Egress Protection for EVPN BUM
draft-wang-bess-evpn-bum-egress-protection-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Yubao Wang , Ran Chen | ||
| Last updated | 2022-01-31 (Latest revision 2021-07-30) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
When the procedures per [I-D.ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection] are applied to EVPN services, the egress-protection on PLR is typically more faster than the new DF node of the affected ESI is re-elected. As a result of that, replicated BUM packets will be sent to the CEs of the affected ES. This draft describes a "NDF-bias" mechanism that is used to avoid such excessive BUM packets.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)