%% You should probably cite draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores instead of this I-D. @techreport{wilton-netmod-opstate-yang-02, number = {draft-wilton-netmod-opstate-yang-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wilton-netmod-opstate-yang/02/}, author = {Robert Wilton}, title = {{"With-config-state" Capability for NETCONF/RESTCONF}}, pagetotal = 24, year = 2015, month = dec, day = 21, abstract = {This document proposes a possible alternative solution for handling applied configuration state in YANG as described in draft-openconfig- netmod-opstate-01. The proposed solution, roughly modelled on the with-defaults NETCONF/RESTCONF capability, aims to meet the key requirements set out in draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-01 without the need for YANG module authors to explicitly duplicate configuration nodes in both configuration and operational containers. This draft does not address the issue of co-location of configuration and operational state for interfaces, nor does it provide a NETCONF mechanism to retrieve operational data separately from configuration data.}, }