Transport Considerations for IP and UDP Proxying in MASQUE
draft-westerlund-masque-transport-issues-00

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Magnus Westerlund  , Marcus Ihlar  , Zaheduzzaman Sarker  , Mirja K├╝hlewind 
Last updated 2021-01-11 (latest revision 2020-07-10)
Stream (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Additional Resources
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-westerlund-masque-transport-issues-00.txt

Abstract

The HTTP Connect method uses back-to-back TCP connections to and from a proxy. Such a solution takes care of many transport aspects as well as IP Flow related concerns. With UDP and IP proxying on the other hand, there are several per-packet and per-flow aspects that need consideration to preserve the properties of end- to-end IP/UDP flows. The aim of this document is to highlight and provide solutions for these issues related to UDP and IP proxying.

Authors

Magnus Westerlund (magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com)
Marcus Ihlar (marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com)
Zaheduzzaman Sarker (Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com)
Mirja K├╝hlewind (mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)