Considerations in Validating the Path in BGP
draft-white-pathconsiderations-09

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, <iana@iana.org>, ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Informational RFC to be: 
         draft-white-pathconsiderations-10.txt 

The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Considerations in 
Validating the Path in BGP' <draft-white-pathconsiderations-10.txt> as an 
Informational RFC. 

The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in 
the datatracker 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11359&rfc_flag=0) 
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit 
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot 
and the comment log. 

The IESG contact person is Alex Zinin.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-white-pathconsiderations-10.txt


The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html.

Thank you,

The IESG Secretary

Ballot Text

Technical Summary
 
 This document reprents author's view on considerations related to
 BGP route path validation.
 
Working Group Summary
 
 This document is an idvididual submission via RFC Editor. It has been
 referred to the RPSEC WG for a review. The WG has no objection to this
 document being published by the RFC Editor.
 
Protocol Quality
 
 Not applicable.

IESG Note:

 After consultation with the RPSEC WG, the IESG thinks that this work is
 related to IETF work done in WG RPSEC, but this does not prevent publishing.

 The IESG also recommends that a standard IESG note described in RFC 3932,
 section 4, case 2, is inserted in the document before publication.

RFC Editor Note