Design Choices When Expanding DNS
draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Patrik Fältström  , Rob Austein 
Last updated 2004-05-14
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ymbk-dns-choices-00.txt

Abstract

This note discusses how to extend the DNS with new data, for a new application. A discussion which too often circulate around reuse of the TXT record. It lists different mechanisms to accomplish the extension to DNS, and comes to the conclusion use of a new RR Type is the best solution.

Authors

Patrik Fältström (paf@cisco.com)
Rob Austein (sra@hactrn.net)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)