ALTO WG LM. Contreras
Internet-Draft Telefonica
Intended status: Informational D. Lachos
Expires: May 7, 2020 C. Rothenberg
Unicamp
November 4, 2019
Use of ALTO for Determining Service Edge
draft-contreras-alto-service-edge-00
Abstract
Service providers are starting to deploy and interconnect computing
capabilities across the network for hosting network functions and
applications. In distributed computing environments, both computing
and topological information are necessary in order to determine the
more convenient infrastructure where to deploy such a service or
application. This document raises an initial approach towards the
use of ALTO to provide such information and assist in the selection
of proper execution environments.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 7, 2020.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
Contreras, et al. Expires May 7, 2020 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft ALTO for Determining Service Edge November 2019
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Computing needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Usage of ALTO for determining where to deploy a function or
application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Compute information in ALTO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Association of compute capabilities to network topology . 4
3.3. ALTO architecture for determining serve edge . . . . . . 5
4. Definition of flavors in ALTO property map . . . . . . . . . 5
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
The advent of virtualization is enabling the operators with a dynamic
instantiation of network functions and applications by using
different techniques on top of commoditized computation
infrastructures, permitting a flexible and on-demand deployment of
services, aligned with the actual needs observed as demanded by the
customers.
Operators are starting to deploy distributed computing environments
in different parts of the network with the objective of addressing
the different service needs in terms of latency, bandwidth,
processing capabilities, etc. This is translated in the emergence of
a number of data centers of different sizes (e.g., large, medium,
small) characterized by distinct dimension of CPUs, memory and
storage capabilities, as well as bandwidth capacity for forwarding
the traffic generated in and out the corresponding data center.
The probable future situation, with the generalization and
proliferation of the edge computing approach, will increase the
potential footprint where a function or application can be deployed.
These different dimensioning rules result in a different unitary cost
per CPU, memory, and storage in each computing environment because of
the scale.
Contreras, et al. Expires May 7, 2020 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft ALTO for Determining Service Edge November 2019
All the available distributed computing capabilities can complicate
the decision of what infrastructure use for instantiating a given
function or application. Such a decision influences not only the
resources that are consumed in a given computing environment, but
also the network capacity of the path that connects such environment
with the rest of the network from traffic source to destination.
It is then essential for a network operator to have mechanisms
assisting on the decision by considering a number of constraints
related to the function or application to be deployed, but also by
understanding how a given decision on the computing environment for
the service edge affects to the transport network substrate.
This document proposes the usage of ALTO [RFC7285] for assisting with
such a decision.
2. Computing needs
A given network function or application typically shows certain
requirements in terms of processing capabilities (i.e., CPU), as well
as volatile memory (i.e., RAM) and storage capacity.
Cloud computing providers, such as Amazon Web Services or Microsoft
Azure, typically structure their offerings of computing capabilities
by bundling CPU, RAM and storage units as quotas, instances or
flavors that can be consumed in an ephemeral or temporal fashion,
during the actual lifetime of the required function or application.
This same approach is being taken nowadays for characterizing bundles
of resources on the so-called Network Function Virtualization
Infrastructure (NFVI) Points of Presence (PoPs) being deployed by the
telco operators. Specifically, the Common Network Function
Virtualisation Infrastructure Telecom Taskforce (CNTT) [CNTT],
jointly hosted by GSMA and the Linux Foundation, is intending to
harmonize the definition of flavors for abstracting capabilities of
the underlying NFVI facilitating a more efficient utilization of the
infrastructure and simplifying the integration and certification of
functions.
Focusing on the CNTT ongoing work, the flavors or instances are
characterized according to a number of characteristics:
o Type of instance (T): the types of instances are characterized as
B (Basic), N (Network Intensive), and C (Compute Intensive).
o Interface Option (I): it refers to the interface bandwidth.
Contreras, et al. Expires May 7, 2020 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft ALTO for Determining Service Edge November 2019
o Compute flavor (F): it refers to a certain combination of virtual
CPU, RAM, disk, and bandwidth for the management interface.
o Optional storage extension (S): to request additional storage
capacity.
o Optional hardware acceleration characteristics (A): to request
specific acceleration capabilities for improving the performance
of the infrastructure.
The naming convention of an instance is thus encoded as T.I.F.S.A.
3. Usage of ALTO for determining where to deploy a function or
application
ALTO can assist in the selection of convenient flavors or instances
of the computing substrate by taking into consideration cost metrics.
A generic and primary approach is to take into account metrics
related to the computing environment, such as availability of
resources, unitary cost of those resources, etc.
Nevertheless, the function or application to be deployed on top of
such flavor is interconnected outside the computing environment where
it is deployed, also requiring to guarantee some transport network
requirements, such as bandwidth, latency, etc.
The objective then is to leverage on ALTO provide information about
the more convenient execution environments to deploy virtualized
network functions or applications, allowing the operator to get a
coordinated service edge and transport network recommendation.
3.1. Compute information in ALTO
CNTT proposes the existence of an infrastructure profiles catalogue
collecting the instances available to be consumed. Such kind of
catalogue could be communicated to ALTO or even incorporated to it.
ALTO server queries are required to support T.I.F.S.A encoding in
order to retrieve proper maps from ALTO. Additionally, filtered
queries for particular characteristics of a flavor could also be
supported.
3.2. Association of compute capabilities to network topology
It is required to associate the location of the available instances
with topological information to allow ALTO construct the overall map.
Contreras, et al. Expires May 7, 2020 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft ALTO for Determining Service Edge November 2019
At this stage three potential solutions could be considered:
o To leverage on (and possibly
extend) [I-D.ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model] for disseminating
topology information together with notion of function location
(that would require to be adapted to the existence of available
compute capabilities).
o To extend BGP-LS [RFC7752], already considered as mechanism for
feeding topology information in ALTO, to advertise computing
capabilities as well.
o To combine information from the infrastructure profiles catalogue
with topological information by leveraging on the IP prefixes
allocated to the gateway providing connectivity to the NFVI PoP.
The viability of these options will be explored in future versions of
this document.
3.3. ALTO architecture for determining serve edge
The following logical architecture defines the usage of ALTO for
determining service edges.
+--------+ Topological +---------+
| | Information | |
| |<--------------->| e.g.BGP |
ALTO | | | |
+--------+ protocol | | +---------+
| Client |<----------->| ALTO |
+--------+ | Server |
| | Computing +---------+
| | Information | e.g., |
| |<--------------->| Infra. |
| | |Catalogue|
+--------+ +---------+
Figure 1: Service Edge Information Exchange
4. Definition of flavors in ALTO property map
The ALTO unified property extension [DRAFT-PM] generalizes the
concept of endpoint properties to domains of other entities through
property maps. In the context of the CNTT domain, an ALTO property
Contreras, et al. Expires May 7, 2020 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft ALTO for Determining Service Edge November 2019
map could be used to expose T.I.F.S.A information of potential
candidate flavors, i.e., potential NFVI PoPs where an application or
service can be deployed.
Table 1 below shows an illustrative example of an ALTO property map
with property values grouped by flavor name.
+----------+-----------+-------------+------------------+-----+-----+
| Flavor | Type of | Interface | Compute flavor | S. | A. |
| Name | instance | Option (I) | (F) {CPU, RAM, | | |
| | (T) | | disk and | | |
| | | | bandwidth} | | |
+----------+-----------+-------------+------------------+-----+-----+
| Small-1 | Basic | {1, 2, 3, | {1,512 MB,1 GB,1 | ... | ... |
| | | 4, 5, 6, 7, | Gbps} | | |
| | | 8, 9 Gbps} | | | |
| Small-2 | Network | {1, 2, 3, | {1,512 MB,1 GB,1 | ... | ... |
| | Intensive | 4, 5, 6, 7, | Gbps} | | |
| | | 8, 9 Gbps} | | | |
| Medium-1 | Network | {25, 50, | {2,4 GB,40 GB,1 | ... | ... |
| | Intensive | 75, 100, | Gbps} | | |
| | | 125, 150 | | | |
| | | Gbps} | | | |
| Large-1 | Compute | {50, 100, | {4,8 GB,80 GB,1 | ... | ... |
| | Intensive | 150, 200, | Gbps} | | |
| | | 250, 300 | | | |
| | | Gbps} | | | |
| Large-2 | Compute | {100, 200, | {8,16 GB,160 | ... | ... |
| | Intensive | 300, 400, | GB,1 Gbps} | | |
| | | 500, 600 | | | |
| | | Gbps} | | | |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
+----------+-----------+-------------+------------------+-----+-----+
Table 1: ALTO Property Map
5. IANA Considerations
This document includes no request to IANA.
6. Security Considerations
TBD.
Contreras, et al. Expires May 7, 2020 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft ALTO for Determining Service Edge November 2019
7. Conclusions
Telco networks will increasingly contain a number of interconnected
data centers, of different size and characteristics, allowing
flexibility in the dynamic deployment of functions and applications
for advance services. The overall objective of this document is to
begin a discussion in the ALTO WG regarding the suitability of the
ALTO protocol for determining where to deploy a function or
application in distributed computing environments. The result of
such discussions will be reflected in future versions of this draft.
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC7285] Alimi, R., Ed., Penno, R., Ed., Yang, Y., Ed., Kiesel, S.,
Previdi, S., Roome, W., Shalunov, S., and R. Woundy,
"Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Protocol",
RFC 7285, DOI 10.17487/RFC7285, September 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7285>.
[RFC7752] Gredler, H., Ed., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and
S. Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and
Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", RFC 7752,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7752, March 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>.
[RFC8189] Randriamasy, S., Roome, W., and N. Schwan, "Multi-Cost
Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO)", RFC 8189,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8189, October 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8189>.
8.2. Informative References
[CNTT] "Common NFVI for Telco Reference Model, Release 2.0",
September 2019,
<https://cntt-n.github.io/CNTT/doc/ref_model/>.
[DRAFT-PM]
Roome, W., Randriamasy, S., Yang, Y., Zhang, J., and K.
Gao, "Unified Properties for the ALTO Protocol", draft-
ietf-alto-unified-props-new-09 (work in progress),
September 2019.
Contreras, et al. Expires May 7, 2020 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft ALTO for Determining Service Edge November 2019
[I-D.ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model]
Bryskin, I., Liu, X., Lee, Y., Guichard, J., Contreras,
L., Ceccarelli, D., and J. Tantsura, "SF Aware TE Topology
YANG Model", draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-03 (work
in progress), March 2019.
Authors' Addresses
Luis M. Contreras
Telefonica
Ronda de la Comunicacion, s/n
Madrid 28050
Spain
Email: luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com
URI: http://lmcontreras.com/
Danny Alex Lachos Perez
University of Campinas
Av. Albert Einstein 400
Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-970
Brazil
Email: dlachosp@dca.fee.unicamp.br
URI: https://intrig.dca.fee.unicamp.br/danny-lachos/
Christian Esteve Rothenberg
University of Campinas
Av. Albert Einstein 400
Campinas, Sao Paulo 13083-970
Brazil
Email: chesteve@dca.fee.unicamp.br
URI: https://intrig.dca.fee.unicamp.br/christian/
Contreras, et al. Expires May 7, 2020 [Page 8]