RTCP Extension for Feedback Suppression Indication
draft-wu-avt-retransmission-supression-rtp-08
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2011-10-25 (latest revision 2010-12-09) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-avtcore-feedback-supression-rtp | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-avtcore-feedback-supression-rtp | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wu-avt-retransmission-supression-rtp-08.txt
Abstract
In a large RTP session using the RTCP feedback mechanism defined in RFC 4585, a media source or middlebox may experience transient overload if some event causes a large number of receivers to send feedback at once. This feedback implosion can be mitigated if the device suffering from overload can send a third party loss report message to the receivers to inhibit further feedback. This memo defines RTCP extensions for third party loss report, to suppress NACK and FIR feedback requests. It also defines associated SDP signalling.
Authors
Qin Wu
(sunseawq@huawei.com)
Frank Xia
(xiayangsong@huawei.com)
Roni Even
(even.roni@huawei.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)