Behavior of Collocated HA/LMA
draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | George Tsirtsis , Suresh Krishnan | ||
| Last updated | 2008-10-22 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
In discussions about PMIPv6-MIPv6 interactions in NETLMM WG, scenario C describes the case of collocation of LMA and HA function. In this case a PMIP network emulates the "home link" for MNs using MIPv6. This document argues that even when LMA and HA functions are Collocated they MUST be treated as logically separate entities. In particular this draft argues that PMIP BCEs MUST NOT overwrite MIPv6 BCEs and vice versa.
Authors
George Tsirtsis
Suresh Krishnan
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)