG data models [I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount].
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
Note that the limitation of the Schema Mount method is it is not
allowed to specify certain modules that are required to be mounted
under a mount point.
The snippet below depicts the definition of "root" attribute.
anydata root {
yangmnt:mount-point root;
description
"Root for models supported per
test point";
}
The following section shows how the "ietf-connectionless-oam" model
can use schema mount to support LSP-PING technology.
5.2.2.1. LSP-PING Modules be populated in schema-mount
To support LSP-PING technology, "ietf-lspping" YANG module
[I-D.zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg] might be populated in the "schema-
mounts" container:
<schema-mounts
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-yang-schema-mount">
<mount-point>
<module> ietf-connectionless-oam </module>
<name>root</name>
<use-schema>
<name>root</name>
</use-schema>
</mount-point>
<schema>
<name>root</name>
<module>
<name>ietf-lspping </name>
<revision>2016-03-18</revision>
<namespace>
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang: ietf-lspping
</namespace>
<conformance-type>implement</conformance-type>
</module>
</schema>
</schema-mounts>
and the " ietf-connectionless-oam " module might have:
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
<ietf-connectionless-oam
uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-connectionless-oam">
......
<test-point-locations>
<ipv4-location> 192.0.2.1</ipv4-location>
......
<root>
<ietf-lspping uri="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-lspping">
<lsp-pings>
foo
......
</lsp-pings>
</ietf-lspping>
</root>
</test-point-locations>
</ietf-connectionless-oam>
6. Security Considerations
The YANG module defined in this document is designed to be accessed
via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or
RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport
layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure
Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the
mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC5246].
The NETCONF access control model [RFC6536] provides the means to
restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a
preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol
operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations.
The vulnerable "config true" subtrees and data nodes are the
following:
/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/coam:location-type/coam:ipv4-
location-type/coam:test-point-ipv4-location-list/coam:test-point-
locations/
/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/coam:location-type/coam:ipv6-
location-type/coam:test-point-ipv6-location-list/coam:test-point-
locations/
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/coam:location-type/coam:mac-
location-type/coam:test-point-mac-address-location-list/coam:test-
point-locations/
/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/coam:location-type/coam:group-as-
number-location-type/coam:test-point-as-number-location-list/
coam:test-point-locations/
/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node/coam:location-type/coam:group-
system-id-location-type/coam:test-point-system-info-location-list/
coam:test-point-locations/
Unauthorized access to any of these lists can adversely affect OAM
management system handling of end-to-end OAM and coordination of OAM
within underlying network layers. This may lead to inconsistent
configuration, reporting, and presentation for the OAM mechanisms
used to manage the network.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data
nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/coam:cc-session-statistics-data/coam:cc-ipv4-sessions-statistics/
coam:cc-session-statistics/coam:session-count/
/coam:cc-session-statistics-data/coam:cc-ipv4-sessions-statistics/
coam:cc-session-statistics/coam:session-up-count/
/coam:cc-session-statistics-data/coam:cc-ipv4-sessions-statistics/
coam:cc-session-statistics/coam: session-down-count/
/coam:cc-session-statistics-data/coam:cc-ipv4-sessions-statistics/
coam:cc-session-statistics/coam:session-admin-down-count/
/coam:cc-session-statistics-data/coam:cc-ipv6-sessions-statistics/
coam:cc-session-statistics/coam:session-count/
/coam:cc-session-statistics-data/coam:cc-ipv6-sessions-statistics/
coam:cc-session-statistics/coam:session-up-count//
/coam:cc-session-statistics-data/coam:cc-ipv6-sessions-statistics/
coam:cc-session-statistics/coam:session-down-count/
/coam:cc-session-statistics-data/coam:cc-ipv6-sessions-statistics/
coam:cc-session-statistics/coam:session-admin-down-count/
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
7. IANA Considerations
This document registers a URI in the IETF XML registry [RFC3688].
Following the format in [RFC3688] the following registration is
requested to be made:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-connectionless-oam
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020].
name: ietf-connectionless-oam
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-connectionless-oam
prefix: coam
reference: RFC XXXX
8. Acknowlegements
The authors of this document would like to thank Greg Mirsky and
others for their sustainable review and comments, proposals to
improve and stabilize document.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC4443] Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, Ed., "Internet
Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet
Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", STD 89,
RFC 4443, DOI 10.17487/RFC4443, March 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4443>.
[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6536] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model", RFC 6536,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6536, March 2012,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6536>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7223] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management", RFC 7223, DOI 10.17487/RFC7223, May 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7223>.
[RFC792] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", RFC 792,
September 1981.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
9.2. Informative References
[G.8013] "OAM functions and mechanisms for Ethernet based
networks", ITU-T Recommendation G.8013/Y.1731, 2013.
[I-D.ietf-bfd-yang]
Rahman, R., Zheng, L., Jethanandani, M., Networks, J., and
G. Mirsky, "YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding
Detection (BFD)", draft-ietf-bfd-yang-06 (work in
progress), June 2017.
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
[I-D.ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo]
Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N.,
Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A Data Model for Network
Topologies", draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-15 (work in
progress), September 2017.
[I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model]
Kumar, D., Wu, Q., and Z. Wang, "Generic YANG Data Model
for Connection Oriented Operations, Administration, and
Maintenance(OAM) protocols", draft-ietf-lime-yang-
connection-oriented-oam-model-00 (work in progress), June
2017.
[I-D.ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods]
Kumar, D., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Rahman, R., and S. Raghavan,
"Retrieval Methods YANG Data Model for Connectionless
Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM)
protocols", draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-
methods-06 (work in progress), August 2017.
[I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount]
Bjorklund, M. and L. Lhotka, "YANG Schema Mount", draft-
ietf-netmod-schema-mount-06 (work in progress), July 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-sr-yang]
Litkowski, S., Qu, Y., Sarkar, P., and J. Tantsura, "YANG
Data Model for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-spring-sr-
yang-07 (work in progress), July 2017.
[I-D.zheng-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-cfg]
Zheng, L., Aldrin, S., Zheng, G., Mirsky, G., and R.
Rahman, "Yang Data Model for LSP-PING", draft-zheng-mpls-
lsp-ping-yang-cfg-05 (work in progress), June 2017.
[RFC5462] Andersson, L. and R. Asati, "Multiprotocol Label Switching
(MPLS) Label Stack Entry: "EXP" Field Renamed to "Traffic
Class" Field", RFC 5462, DOI 10.17487/RFC5462, February
2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5462>.
[RFC6136] Sajassi, A., Ed. and D. Mohan, Ed., "Layer 2 Virtual
Private Network (L2VPN) Operations, Administration, and
Maintenance (OAM) Requirements and Framework", RFC 6136,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6136, March 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6136>.
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
[RFC7276] Mizrahi, T., Sprecher, N., Bellagamba, E., and Y.
Weingarten, "An Overview of Operations, Administration,
and Maintenance (OAM) Tools", RFC 7276,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7276, June 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7276>.
Authors' Addresses
Deepak Kumar
CISCO Systems
510 McCarthy Blvd
Milpitas, CA 95035
USA
Email: dekumar@cisco.com
Michael Wang
Huawei Technologies,Co.,Ltd
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing 210012
China
Email: wangzitao@huawei.com
Qin Wu
Huawei
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012
China
Email: bill.wu@huawei.com
Reshad Rahman
Cisco Systems
2000 Innovation Drive
Kanata, Ontario K2K 3E8
Canada
Email: rrahman@cisco.com
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft Connection-Less OAM YANG model September 2017
Srihari Raghavan
Cisco Systems
Tril Infopark Sez, Ramanujan IT City
Neville Block, 2nd floor, Old Mahabalipuram Road
Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600113
India
Email: srihari@cisco.com
Kumar, et al. Expires March 19, 2018 [Page 49]