Skip to main content

Additional Methods for Generating Key Identifiers and Key Identifier Semantic Extension
draft-turner-additional-methods-4kis-05

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 7093.
Authors Sean Turner , Stephen Kent
Last updated 2012-05-30
RFC stream (None)
Formats
IETF conflict review conflict-review-turner-additional-methods-4kis, conflict-review-turner-additional-methods-4kis, conflict-review-turner-additional-methods-4kis, conflict-review-turner-additional-methods-4kis, conflict-review-turner-additional-methods-4kis
Additional resources
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Became RFC 7093 (Informational)
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-turner-additional-methods-4kis-05
Network Working Group                                          S. Turner
Internet-Draft                                                      IECA
Intended Status: Informational                                   S. Kent
Expires: December 1, 2012                                            BBN
                                                            May 30, 2012

           Additional Methods for Generating Key Identifiers
                 and Key Identifier Semantic Extension
              draft-turner-additional-methods-4kis-05.txt

Abstract

   This document specifies additional methods for generating key
   identifiers from a public key.  This document also specifies an
   extension to identify the algorithms used to generate the key
   identifiers.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors. All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.
 

Turner & Kent           Expires December 1, 2012                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft   Additional Methods For Key Identifiers     May 30, 2012

1.  Introduction

   [RFC5280] defines the AKI (Authority Key Identifier) and SKI (Subject
   Key Identifier) certificate extensions.  These extensions allow one
   certificate to refer to another certificate via the matching of these
   corresponding values.  These identifiers enable a relying party to
   disambiguate between two CA (Certification Authority) certificates
   with the same Subject name, located in the same directory entry. 
   These identifiers are used during certification path construction in
   support of heuristics to reduce relying party workload.  These
   identifiers are not used during certificate path validation.  These
   key identifiers are used by PKI-enabled security protocols, such as
   CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) [RFC4210] and CMS
   (Cryptographic Message Syntax) [RFC5652], to identify the certificate
   used to protect a message, a session, etc.

   [RFC5280] describes two example mechanisms for generating AKI/SKI
   values: a 160-bit SHA-1 (Secure Hash Algorithm) hash of the public
   key and a four-bit type field with the value 0100 followed by the
   least significant 60 bits of the SHA-1 hash.  Both of these
   mechanisms were designed to be non-security critical.  That is, the
   use of a hash algorithm was intended to provide a high probability
   (but not a guarantee) of uniqueness.  [RFC5280] allows for additional
   mechanisms.  (This is consistent with the fact that the SKI and AKI
   extensions are always marked non-critical.)  In addition, some
   secruity protocols (e.g., SMIME [RFC5751]) as a shorthand way to
   refer to a cert.

   This document defines two additional mechanisms for generating key
   identifier values, using SHA-256 and SHA-512 [SHS]. Sample code for
   SHA-256 and SHA-512 can be found in [RFC6234]. The motivation for
   defining these additional means of generating AKI/SKI values is to
   accommodate use of additional, standard one-way hash functions that
   are becoming more widely used in PKI contexts.  Note that these
   example methods like the examples methods from [RFC5280] are designed
   to be non-security critical.  

   With these additional mechanisms, CAs can omit code for algorithms
   that are otherwise unwanted or unused.  For example, a CA that issues
   certificates hashed with SHA-256 and signed with ECDSA on the P-256
   curve [RFC5480] might no longer need to implement SHA-1 as part of
   their CA application.

   This document also specifies an extension to identify the algorithm
   used to generate the SKI.  The extension also identifies the hash
   algorithm input used to generate to the key identifier. 

 

Turner & Kent           Expires December 1, 2012                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft   Additional Methods For Key Identifiers     May 30, 2012

1.1.  Requirements Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

1.2.  ASN.1

   The extension is defined using ASN.1 [X.680], [X.681], [X.682], and
   [X.683].

2.  Additional Methods for Generating Key Identifiers

   As specified in [RFC5280], both authority and subject key identifiers
   SHOULD be derived from the public key.  Two additional mechanisms CAs
   can use to identify public keys are as follows:

     1) The keyIdentifier is composed of the least significant 160-bits
        of the SHA-256 hash of the value of the BIT STRING
        subjectPublicKey (excluding the tag, length, and number of
        unused bits).

     2) The keyIdentifier is composed of the least significant 160-bits
        of the SHA-512 hash of the value of the BIT STRING
        subjectPublicKey (excluding the tag, length, and number of
        unused bits).

3.  Subject Key Identifier Semantics Extension

   The SKI semantics extension indicates the hash algorithm, the hash
   algorithm input used to compute the SKI, and any semantics the issuer
   chooses to communicate via the SKI.  This allows the CA to embed
   additional semantics in to the SKI, allowing it to be used for
   purposes beyond certificate path building.  This extension MAY, at
   the option of the certificate issuer, be either critical or non-
   critical.  This extension is identified by id-pe-skiSemantics.

     ext-skiSemantics EXTENSION ::= {
       SYNTAX SKISemantics
       IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-skiSemantics }

     id-pe-skiSemantics OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe TBD }

 

Turner & Kent           Expires December 1, 2012                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft   Additional Methods For Key Identifiers     May 30, 2012

     SKISemantics ::= SEQUENCE {
       skiAlgorithm  AlgorithmIdentifier
                      { DIGEST-ALGORITHM, { SKIHashAlgs } },
       skiInput      OBJECT IDENTIFIER ( SKIInputs, ... ) OPTIONAL,
       skiOutput     OBJECT IDENTIFIER ( SKIOutputs, ... ) OPTIONAL }

     SKIHashAlgs DIGEST-ALGORITHM ::= {
       mda-sha256 | mda-sha512, ... }

     SKIInputs OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
       id-subjectPublicKeyInfo, ... }

     id-subjectPublicKeyInfo OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-tbd }

     SKIOutputs OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ... }

   SKISemantics has three fields:

     o akiAlgorithm indicates the algorithm used to generate the key
       identifier.  For example, if the CA wanted to indicate that one
       of the algorithms listed in Section 2 was used, then it would
       include OIDs (Object Identifiers) from [RFC5758].  

     o akiInput indicates the semantics for the input to the hash
       algorithm.  If this field is absent, then only the public key is
       hashed.  This document defines the OID id-subjectPublicKeyInfo to
       be used when the input to the hash algorithm is the certificate's
       SubjectPublicKeyInfo field [RFC5280].

     o skiOutput indicates the key identifier's semantics.  If this
       field is absent, then key identifier is the hash (algorithm
       identified in kiAlgorithm) of the value of the BIT STRING
       subjectPublicKey (excluding the tag, length, and number of unused
       bits).  This document defines the OID id-subjectPublicKeyInfo to
       be used when the input to the hash algorithm is the certificate's
       SubjectPublicKeyInfo field [RFC5280].  

4.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations of [RFC5280] apply to certificates.  The
   security considerations of [RFC5758] apply to the hash algorithms. 
   The security considerations of [RFC5912] apply to the ASN.1.

   While hash algorithms provide collision resistance, this property is
   not needed for key identifiers.  

 

Turner & Kent           Expires December 1, 2012                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft   Additional Methods For Key Identifiers     May 30, 2012

5.  IANA Considerations

   None.

   NOTE there are some OIDs that need to be registered in the PKIX Arc. 
   This will be completed later in the process.

6.  Acknowledgements

   The authors wish to thank Santosh Chokhani, Tom Gindin, Peter
   Gutmann, Henry Holtz, David Kemp, James Manager, Timothy Miller,
   Michael StJohns, Stefan Santesson, Jim Schaad, Rene Struik, Koichi
   Sugimoto, and Carl Wallace for taking the time to participate in the
   discussions about this document.  The discussions resulted in
   numerous editorial and technical changes to the document.

7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
             Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
             Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
             Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
             (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, May 2008.

   [RFC5758] Dang, Q., Santesson, S., Moriarty, K., Brown, D., and T.
             Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Additional
             Algorithms and Identifiers for DSA and ECDSA", RFC 5758,
             January 2010.

   [RFC5912] Hoffman, P. and J. Schaad, "New ASN.1 Modules for the
             Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)", RFC 5912,
             June 2010.

   [SHS]     National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), FIPS
             Publication 180-3: Secure Hash Standard, October 2008.

   [X.680]   ITU-T Recommendation X.680 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002,
             Information technology - Abstract Syntax Notation One
             (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation.

 

Turner & Kent           Expires December 1, 2012                [Page 5]
Internet-Draft   Additional Methods For Key Identifiers     May 30, 2012

   [X.681]   ITU-T Recommendation X.681 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-2:2002,
             Information Technology - Abstract Syntax Notation One:
             Information Object Specification.

   [X.682]   ITU-T Recommendation X.682 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-3:2002,
             Information Technology - Abstract Syntax Notation One:
             Constraint Specification.

   [X.683]   ITU-T Recommendation X.683 (2002) | ISO/IEC 8824-4:2002,
             Information Technology - Abstract Syntax Notation One:
             Parameterization of ASN.1 Specifications.

7.2.  Informative References

   [RFC4210] Adams, C., Farrell, S., Kause, T., and T. Mononen,
             "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
             Management Protocol (CMP)", RFC 4210, September 2005.

   [RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,
             RFC 5652, September 2009.

   [RFC5480] Turner, S., Brown, D., Yiu, K., Housley, R., and T. Polk,
             "Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key
             Information", RFC 5480, March 2009.

   [RFC5751] Ramsdell, B. and S. Turner, "Secure/Multipurpose Internet
             Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Message
             Specification", RFC 5751, January 2010.

   [RFC6234] Eastlake 3rd, D. and T. Hansen, "US Secure Hash Algorithms
             (SHA and SHA-based HMAC and HKDF)", RFC 6234, May 2011.

 

Turner & Kent           Expires December 1, 2012                [Page 6]
Internet-Draft   Additional Methods For Key Identifiers     May 30, 2012

Appendix A  ASN.1 Module

   KISemantics-2012
      { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
        security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
        id-mod-kiSemantics(TBD) }

     DEFINITIONS EXPLICIT TAGS ::=
     BEGIN
     IMPORTS

     -- Imports are all from [RFC5912]

     EXTENSION
       FROM PKIX-CommonTypes-2009
        { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
          security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
          id-mod-pkixCommon-02(57) }

     id-pe
       FROM PKIX1Explicit-2009
         { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
           security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
           id-mod-pkix1-explicit-02(51) }

     AlgorithmIdentifier{}, DIGEST-ALGORITHM
       FROM AlgorithmInformation-2009
         { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
           security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
           id-mod-algorithmInformation-02(58) }

     mda-sha224, mda-sha256, mda-sha384, mda-sha512
       FROM PKIX1-PSS-OAEP-Algorithms-2009
         { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
           security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
           id-mod-pkix1-rsa-pkalgs-02(54) } ;

     ext-skiSemantics EXTENSION ::= {
       SYNTAX SKISemantics
       IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-skiSemantics }

     id-pe-skiSemantics OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe TBD }

     SKISemantics ::= SEQUENCE {
       skiAlgorithm   AlgorithmIdentifier
                        { DIGEST-ALGORITHM, { SKIHashAlgs } },
       skiInput       OBJECT IDENTIFIER ( SKIInputs, ... ) OPTIONAL,
       skiOutput      OBJECT IDENTIFIER ( SKIOutputs, ... ) OPTIONAL }
 

Turner & Kent           Expires December 1, 2012                [Page 7]
Internet-Draft   Additional Methods For Key Identifiers     May 30, 2012

     SKIHashAlgs DIGEST-ALGORITHM ::= {
       mda-sha256 | mda-sha512, ... }

     SKIInputs OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
       id-subjectPublicKeyInfo, ... }

     id-subjectPublicKeyInfo OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-tbd }

     SKIOutputs OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ... }

     END

Authors' Addresses

   Sean Turner
   IECA, Inc.
   3057 Nutley Street, Suite 106
   Fairfax, VA 22031
   USA

   EMail: turners@ieca.com

   Stephen Kent
   BBN Technologies
   10 Moulton St.
   Cambridge, MA 02138

   EMail: kent@bbn.com

Turner & Kent           Expires December 1, 2012                [Page 8]