Considerations for Civic Addresses in PIDF-LO
draft-wolf-civicaddresses-austria-01
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Karl Wolf , Alexander Mayrhofer | ||
Last updated | 2008-02-19 | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document provides a guideline for creating civic address consideration documents for individual countries, as required by RFC 4776. Since civic addresses may have a different format in individual countries, such address considerations are necessary in order to map the civic address elements to the PIDF Location Object (PIDF-LO) elements.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)